The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

16 protocols using mboii

1

Genotyping of IL-31 Gene Polymorphism

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from 200 μl EDTA-anticoagulated peripheral blood sample with a DNA isolation kit (BioTeke, Peking, China) as the manufacturer's direction. DNA was stably stored at −20°C until assayed. Genotyping of the IL-31 gene polymorphism was conducted by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). We designed the PCR primers with software Primer 3 (http://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3‐0.4.0/primer3/) [27 (link)] as shown in Table 1. The 10 μl PCR reaction system was consisted of 1.0 μl DNA and 5 μl 2× Power Taq PCR Master Mix (BioTeke, Peking, China), forward and reverse primer 0.1 μl, respectively, and reserved volume was made up to 10 μl by sterilized water. The PCR condition was designed as 95°C for 4 min firstly, then 33 cycles at 95°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s, and finally, 72°C for 10 min. Furthermore, the PCR products were digested in 37°C stable incubation by distinguished restriction enzyme MboII (New England Biolabs, Peking, China) for 30 minutes of rs4758680 and ScrFI (New England Biolabs, Peking, China) for 2 hours of rs7977932 as shown in Table 1, separately. Ultimately, the results were visually analyzed by 6% polyacrylamide gels in silver staining. To verify the genotyping results, DNA sequencing was performed in about 20% PCR-amplified DNA samples randomly.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Restriction Digest of 18S rRNA Gene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The secondary PCR products of the 18S rRNA gene were purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer's instruction and were digested using the SspI or MboII (New England Bio Labs Inc.) restriction enzymes (Xiao et al., 1999 (link), Xiao et al., 2001 (link); Feng et al., 2007 (link)). Briefly, 10 μl of the purified secondary PCR product was digested with 5 units of enzyme and 2 μl of the corresponding 10× buffer in a final volume of 20 μl. All restriction digestions were carried out at 37 °C overnight, fractionated on 2% agarose gel and visualised after Gel red staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cryptosporidium Species and Genotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nucleic acid was extracted from all fecal specimens and water filters using the FastDNA® SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, LLC, Solon, OH) following the methods described [20 (link)]. DNA extracts were subsequently tested using a polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) approach where a segment (∼833 bp) of the Cryptosporidium SSU rRNA gene is amplified by nested PCR and then species and genotype diagnosis is made by restriction digestion of the secondary PCR product with SspI (New England BioLabs, Beverly, MA), and either VspI (Promega, Madison, WI) or MboII (New England BioLabs) [21 (link),22 ]. Each sample was run in duplicate by PCR-RFLP analyses with appropriate controls. Specimens that were positive for Cryptosporidium by the SSU rRNA PCR were confirmed by DNA sequencing of the 18S PCR products (C. suis, C. xiaoi and C. hominis). A subset of specimens positive for C. hominis were also subtyped by sequencing the 60-kilodalton glycoprotein (GP60; ∼900 bp) in both directions on an ABI 3130 Genetic Analyzer (Foster City, CA) [23 (link)]. All sequences obtained were aligned with reference sequences using MEGA 6.0 or ClustalX software (http://www.clustal.org/) to identify Cryptosporidium species and C. hominis genotypes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

PCR-RFLP Protocol for G6PD Mediterranean Variant

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All samples were subjected to PCR-RFLP to assess the Mediterranean variant in exon 6, based on the protocol of Samilchuk et al. [17] (link) with modifications including use of primers F14948 and R15158 at 250 nM, a volume of 2 µl of each genomic DNA template, a final reaction volume of 30 µl containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.4), 50 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 125 µM 4-deoxynucleotide triphosphate (dNTPs), and 0.05 units Platinum®Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen, Brazil). After pre-denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, 45 PCR cycles were undertaken involving denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 55°C for 1 min and extension at 72°C for 1 min, with post-extension at 72°C for 7 min, using a MyCycler™ thermal cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, U.S.A.). To examine the 563C>T mutation (Mediterranean variant, Table 1), 10 µl of each PCR product was digested with 10 units of the restriction enzyme MboII (New England Biolabs Inc.) at 37°C for 3 hours and visualized by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. A product pattern of 104+98+28 bp indicates G6PD Mediterranean mutation, whereas the digestion pattern 202+28 bp indicates wild-type.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Rapid Identification of 23S rDNA Mutations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
23S rDNA mutations were confirmed using the published restriction fragment length polymorphism methods previously described.6 (link),11 (link) Briefly, an initial 23S rDNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) product specific to T. pallidum genomic DNA served as template for a nested PCR. For restriction enzyme digestion, the A2058G mutation was detected with MboII (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, Mass) and the A2059G mutation with BsaI (NEB). Wild type amplicons were not cut by either enzyme.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

High-throughput 4C-seq library preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The design of VPs and preparation of 4C-seq libraries was performed as described by Matelot and Noordermeer (2016) (link), with only minor modifications. DpnII or its isoschiszomer MboII (New England Biolabs) were chosen as the primary restriction enzyme, and NlaIII (New England Biolabs) as the secondary restriction enzyme. ESC and EpiLC material were harvested from 150 cm2 culture flasks (TPP Techno Plastic Products AG), which provided ample material for up to four technical replicates presuming cells were healthy and near confluency. To avoid technical artifacts, crosslinking and library preparation were performed in parallel for each experiment. For each VP, approximately 1 µg of library material was amplified using 16 individual PCR reactions with inverse primers containing indexed Illumina TruSeq adapters (primer sequences are listed in Supplementary file 1). PCR products were originally purified using the MinElute PCR purification kit (Qiagen) to remove unincorporated primer, but we found that purification was more efficiently performed using Agencourt AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter). Sequencing was performed on the Illumina NextSeq 500 system, using 75 bp single-end reads with up to 14 VPs multiplexed per run.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

DNA Cleavage Assay of TieA Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nuclease assay was performed in a 30 μl reaction mixture containing 1 μg of pUC19 or lambda DNA substrate (New England Biolabs). Briefly, 1 μg of the DNA substrate was incubated with indicated concentration of TieA protein in 1× NEB cut smart buffer (New England Biolabs). The cleavage reaction was initiated with the addition of MboII or DNase I (1 U/reaction, New England Biolabs) enzyme. Digestion was carried out for 1 h at 37°C and reaction was terminated by adding 10 mM EDTA. The samples were deproteinized due to proteinase K (10 μg/reaction) in the presence of 0.05% SDS for 15 min at 65°C. Samples pre-incubated with 10 mM EDTA and 0.05% SDS were used as a negative control. The digested products were separated on 1.2% agarose gel and run in 1× TAE buffer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cryptosporidium Species Detection and Genotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Cryptosporidium spp. in the specimens were detected by nested PCR amplification of a ∼830 bp fragment of the ssrRNA gene, and were genotyped by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of the secondary PCR products, using restriction enzymes SspI and MboII (New England BioLabs, MA, USA) (Feng et al., 2007 (link)). To identify the C. parvum subtype involved, a ∼850 bp fragment of the gp60 gene was amplified by nested PCR (Feng et al., 2009 (link)). Each specimen was analysed twice by PCR at each genetic locus. Reagent-grade water was used as the negative control, whereas Cryptosporidium canis DNA was used as the positive control for the ssrRNA PCR and Cryptosporidium hominis DNA as the positive control for the gp60 PCR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Fungal DNA Extraction and AMF Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fungal DNA was extracted from freeze‐dried homogenized root material (10–20 mg), following the Plant DNeasy mini kit protocol (Qiagen). A region of the small subunit rRNA was amplified using a FAM labeled general eukaryotic forward primer NS31 (5′‐TTG GAG GGC AAG TCT GGT GCC‐3′) (Simon, Lalonde, & Bruns, 1992 (link)) and AMF‐specific reverse primer AML2 (5′‐GAA CCC AAA CAC TTT GGT TTC C‐3′) (Lee, Lee, & Young, 2008 (link)) (see Supporting Information for details). PCR products were triple‐digested with the restriction enzymes HpyCHIV, MboII, and Sau96I (New England Biolabs, Inc) (see Supporting Information for details). Genotyping was carried out on an ABI 3730 PRISM® capillary DNA analyser (Applied Biosystems). T‐RFLP data was analyzed using Genemapper software v. 5 (Applied Biosystems). The SSU sequences of AMF species commonly associated with agricultural soils were downloaded from GenBank and virtually digested with RestrictionMapper v. 3, to associate T‐RF’s with potential AMF species.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Mutation Analysis of cyOsPPDK Gene in Rice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The coding sequence of cyOsPPDK in Namil(SA)-flo1 and Namil was compared using the CLC Sequence Viewer 7.0 (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). To verify the mutation site, a CAPS marker containing two MboII restriction sites in the floury endosperm mutant Namil(SA)-flo1 and one MboII restriction site in Namil was developed using the WatCut program. A 177 bp fragment containing the mutation site was PCR amplified from Namil(SA)-flo1 and Namil using the primers flo4-5_F: CTCCAGTGGGTGGAGGAGTA and flo4-5_R: GATCGATCAGCAACGGAGAT. The PCR products were digested with MboII (New England Biolabs) in a volume of 15 μL containing 5 μL of PCR product, 1.5 μL of 10× NEBuffer, 0.5 μL of MboII, and 8 μL of ultrapure water, and then incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. The digestion products were separated using the Fragment Analyzer™ (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The CAPS marker was also used for co-segregation analysis of F3:4 families and 44 Korean rice cultivars with the endosperm phenotype. The complete genomic DNA of the cyOsPPDK gene was cloned in three overlapping segments using primers designed on the basis of the cyOsPPDK gene sequence of Nipponbare (Table S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!