The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Fcs express 6 flow research edition

Manufactured by De Novo Software
Sourced in United States

FCS Express 6 Flow Research Edition is a software application designed for the analysis of flow cytometry data. It provides a comprehensive suite of tools for data visualization, gating, and statistical analysis. The software is capable of processing and analyzing data from various flow cytometry platforms.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using fcs express 6 flow research edition

1

Flow Cytometry of Lung Draining Lymph Nodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All fluorochrome-labelled monoclonal antibodies used in surface staining were titrated prior to use in order to determine the optimal antibody dilution for the surface marker detection by flow cytometry (data not shown). Lung draining lymph nodes (LN) cells were stained and analyzed with the combinations of the monoclonal antibodies: Cluster of differentiation (CD)3-PerCP-Cy5.5 rat anti-mouse (1:200; cat. no. 561609) and CD4-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC; 1:200; cat. no. 553650; both BD Pharmingen; BD Biosciences). The single cell suspensions were centrifuged (300 × g for 10 min at 4°C) and re-suspended in FACS staining buffer [PBS + 0.5% bovine serum albumin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. Waltham, MA, USA) + 0.05% sodium azide]. Following staining, the samples were scanned using a flow cytometer (BD FACS Canto II) and analyzed using FCS Express 6 Flow Research Edition (De Novo Software, Glendale, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Macrophage Uptake of Extracellular Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BMDMs and human macrophages were differentiated, as described above. Differentiated macrophages were resuspended in EV-free DMEM medium and aliquoted into microfuge tubes. Cells (5 × 105) were incubated with 40 µg of DiO-labeled EVs, 40 µg of unlabeled EVs, a combination of 20 µg of DiO-labeled and 20 µg of unlabeled EVs, or no EVs for 45 min at 37 °C under 5% CO2. Cells were centrifuged at 300×g for 10 min to eliminate unbound EVs. Macrophages were resuspended in 250 µl of EV-free DMEM medium and labeled with either APC-labeled anti-mouse F4/80 antibodies (Invitrogen MF48005; 1:100) or APC/Cy7-labeled anti-human CD11b (Biolegend 301341; 1:100) and APC anti-human CD14 (eBioscience 17-0149-41; 1:100) for 30 min at RT. Three replicates were left unlabeled as controls. Excess antibody was eliminated by centrifuging at 300×g for 10 min and resuspending cells in 1% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Cell fluorescent labeling was analyzed using a LSR II (BD Biosciences). Data was analyzed with FCS Express 6 Flow Research Edition (De Novo Software). Experiments were performed in the Flow and Mass Cytometry Core Facility of the University of Maryland School of Medicine Center for Innovative Biomedical Resources (CIBR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Immunophenotyping of Monocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry data was acquired by CytoFLEX S (Beckman Coulter) and analyzed with FCS Express 6 Flow Research Edition (DeNovo Software). The percentage of CD14 + monocytes and CD3 + lymphocytes from all CD45 + white blood cells were determined from the initial leukapheresis product and after monocyte enrichment. The cells were blocked with FcR Blocking Reagent (Miltenyi Biotec) and stained with CD45-PE, CD3-BV421 and CD14-APC antibodies and 7-AAD to assess viability. For all differentiated cells a total of 23 surface markers (CD10, CD11c, CD14, CD16, CD38, CD40, CD49c, CD51, CD71, CD80, CD83, CD85h, CD86, CD103, CD163, CD206, CD209, CD258, CD282, CD284, CD370, Syn3, VEGFR1) were determined as detailed in Supplementary Table S1. Extracellular markers were analyzed from live macrophages, defined as CD45-positive, viability dye (SYTOX Green) negative events. Normalized median fluorescence intensity (nMFI) was calculated by subtracting the nMFI for the CD45-only stain from each measurement. The normalized nMFIs were ordinated using linear discriminant analysis (LDA) using the MASS v7.3.51.433 package in R. For indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) intracellular staining cells were fixed and permeabilized using Intracellular Fixation and Permeabilization Buffer Set (eBioscience). The IDO signal was analyzed from CD33-positive, eFluor 660 Fixable Viability Dye-negative events.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Differentiated iPSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differentiated iPSCs were stained using Live/Dead stain (Invitrogen) to exclude dead cells from the analysis. Cells were permeabilized (Cytofix/Phosflow perm buffer III; BD Biosciences) and stained using the monoclonal antibodies 40/Oct-3 Alexa Fluor 647 anti-Oct3/4 (BD Biosciences), 658A5 Alexa Fluor 488 anti-PDX-1 (BD Biosciences), R11-560 PE anti-NKX6.1 (BD Biosciences) and T56-706 Alexa Fluor 647 anti-insulin (BD Biosciences). Analysis was carried out on a FACS-Canto flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed with FCS Express 6 Flow Research Edition (De Novo Software).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!