The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using kul01

1

Multiparametric Immune Profiling of Avian Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells isolated from the spleen, liver, and intestinal epithelium were stained with LIVE/DEAD Fixable Aqua Dead Cell Stain kit (L3457; Thermo Fisher, USA) and the following fluorescent antibodies to chicken CD3 (CT-3, Southern Biotech, USA), CD4 (CT-4, Southern Biotech, USA), CD8α (CT-8, Southern Biotech, USA), CD44 (AV6, Southern Biotech, USA), TCRγδ (TCR-1, Southern Biotech, USA), monocytes/macrophages (KUL01, Southern Biotech, USA), MHCII (2G11, Southern Biotech, USA), Bu-1 (AV20, Southern Biotech, USA), and CD45 (LT-40, Southern Biotech, USA). Stained cells were analyzed using a CytoFLEX flow cytometry and the data were analyzed using CytExpert Software (both from Beckman Coulter, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Immunohistochemistry of Jejunal Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Jejunal cryosections, 8 μm thick, were stained with specific antibodies using an indirect immunoperoxidase staining method as described by Schokker et al. [29 (link)]. Briefly, slides were treated for endogenous peroxidase activity, blocked with BSA, and incubated with monoclonal antibodies against CD4+ cells, CD8+ cells, or macrophage-like cells (CT-4, 1:200; CT-8, 1:200; and KUL01, 1:50, respectively; Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL), followed by peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse Ig (P0161, Dako, Denmark). Peroxidase activity was detected by 3,3-diaminobenzidine, and sections were counterstained with haematoxylin. Negative controls were performed by omitting of the primary antibody. For each sample 3 to 4 mm2 mucosa (without muscular layers) were evaluated by 10x magnification on a bright field microscope. Subsequently, the samples were further analysed using Olympus cellSens Dimension (version 1.7.1) software. First positive-stained cells were counted, secondly these cells were averaged per time point and group, and lastly they were represented as positive-cells per tissue area (square mm). A Student’s T-test was performed to calculate the significance between the treatment and control on each time-point separately.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunofluorescent Assay for Immune Cell Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunofluorescent Assay (IFA) to detect macrophages (KUL01+), CD4+ T cells, and CD8α+ T cells was performed as described previously [24 (link)]. In brief, the OCT preserved lung tissue sections were fixed in cold acetone for 5 min (min) and blocked in 5% goat serum diluted in a Trisma buffered saline (TBS) buffer at room temperature for 30 min. The primary antibodies, the mouse monoclonal antibody specific for chicken macrophages/monocytes, KUL01+ (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL, USA), CD8α (CT-8, Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL, USA), were used in a 1:200 dilution in a 5% goat serum for 30 min. Then, the secondary antibody, goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) conjugated with Dylight® 550 (Red fluorescence, Bethyl Laboratories Inc., Montgomery, TX, USA) was used for 1 h. For CD4+ staining, chicken CD4 antibody (CT-4, Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL, USA) was used as the primary antibody followed by biotinylated goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL, USA) used in a 1:250 dilution. Dylight® 488 (green fluorescence) streptavidin was used as a final step followed by mounting the slides with Vectashield® mounting medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories Inc., Burlingham, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multimodal Macrophage Visualization in Lung Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cryostat sections (8–10 μm) from embryonic tissues were mounted on Superfrost Ultra Plus slides (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, USA), air-dried, fixed with cold acetone for 10 minutes, stained with DAPI and mounted with FluorSave (Calbiochem, San Diego, USA). Macrophages in lung sections were visualized by immunofluorescence using a FITC labeled anti-chicken monocyte/macrophage antibody (KUL-01, SouthernBiotech, Birmingham, USA). To this end, sections were blocked with 2.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 hour, subsequently incubated with KUL-01 antibody (1:200) for 1 hour and counterstained with DAPI. To confirm fluorescent microscopy findings, sections were stained with antibodies against CATH-228 (link), FITC (Invitrogen, Waltham, USA) and TAMRA (Molecular Probes, Eugene, USA). Immunohistochemistry was performed as described by Van Dijk et al.28 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Identification and Isolation of Activated Chicken Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPF chicken PBMC and splenic monocytes/macrophages were identified as the mouse anti-chicken monocyte/macrophage-PE clone KUL01 (Southern Biotechnology Associates). Monocytes/macrophages were sorted and recycled from freshly isolated chicken PBMCs using mouse anti-chicken monocyte/macrophage-PE clone KUL01. The surface molecule reflecting chicken macrophage activation was MHC-II (Southern Biotechnology Associates). Activated macrophages were identified as KUL01 and MHC-II double positive.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemistry of Chicken Innate Immune Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The frozen sections were brought to room temperature and fixed in ice cold acetone for 5 min. The sections were blocked with 5% horse serum for 1 h at room temperature and treated with primary antibodies; rabbit anti-chicken TLR3 (Creative diagnostics, New York, USA), rabbit anti-chicken IFN-β (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Mississauga, ON, Canada), rabbit anti-chicken IFN-α (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Mississauga, ON, Canada) or mouse monoclonal antibody specific for chicken macrophages, KUL01 (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, Alabama, USA) at dilutions of 1:50–200 in the blocking buffer for 30–60 min at room temperature in a humidified chamber. As the secondary antibody for TLR3, IFN-α and IFN-β, VectaFluor™ Excel Amplified DyLight® 488 Anti-Rabbit IgG Kit (Vector Laboratories, ON, Canada) and, as the secondary antibody for macrophage staining, DyLight® 550 conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) (Bethyl Laboratories Inc., Montgomery, TX, USA) were used following the manufacture’s instruction. Nuclear staining was done using Vectashield mounting medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA), all the slides were cover slipped and sealed with lacquer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluating Probiotic Colonization in Chickens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
On the seventhday after ABX treatment, the chickens were gavaged with 100 µL (approximately 7 -10 8 per chicken) of Lactobacillusspp. or E. faecalis every day 5 dpi. Fecal samples were collected 48 h after bacterial treatment to determine the colonization e ciency.
Flow cytometry and Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) SPF chicken PBMC and splenic monocytes/macrophages were identi ed as the mouse anti-chicken monocyte/macrophage-PE clone KUL01 (Southern Biotechnology Associates). Monocytes/macrophages were sorted and recycled from freshly isolated chicken PBMCs using mouse anti-chicken monocyte/macrophage-PE clone KUL01.The surface molecule re ecting chicken macrophage activation was MHC-II (Southern Biotechnology Associates). Activated macrophages were identi ed as KUL01 and MHC-II double positive.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!