The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Aztec 3

Manufactured by Oxford Instruments
Sourced in United Kingdom, Japan

Aztec 3.0 is a software package developed by Oxford Instruments for data acquisition, processing, and analysis. It provides a comprehensive suite of tools for managing and interpreting data from various analytical techniques, including electron microscopy, X-ray analysis, and spectroscopy. The software offers a user-friendly interface and advanced algorithms for efficient data management and visualization.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using aztec 3

1

Cross-sectional Analysis of Corrosion and Biofilms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cross-sectional imaging and elemental analysis of the corrosion products and biofilms were done by scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS). One coupon was extracted from each reactor on day 40 and immediately placed in a glass cell for drying under nitrogen flow for 5 days. Subsequently, coupons were mounted in Epofix resin and one of the sides was dry polished to reveal the cross-sectional profile. Samples were coated with a platinum layer (5 nm thick), and surface analysis was performed using a Zeiss Neon high-resolution scanning electron microscope. Images were collected using 20 kV and the backscatter detector. Aztec 3.0 software (Oxford Instruments NanoAnalysis) was used for the data analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Electrospun Fiber Surface Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electrospun fibers’ surface morphology among membrane groups was analyzed before and after tBOC treatment by SEM (NOVA NanoSEM 650, FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA) and EDS analysis (Oxford Instruments NanoAnalysis, USA). Membranes were attached to a SEM stub with double-sided, conductive tape and sputter-coated with 5 nm gold-palladium.
Images were taken between 500× and 5000× magnification. Images of three sample locations per membrane and 20 fiber measurements per representative image of the membrane were taken to determine the uniformity of fiber morphology and average fiber diameter. Fiber analysis was conducted using ImageJ-Fiji analysis software, an open source plugin package for ImageJ. software (Fiji: version 2.9.0, developer(s): J. Schindelin et al., https://fiji.sc/; Image-J: National Institutes of Health, Madison, WI, USA).
EDS data was collected to determine TFA salt removal from spun membranes before and after the tBOC treatment via the F-peak. EDS was also used to determine MgP incorporation via the detection of the magnesium and phosphorus peaks. Spectra were analyzed via Aztec 3.0 software (Oxford Instruments, Abington, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Characterization of NiHCF-Covered GCE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surface morphology of the NiHCF‐covered GCE electrode were studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, FEI Helios NanoLabTM 600 DualBeamTM). Elemental composition of the electrodeposited NiHCF thin films were studied using EDXA. The accelerating voltage used to stimulate the X‐ray emission was 15 keV. X‐rays with energies between 0 and 10 keV were collected and used in identification of the elements using AZTEC 3.3 software from Oxford instruments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Analyzing Implant Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The internal and external morphology of the implants before and after exposure to the release medium was studied using a JEOL Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (JSM-7800F, Japan), equipped with the Aztec 3.3 software (Oxford Instruments, Oxfordshire, UK). Samples were fixed with a ribbon carbon double-sided adhesive and covered with a fine chrome (Cr) layer. In the case of implants which had been exposed to the release medium before observation, the systems were treated as described for the in vitro release studies described above. At predetermined time points, implant samples were withdrawn, optionally cut with a scalpel and freeze-dried (as described in section 2.8. Implant erosion and PLGA degradation).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!