The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Rstudio integrated development for r

Manufactured by Posit
Sourced in United States

RStudio is an integrated development environment (IDE) for the R programming language. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for writing, testing, and executing R code, as well as managing R projects and packages. RStudio's core function is to offer a user-friendly interface for working with the R language, simplifying the development process for R users.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using rstudio integrated development for r

1

Incidence Rate Ratio Meta-analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To pool the incidence of outcomes across all the selected studies, the R software (RStudio: Integrated Development for R; RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA, USA) using the “metarate” function was used to derive the incidence rate ratio in 100 patient-years. A random-effects model was used to circumvent heterogeneity so that no particular study was given a higher weightage. The outcome data were transformed by the logarithmic method to increase their statistical value and back-transformed to proportions using the “escal” function in “metafor.”15 (link) Forest plots were drawn with proportional measures and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model. Study heterogeneity was expressed as I2. Influencing and outlier studies were looked for, and sensitivity analyses were conducted. Univariate and multivariate logarithmic covariate analyses of the outcomes were performed using the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) function. R2 was used to estimate the heterogeneity accounted for, and a bubble plot was drawn to visualize the moderator effects.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

APOE ε4 Allele Status Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A combination of software packages was used for analyses, including SPSS Statistics version 22.0 (IBM Corp), RStudio: Integrated Development for R (RStudio Inc), and SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc). Two-sided significance was set at α = .05 (type I error rate). Standard summary measures were used to describe demographic and clinical characteristics for the sample, stratified by APOE ε4 allele status, with group comparisons obtained through t tests for continuous variables and χ2 tests for categorical variables.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Impact of COVID-19 on Endophthalmitis Management

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed utilizing RStudio: Integrated Development for R (RStudio, Inc., RStudio Team (2018), Boston, Massachusetts, https://www.rstudio.com). The primary outcomes were the fraction of endophthalmitis etiology, days to presentation, initial management, subsequent PPV, and VA outcomes between the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 groups. Secondary outcomes included the microbial spectrum, and the rate of post-injection endophthalmitis between the pre-COVID-19 versus the COVID-19 cohorts. Snellen VA was converted to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR) VA for statistical analysis. Vision levels of count fingers, hand motion, light perception, and no light perception were assigned LogMAR values of 2.3, 2.6, 2.9, and 3.2, respectively, as established by prior studies.[25 (link)] Fisher's exact test was employed to compare categorical variables between the pre-COVID-19 group and the COVID-19 group. A Wilcoxon rank sum test was performed to compare VA outcomes, days to presentation, and follow-up duration. Statistical significance was determined based on an alpha level of < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics software version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) and RStudio: Integrated Development for R (RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA). Results are expressed as average or its percentage with their corresponding 95% confidence interval.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analyses in Oncology Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Through the SPSS statistical software package (standard version 18.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) or RStudio (v.3.6.1, RStudio Team, 2016; RStudio Integrated Development for R; RStudio, Inc., Boston, USA), we conducted statistical analyses. Student’s t-test or chi-square test was applied to the analysis of group differences using SPSS. Combining Kaplan–Meier curves with log-rank tests with the “survival” R package, we analyzed survival results. Pearson correlation was used to analyze genes co-expressed with eRNAs in various tumors using RStudio. A p < 0.05 denoted statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Mouse Xenograft Tumor Growth Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mouse xenograft study had five mice per treatment group, each bearing one tumor. Tumor volumes were log-transformed to meet the normality assumption, and growth curves were compared using a linear-mixed effects model with mice-specific effect as a random variable. P values were adjusted using Bonferroni correction. For the clonogenic survival assays, dose-response curve IC50 values for EGCG or Pro-EGCG in combination with cisplatin met distributional assumptions. Statistical comparisons were performed by two-sided unpaired t-test followed by Holm’s post-hoc analysis. Data analyses were completed using R version 3.5.0. and RStudio: Integrated Development for R (version 1.1.447, RStudio Inc.; Boston, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Densitometry Analysis of N2a Cell Lysates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the densitometry analysis of the western blots of the N2a cell lysates, a paired t test was used. The statistical analysis was performed using the GraphPad Prism 8 software and p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results from the densitometry analysis of the brains fractions were analyzed using RStudio version 2021.9.1.372 (RStudio Team, 2020) with p < 0.05 used as a statistical threshold. We performed an ANCOVA comparing levels of insoluble FLNA between non-AD subjects and subjects with AD with age, sex, APOE ε4 carrier status, and study batch as covariates (RStudio Team, RStudio: Integrated Development for R, RStudio, Boston, MA, 2020, http://www.rstudio.com/). The association between insoluble FLNA and total insoluble Tau concentrations and the ratio of phosphorylated insoluble Tau over total insoluble Tau were tested using partial correlations with age, sex, and study batch as covariates. Insoluble FLNA levels adjusted for age, sex, and study batch were then correlated with Braak stages with a Spearman correlation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Postural Sway, Intrinsic Stiffness, and Baseline Torque

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed with RStudio: Integrated Development for R (Version 1.1.453, RStudio Team, 2016, RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA, USA). Descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) were generated to describe the profile of the sample. Coefficient of variation (CV) was used to determine relative variability between participants in these different conditions. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used for each variable to verify if the conditions of increasing platform tilt (normal, sine 0.2 and sine 0.4) and increased perturbation amplitude (0.2 and 0.9 deg) induced significant changes in average intrinsic stiffness, postural sway and baseline torque. Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) was used to verify the relationship between these 3 variables to answer the main question of this study, i.e. is sway related to stiffness and torque. Following suggestion by Cohen [36 (link)], we considered 0.3≤r<0.5 a moderate correlation, and r≥0.5 a strong correlation. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant for all tests.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!