The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

78 protocols using aria fusion

1

Flow Cytometry Gating and Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry was performed with antibodies listed in Supplementary Table 2. Dead cells (identified using 7-AAD Viability Staining Solution or Zombie NIR Fixable Viability Kit; both from BioLegend) and cell aggregates (identified on FSC-A versus FSC-H scatter plots) were excluded from all analyses. For intracellular staining, surface-labelled cell suspensions were fixed using eBioscience Foxp3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set or eBioscience IC Fixation Buffer (both from Thermo Fisher). HMOX-1 expressing cells were detected with anti-HMOX-1 antibody coupled to PE using the Lightning-Link conjugation kit (abcam). Data acquisition was performed on an Aria-II SORP, ARIA-Fusion or LSR-Fortessa (BD Biosciences) and analysed using FlowJo software (BD Biosciences). Sorting was performed on an Aria-II SORP or ARIA-Fusion (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Uptake and Fate of NBTXR3 Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
42-MG-BA parental cells seeded in T150 flask were treated with 400 µM of NBTXR3RED particles. The next day, 42-MG-BA NBTXR3RED positive cells were cell sorted by flow cytometry (AriaFusion, BD Biosciences) to discard remaining non-endocytosed NBTXR3RED nanoparticles. Isolated 42-MG-BA NBTXR3RED cells were then seeded in T25 flasks and irradiated or not, with 4 × 10 Gy. Right after the last fraction, 42-MG-BA-ACTB-GFP cells were added to irradiated 42-MG-BA NBTXR3RED cells and incubated for 3 days. Then, the presence of NBTXR3RED particles in 42-MG-BA-ACTB-GFP cells was assessed by flow cytometry (Accuri C6 Plus, BD Biosciences). Meanwhile, 42-MG-BA-ACTB-GFP and NBTXR3RED positive cells were cell sorted (AriaFusion, BD Biosciences) and processed for TEM analysis as previously described.
For fluorescence microscopy analysis, the experiments were processed as previously described except that cells were seeded in µ-Dish 35 mm petri to allow microscopy acquisition. Images were acquired with a fluorescent microscope (Zeiss Microscope AXIO Observer.D1) and processed with ImageJ Software (v1.52a).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Single-cell sorting of immune cells from mouse epididymis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ten 10-week-old male wild type C57BL/6J mice were intravenously injected with an APC/Cyanine 7-conjugated anti-mouse CD45.2 antibody (Clone 104, BioLegend 109824, RRID: AB_830789) 5 min prior to euthanasia by CO2 inhalation. Single-cell suspensions of epididymal regions (IS, caput, corpus, cauda) were prepared as previously described (see ‘Cell preparation and surface staining for flow cytometry’), with inclusion of 60 U/ml hyaluronidase type I-S (Sigma, H3506) in the digestion buffer. Cells were stained with a PerCP-Cyanine 5.5-conjugated CD45.1 antibody (BioLegend 110728, RRID: AB_893346). Stained single-cell suspensions of all mice were pooled to obtain enough immune cells for sorting. Single live CD45.1+CD45.2- immune cells were sorted on the BD Aria Fusion (BD Bioscience) for scRNASeq.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

CRISPR-Mediated Integration of Optogenetic Modules

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AAVS1-CAG-hrGFP was a gift from Su-Chun Zhang (Addgene plasmid No. 52344; http://n2t.net/addgene:52344; RRID:Addgene_52344).12 (link) CAG::PSAML141F,Y115F:GlyR-IRES-GFP was a gift from Scott Sternson (Addgene plasmid No. 32480; http://n2t.net/addgene:32480; RRID:Addgene_32480).13 (link) Inhibitory luminopsin 4 (iLMO4) plasmids were a gift from Ute Hochgeschwender (Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI).14 (link) The plasmid vectors contained pharmacologically selective actuator moduleL141F,Y115 fused to the glycine receptor chloride-selective ion pore domain (PSAM-GlyR) or iLMO4 under the control of a CAG promoter, homology arms (≈800 bp in size each) for the AAVS1 locus, and a puromycin resistance cassette upstream of the promoter. PSAM-GlyR was linked to EGFP (enhanced green fluorescent protein) by a 2A linker. Nucleofection with the Cas9 ribonucleoprotein was conducted using a 4D-Nucleofector (Lonza) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The selected single guide RNA targeted the AAVS1 between Exon 1 and 2 (Figure S1) and was designed using CRISPOR (http://crispor.tefor.net). Positively edited cells were enriched by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS; BD Aria Fusion), seeded as single cells and expanded to cell banks.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

PBMC Immunophenotyping by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PBMC samples were stained with fluorescently labelled antibodies (Table S6) and sorted with BD ARIA Fusion with a 70-μm nozzle according to the gating strategy indicated (Fig S1).

Table S6. Antibodies.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Purification of Immune Cell Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were sorted into subsets at the University of Birmingham. The PBMCs were first thawed as described in the Supplementary Data, http://links.lww.com/HC9/A236. CD14+ monocytes were then selected using human CD14 MicroBeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Woking, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions; CD14+ cell pellets were frozen at −80°C until RNA extraction. Non-CD14+ cells were resuspended in PBS and stained with live/dead marker (Zombie APC-Cy7 at 1:1000; Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) for 20 minutes at room temperature. Cells were washed and stained with the following fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies (BD Biosciences, UK): CD3-APC, CD4-PECF594, CD127-PECy7, CD25-BB515, CXCR3-PerCP-Cy5.5, CCR6-BV421, and CD19-PE for fluorescent-associated cell sorting (using BD Aria Fusion, BD, UK) of the immune cell subsets: (1) CD19+CD3 B cells, (2) CD3+CD4+CD25highCD127low TREG cells, (3) CD3+CD4+CCR6+CXCR3 TH17 cells, and (4) CD3+CD4+CCR6CXCR3+ TH1 cells (Fig. S2, http://links.lww.com/HC9/A236). We used an anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody that did not induce T-cell activation (Fig. S3, http://links.lww.com/HC9/A236). All immune cell subsets were sorted into tubes containing RPMI−1640+10% FCS media kept at 4°C during the sorting period. After sorting, cells were pelleted and resuspended in RLT+βME buffer for lysis and RNA extraction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunophenotypic Isolation of HSCs and HPCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MNC or CD34 enriched samples were centrifuged and resuspended in PBS/3%FBS containing an antibody panel consisting of: CD3/FITC, CD90/PE, CD49f/PECy5, CD38/PECy7, CD33/APC, CD19/A700, CD34/APCCy7, CD45RA/BV421 and Zombie/Aqua. Cells were stained (30 min at 4 °C) in the dark before washing and resuspension in PBS/3%FBS for cell sorting. For all samples, HSC/MPP pool cells (LinCD34+CD38CD45RA) were sorted using either a BD Aria III or BD Aria Fusion cell sorter (BD Biosciences) at the NIHR Cambridge BRC Cell Phenotyping hub. The gating strategy is illustrated in Extended Data Fig. 1b. The HSC/MPP population was treated as a single entity and not further subclassified in the analysis. The immunophenotypic HSC/MPP population includes both long-term, intermediate-term and short-term HSCs as well as multipotent progenitors, as demonstrated functionally in xenotransplantation assays51 (link)–54 (link).
In a subset of individuals, a small number of HPCs (LinCD34+CD38+) were also sorted. The antibody panel used is shown in Supplementary Table 2. The HPC cells were treated as a single entity in the analysis and not further subclassified. The immunophenotypic HPC compartment includes predominantly myeloid and erythroid progenitors.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Flow Cytometry Analysis of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data for the following parameters were collected on the BD LSR II: forward scatter (FSC), side scatter (SSC) and SFGFP (33 (link)) fluorescence (488 nm excitation, 515–545 nm emission). Three to 10 ul of each sample was measured in high throughput mode. Each sample was required to have at least 5000 counts, but most had 10 000–50 000. Counts were gated in FSC versus SSC by choosing a window surrounding the largest cluster of cells. SFGFP fluorescence values were recorded in relative channel number (1–262,144 corresponding to 18-bit data) and the geometric mean over the gated data was calculated for each sample. Data for Figure 2C was collected on a BD Aria Fusion for the following parameters: forward scatter (FSC), side scatter (SSC), SFGFP fluorescence (488 nm excitation, 530 nm emission), and mRFP Fluorescence (561 nm excitation, 582 nm emission). SFGFP and mRFP fluorescence values were recorded in relative channel number (1–262,144 corresponding to 18-bit data) and the geometric mean over the gated data was calculated for each sample. Compensation was calculated automatically by the BD Aria FACSDiva software using the compensation setup feature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Isolation and Characterization of GBM Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GBM cells were labeled with phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated monoclonal antibodies against human CD133 (CD133/2-PE, Milteny Bio) and FITC-conjugated monoclonal antibodies against human CD15 (CD15-FITC, Milteny Bio) at 4 °C for 10 min per manufacturer’s instructions, as we described previously [18 (link)]. Cells were then washed and resuspended in a stem cell growth medium consisting of Neurobasal media (Invitrogen), N2 and B27 supplements (0.5× each; Invitrogen), human recombinant bFGF and EGF (50 ng/mL each; R&D Systems) [3 (link)], penicillin G, and streptomycin sulfate (1:100; GIBCO-Invitrogen). CD133+/CD15+, CD133+, CD15+and CD133/CD15 cells were then flow-sorted with BD Aria Fusion. Dead cells were excluded by propidium iodide (PI) staining [18 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

RNA-seq Analysis of Liver Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gene expression analysis was carried out on liver macrophages using fluorescent activated cell sorting (FACS) followed by mRNA extraction (BD Aria Fusion). Briefly, cells were sorted into cold PBS, pelleted and resuspended in TRIzol for cell lysis followed by chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Mississauga, ON, Canada). Isolated mRNA was quantified using Nanodrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Mississauga, ON, Canada). Normalized concentrations of mRNA were then hybridized and sequenced using the preassembled Mouse Inflammation v2 gene profiling CodeSet and nCounter platform according to the manufacturers protocol (Nanostring Technologies, Seattle, WA, USA). Data was analyzed using nSolver software provided by Nanostring Technologies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!