The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss 18.0 statistical

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS 18.0 is a statistical software package developed by IBM. It provides a range of tools for data analysis, including data manipulation, statistical modeling, and reporting. The software supports a variety of data types and offers a user-friendly interface for analyzing and interpreting data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

142 protocols using spss 18.0 statistical

1

Arterial Stiffness and CVD Risk

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using SPSS 18.0 statistical software. Each variable was assessed for a normal distribution. Continuous variables were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median (inter-quartile range[25-75%]) and were compared using the one-way ANOVA or KruskaleWallis H test. Categorical variables were presented as numbers and proportions and were compared using the chi-square test. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the significance of variables in arterial stiffness and the 10-year CVD risk after adjusting for other confounding risk factors. The metabolic status interaction between BMI and baPWV was assessed using generalized linear models (GLMs). Significance tests were two-tailed, and a p value < 0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 18.0 statistical software. The data are expressed as means ± SEM and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the differences among groups. The comparison between two different groups was performed by t test and differences were considered statistically significant if P<0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comparative Analysis of Soil Microbiomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Standard errors are indicated and Student’s two-tailed t-test was used for experimental comparisons. A single asterisk () indicates that the difference is statistically significant at P < 0.05 while double asterisks (∗∗) indicate that the difference is statistically significant at P < 0.01. Treatments with different letters are significantly different at the 0.05 probability level, with the statistical analysis performed by comparing means in the SPSS 18.0 statistical package.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

ANOVA Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by LSD test was used to determine significance between different groups. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data shown were representative of at least three independent experiments. All data analysis was carried out with SPSS 18.0 statistical software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Coronary Restenosis Genetic Risk Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SPSS 18.0 statistical package was used for statistical analyses. Gene linkage disequilibrium was analyzed by SHEsis software (http://analysis.bio-x.cn/myAnalysis.php). Gene frequency was calculated for all genotypes or alleles, and the difference among groups was performed using multiple group comparison. Data for continuous variables were presented as mean value±standard deviation (SD). Depending on data types, non-parametric Mann-Whitney test or chi-square test were used for testing the differences among the groups. In addition to univariate analysis, multivariate Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the correlation of coronary restenosis with geographic factors (gender and age), comorbidity (hypertension and diabetes), lifestyle (smoking and alcohol drinking), lipid profiling, renal function (creatinine) and RAS gene polymorphisms. For multivariate logistic regression analysis, odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. In all analyses, p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPSS18.0 statistical software was used to process the data. The measurement data are expressed by the mean standard deviation (±s), which all conform to the normality test, and two independent samples are used for t-test. The inter-group count data were expressed by (%), and Pearson χ2 test was used. and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for rank data between groups. P < 0.05 was considered a statistically significant difference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Statistical Analysis of Ophthalmic Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis of all the variables including visual acuity, IOP, corneal endothelium, and hexagonal cell ratios before surgery, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery, was performed using SPSS 18.0 statistical software. Both the Quantile-Quantile plot and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (P > .05) showed a normal distribution for parameters such as visual acuity, corneal endothelial cells, and intraocular pressure. Statistical analysis of the preoperative and postoperative data was performed using the paired t test. Statistical analysis among multiple groups was performed using analysis of variance. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.
Vision was converted to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) vision to facilitate statistical analysis. The standard logMAR visual acuity with hand motion and finger count is 2.4 and 2.1, respectively.[10 (link)]
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Survival Analysis of SIRT2 Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were carried out using the SPSS 18.0 statistical software package. All data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA with a Bonferroni correction, followed by Fisher's exact test. Bivariate correlations were calculated by Spearman's rank correlation coefficients. Kaplan-Meier curves were sued to analyze the patient survival by SIRT2 levels. All values are depicted as mean ± standard deviation and are considered significant if p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Nonparametric Statistical Analysis of Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were statistically analyzed using SPSS 18.0 statistical software. The data were expressed as median, and the overall variance analysis was carried out using nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis H and Mann-Whitney U tests, as the data obtained were not consistent with normal distribution and variance was not homogeneous. P-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Bone Cement Leakage Risk Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS 18.0 statistical software. The normally distributed measurement data are represented by ‾x ± s. The comparisons of the indicators between the two groups were performed by the t-test and χ2 test. Binary logistic multiple regression analysis was used to assess the correlations. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A ROC curve was generated, and the area under the curve and cut-off value of PSBCV/VCV% were calculated to assess the correlation between the PSBCV/VCV% and the presence of bone cement leakage in the paravertebral vein.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!