The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sonicator

Manufactured by Bioventus
Sourced in United States

The Sonicator is a piece of laboratory equipment used for the mechanical disruption of cells, tissues, and other biological samples. It utilizes high-frequency sound waves to break down the structural integrity of the target material, enabling the extraction and isolation of cellular components or other analytes of interest.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

21 protocols using sonicator

1

RNA Isolation and qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For RNA isolation from whole hippocampus, hypothalamus, or cortex, tissues were homogenized with a sonicator (Misonix; Farmingdale, NY) in the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). Total RNA was isolated following the manufacturer’s instruction. For RNA isolation from cultured cells or brain microglia, the RNeasy kit (Qiagen) was used. RNA concentration was determined with a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Denville; S. Plainfield, NJ). Reverse transcription was performed using a High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA). qPCR was performed using the Applied Biosystems Taqman Gene Expression Assay-on-Demand Gene Expression protocol. In brief, the amount of cDNA was measured by an ABI PRISM 7500 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems) by real-time PCR and normalized based on reference cDNA levels (GAPDH). Relative gene expression was analyzed using the ΔΔCT method and results were expressed as fold difference from GAPDH.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Analysis of ArfGAP1 Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were extracted from 100 μg of brain tissue after homogenization using 100 μl of 20mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7,5), sonicated (Misonix Sonicator, USA), centrifuged and protein concentration in the supernatant was assayed using the Nano Drop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Aliquots of the extract containing 50 μg protein were separated by reducing SDS-PAGE (10%) and electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes. The blots were blocked by using 0,2% EZ-block solution (Biological Industries, USA) in PBS Tris-buffered salt with Tween-20 (PBST). The blots were incubated overnight at 4°C with rabbit anti-ArfGAP1 antibody (1:1000, ab183746, AbCam, UK) and rabbit ArfGAP1 antibodies against the insertion peptide that is present in the brain/heart isoforms previously generated by us [2 (link)](1:3000), then incubated in goat-anti-rabbit secondary antibody-conjugated horseradish peroxide (1:2500, Sigma-Aldrich). Proteins were visualized by chemiluminescence using the Clarity Western ECL Substrate (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA). To ensure even loading of the samples, the same membrane was probed with rabbit anti-GAPDH antibody (1:1000, AbCam). The analysis was performed by Image Quant LAS 4000 (GE HealthCare Life Science, USA). The intensity of the ArfGAP1 band in each sample was normalized relative to GAPDH.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Subcellular Fractionation of HPAEpiCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPAEpiCs were harvested, sonicated for 5 s at output 1.5 with a sonicator (Misonix, Farmingdale, NY), and centrifuged at 8000 revolution/min for 15 min at 4 °C. The pellet was collected as the nuclear fraction. The supernatant was centrifuged at 14,000 revolution/min at 4 °C for 60 min to yield the pellet (membrane fraction) and the supernatant (cytosolic fraction).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Soluble Chromatin Generation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The generation of soluble chromatin was described previously (9 (link)). The cultures were cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature, mixing occasionally. The cells were then collected with centrifugation and washed. The cells were again collected with centrifugation, transferred to a microcentrifuge tube and collected with centrifugation. The cell pellet was flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. The cell pellets were resuspended in 400 μl sFA-140 lysis buffer [sFA-140 refers to the FA-140 buffer used for Saccharomyces cerevisiae; 50 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.5; 140 mM NaCl; 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA); 0.1% Triton X-100 and 0.1% sodium deoxycholate]. The cells were lysed by bead-beating with glass beads (BioSpec 11079105). The lysate was separated from the beads and sonicated (Misonix sonicator: Power 6, 10 s, six times with 10-s rest) to shear the chromatin. Directly after sonication, the lysate was placed on dry ice for 10 s. The lysates were centrifuged for 5 min at 4°C at top speed and then for 10 min at 4°C at top speed to separate soluble and insoluble chromatin (∼400 μl). Twenty five microliters (6.25%) of soluble chromatin was removed and processed for DNA input using a PCR purification kit (Qiagen 28106). The remaining soluble chromatin can be immediately used for the immunoprecipitation or it can be stored at −20°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Bacterial Lipid Extraction and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacterial biomass from the stationary phase of growth (the samples were withdrawn from 120-h-old cultures) was separated from culture media by centrifugation at 4,000×g. It was homogenized (Misonix Sonicator) with 10 ml of a CHCl3–MeOH mixture (2:1, v/v). A total of 30 µl of IS solution was poured into each sample before extraction. To the crushed cells 2 ml of 0.8 % NaCl was added, the vials were vortexed for 1 min and centrifuged. The lower organic phase was collected, treated with anhydrous sodium sulphate, and evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was then re-dissolved in 2 ml of methanol/CHCl3 (4:1, v/v) and stored at −20 °C pending analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Cytosolic and Nuclear Fractionation of bEnd.3 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The assay was performed by the method with modifications, as described previously [31 (link)]. bEnd.3 cells were seeded onto culture dishes (10-cm). The cells were starved for 24 h in DMEM/F-12 medium without FBS when they reached 90% confluence. After incubation with 10 μM 15d-PGJ2 for the time intervals, the cells were washed once with ice-cold PBS and scraped into a 1.5 mL tube with 1 mL of PBS added to each dish. Cells were collected by centrifuge at 8000 rpm for 5 min. The pellets were suspended with 300 μL Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagent I (CREI). The suspension was broken by syringes. After being put on ice for 30 min, the lysates were centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 10 min. The pellet was collected as the nucleus fraction and the supernatant as a cytosol fraction. The pellets were resuspended and then sonicated for 5 s twice using a sonicator (Misonix, Farmingdale, NY, USA). The protein concentration of each sample was measured. Samples from these fractions (200 μL protein) were denatured and subjected to SDS-PAGE using a 12% (w/v) running gel. The levels of translocation were identified and quantified by Western blot analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Histone Modifications Profiling via ChIP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were pelleted and resuspended in 500 μl of PBS containing 20 mM sodium butyrate. Cells were fixed at room temperature with 1% formaldehyde for 8 minutes, and then quenched with 1.25 M glycine. Cells were sonicated using Misonix sonicator under the following conditions to obtain chromatin fragments between 200–700 bp size: Hepatocytes– 65 Amplitude (4 pulses with 1 minute interval between each pulse which was of 16 seconds with 1 second on and 1 second off); Lin- BM cells– 40 Amplitude (1 pulse of 10 minutes with 30 seconds on and 30 seconds off). ChIP was performed using Low cell ChIP kit from Diagenode (Seraing, Belgium) according to the manufacturer’s protocol using the specific antibodies. Antibodies used for ChIP (anti-JMJD3, anti-EZH2, anti-H3K4me3, anti-H3K9Ac, anti-H3K9me3, anti-H3K27me3, rabbit IgG) were procured from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Analysis of ChIP samples was carried out by real-time qPCR using the primers (S2 Table) and the efficiency of chromatin immuno-precipitation was calculated as percentage of input (ChIP/Total input) = 2[(Ct(1% input)–log2 (dilution factor))—Ct(ChIP)] x 100%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation of NK and B Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary human peripheral blood NK cells or B cells were cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde and sheared with a Misonix sonicator. Input and phenol chloroform-extracted DNA was isolated from 5 × 106 cell equivalents of chromatin according to published methods (Simon et al., 2012 (link)), and open chromatin was assessed by qRT-PCR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Subcellular Fractionation by Sonication

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After treatment, harvested cells were sonicated for 5 s at output 1.5 with a sonicator (Misonix, Farmingdale, NY, United States). Then, the cell lysates were centrifuged at 8,000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C. Both the pellet and supernatant were collected, respectively. The pellet was saved as the nuclear fraction. The supernatant was saved for further centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 60 min at 4°C. The pellet and the supernatant were respectively collected as membrane fraction and cytosolic fraction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Western Blot Analysis of 3T3-L1 Adipocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3T3-L1 adipocytes were scraped into a lysis buffer containing 40 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 120 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaF, 1.5 mM Na3VO4, 10 mM β–glycerophosphate, and 1% Triton X-100, supplemented with EDTA-free phosphatase and a protease inhibitor cocktail (#78441; Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Next, the cells were lysed by sonication twice for 15 sec on ice using a sonicator (Misonix, Farmingdale, NY, USA). After centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C, the supernatants were boiled in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) loading buffer at 90°C for 5 min, after which they were loaded (20 μg protein per lane) onto 8% or 12% Tris-glycine gels. Following electrophoresis, the proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes, which were blocked using 5% skim milk in TBST buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 125 m NaCl, 0.5% Tween 20) for 1 h. The blocked membranes were incubated with primary antibodies in TBST overnight at 4°C, followed by incubation with secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. Finally, the membranes were visualized using a chemiluminescence reagent (Amersham Bioscience, Piscataway, NJ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!