The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Kr 8100pa

Manufactured by Topcon
Sourced in Japan

The KR-8100PA is a compact, autorefractor/keratometer produced by Topcon. It is designed to measure refractive error and corneal curvature for clinical applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using kr 8100pa

1

Postoperative Pterygium Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The patients’ subjective symptoms and surgical wound status were recorded at postoperative days 1 and 7 and 1, 3, and 6 months, or more often when clinically indicated. Snellen visual acuity was converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units for analyses. The degree of astigmatism and refractive errors were measured using an automated keratometer (KR8100PA, Topcon, Tokyo, Japan). Pterygial recurrence was defined as the presence of fibrovascular tissue crossing the limbus (corneal recurrence) at 6 months postoperatively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Eye Examination in Healthy Volunteers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One hundred forty-eight student volunteers from Kitasato University were recruited. The study followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki, and written informed consent was obtained from each participant after receiving approval from the Ethics Committee of Kitasato University School of Allied Health Science (No. 2012-07).
All the volunteers underwent comprehensive ophthalmic examinations including noncycloplegic refraction testing (KR-8100PA, Topcon, Japan), visual acuity testing at 5 m using a Landolt ring chart, intraocular pressure (NT-530P, NIDEK, Japan) and axial length measurements (OA-1000, TOMEY, Japan), and fundus examination by a glaucoma specialist. Those with corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better, intraocular pressure of 21 mmHg or less, normal optic disc, and no fundus disease were included.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Preoperative Assessment for Cataract Surgery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients had a standard full preoperative assessment, which included biometry; keratometry and anterior segment and fundus examination with slit lamp microscopy; optical biometry (OA2000 optical biometer; Tomey Corporation, Nagoya, Japan); ultrasound biometry (Axis Nano; Quantel Medical, Rockwall, TX, USA); B-scan (UD-800 system; Tomey Corporation); visual quality analyzer (KR1W; Topcon, Tokyo, Japan); optical coherence tomography (OCT) (Cirrus HD OCT model 5000; Carl Zeiss Meditec; Inc., Jana, Germany); anterior segment OCT (CASIA SS-1000; Tomey Corporation); specular microscopy (ROBO-CA; Konan Medical Inc., Hyogo, Japan); non-contact tonometry (NT-530P; Nidek Co., Ltd., Gamagori, Japan); autorefraction (KR-8100PA; Topcon, Tokyo, Japan); and manual refraction. Cataracts were subdivided into nuclear opalescence grades I–V, based on the Lens Opacity Classification System III (LOCS III) criteria.13 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Refractive Error Correction Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Twenty-four male subjects from Air Force Medical University were recruited; their ages ranged from 20 to 35 (mean 27.75 ± 4.33) years. The inclusion criteria for selecting participants were as follows: spherical degree (D) − 2.00 D ~ + 2.50 D, cylindrical degree − 1.00 D ~ + 1.00 D, and best-corrected VA ≥ 1.0 (decimal vision). The exclusion criteria were a history of refractive surgery, central nervous system disease, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, and other organic ocular diseases. The experiments were conducted in the same laboratory under the same luminance environment, and all subjects rested and adapted to the light environment for 10 min before the examination. An automated, computerized refractive examiner (KR-8100PA, Topcon, Japan) was used to detect the subjects’ refractive condition. First, the refractive error of the subjects was examined. After meeting the criteria, twenty-four subjects were randomly divided into four groups: 1.0/1.0, 0.8/0.8, 0.6/0.6, and 0.4/0.4 (decimal vision). Six subjects and twelve eyes were in each group. Second, subjects were checked for monocular VA at 5 m using a standard logarithmic visual acuity E chart with 96% contrast in a 200 cd/m2 luminance lightbox. Finally, the subjects were corrected to the corresponding VA using the subjective insertion method with appropriate lenses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!