The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using cd8 apc h7 clone sk1

1

Liver Cell Phagocytosis Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liver cells were freshly isolated from liver tissue as described above. Two million liver cells were pelleted by centrifugation and resuspended in 100 uL of pHrodo E. coli bioparticles (Life Technologies, P35361) prepared at 1 mg/mL in PBS + 2% FBS. Cells were incubated with E. coli bioparticles for 2 hours at 37°C, 5% CO2. A negative control was conducted using 10 uM cytochalasin D. Cells were washed once with PBS + 2% FBS and then stained with CD3-Pacific Blue clone SP34-2 (BD Biosciences), CD4-BV650 clone OKT4 (Biolegend), CD8-APC-H7 clone SK1 (BD Biosciences), CD45-APC clone MB4-6D6 (Miltenyi), CD14-BV785 clone M5E2 (Biolegend), CD68-FITC clone Y1/B2A (eBioscience), and Live/Dead Aqua Fixable Dead Stain (Life Technologies) for 20 minutes at room temperature. After a wash in PBS + 2% FBS, cells were resuspended in PBS + 2% FBS and acquired on a BD LSRII flow cytometer with phagocytosed E. coli bioparticles detected on the PE filter. Data were analyzed using FlowJo software (version 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Leukocyte Sorting and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Intrahepatic and peripheral leukocytes were sorted using the FACS Aria II (BD, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, United States) equipped with a 130 μm nozzle. Blood and liver samples were immunophenotyped and various leukocyte populations were subsequently sorted for gene expression analysis by RNA sequencing, using the gating strategy depicted in Fig. 1A and B. We selected CD235a‐negative, CD45‐positive cells (nonerythrocyte, all leukocytes) cells, followed by further gating on forward scatter (FSC) and sideward scatter (SSC), positivity for CD56 or CD3 (Fig. 1), and exclusion of dead cells (5–10% in the liver biopsies) and doublets (using FSC‐W/SSC‐W and FSC‐H/SSC‐H). This sorting strategy resulted in T and NK cells with purities of at least 95%. The following populations were purified (Fig. 1C): CD45+CD3+ (T cells) and CD45+CD56+ (total NK cells) using CD3:PeCy7 (clone UCHT1, eBioscience, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States), CD8:APC‐H7 (clone SK1, BD Biosciences), Live/Dead:AmCyan (Miltenyi Biotec), CD45:PE‐eFluor610 (eBioscience, HI30), and CD235a:FITC (clone HIR2, eBioscience).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Evaluating T Cell Responses to DLBCL Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PBMCs from healthy human donors were obtained from Miltenyi Biotec, and naive CD4+ cells were negatively selected using the naive CD4+ T cell isolation kit II by MACS according to the manufacturer’s instructions. CD4+ cells were activated using anti-CD3 (clone OKT3, 5 μg/mL) and anti-CD28 (clone CD28.2, 10 μg/mL) mAb–precoated 96-well plates. Next, 2 × 105 T cells and 4 × 103 DLBCL cells (SU-DHL-4 or Karpas-422) were cocultured at a 50:1 ratio in AIM-V medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with HLA-DR/DP/DQ mAb (clone WR18, 10 μg/mL) for MHC II blockade for 3 days. T cell proliferation was assessed using CellTrace violet dye (Invitrogen). Prior to coculturing, CD4+ cells (1 × 107 cells/mL) were stained with 5 μM CellTrace violet dye and incubated at 37°C for 15 minutes with gentle vortexing every 5 minutes. Flow cytometry was performed on the FACSSymphony flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) using the following Abs/stains: LIVE/DEAD Yellow Fixable dye 1:1000 (Invitrogen), CD4 BV786 clone SK3 1:200 (BD Biosciences), CD8 APC-H7 clone SK1 1:200 (BD Biosciences), and CD69 FITC clone FN50 1:50 (BioLegend).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry for Cell Phenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell surface staining for flow cytometry was performed using the following antibodies: CD45-BUV395 (clone HI30, BD), CD3-AF700 (clone UCHT1, BD), CD4-APC-H7 (clone RPA-T4, BD), CD8-APC-H7 (clone SK1, BD), TIGIT-PE/Dazzle™ 594 (clone A15153G, Biolegend), TIGIT-BV421 (clone A15153G, Biolegend), and PD1-BV421 (clone EH12.2H7, Biolegend). These antibodies were used to analyze surface receptors in two different panels. Isotype-matched antibodies, labeled with the proper fluorochromes, were used as negative controls. Extracellular staining was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, an antibody cocktail was added to whole blood or BM samples, which were then incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes in the dark, followed by red cell lysis with lysis buffer (BD; Cat: 555899). The lysed cells were washed twice with phosphate buffer saline (PBS), and then 350 μl stain buffer was added for further flow cytometer analysis. Twenty microliters of absolute count microsphere (Thermo; Cat: C36950) were added to the samples for absolute number analysis. Cells were analyzed using a BD Fortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences), and data analysis performed with Flowjo 10.6 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Flow cytometry cell surface staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell surface staining for flow cytometry was performed using the following antibodies: CD3-AF700 (clone UCHT1, BD), CD4-APC-H7 (clone RPA-T4, BD), CD8-APC-H7 (clone SK1, BD) and PD-1-BV421 (clone EH12.2H7, Biolegend). Isotype-matched antibodies, labeled with the proper fluorochromes, were used as negative controls. Cells were analyzed using a BD Fortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences), and data analysis was performed with Flowjo 10.6 software as previously described (22 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Profiling HCV-specific T-cell Cytokine Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cytokine production profile of HCV-specific T-cell lines was determined by intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) after restimulation with NS3-peptides. For T-cell epitope mapping 0.2×106 expanded cells were either restimulated with NS3-peptide-pool (1 µg/ml/peptide) or without NS3-peptide, in medium containing co-stimulatory αCD28 and αCD49d molecules (2 µg each, BD-Biosciences) and 5% FCS (MP-Biomedicals). After 2 hrs, Brefeldin A (Golgiplug 1∶1000, BD-Biosciences) was added and 16 hours later the surface markers were stained with a panel of fluorochrome labeled antibodies, containing CD3-PacificBlue (clone SP-34-2, (BD-Pharmingen), CD14-PE-TexasRed (clone RMO52, BeckmanCoulter), CD20-PE-TexasRed (clone B9E9, BeckmanCoulter), CD4-PE-Cy7 (clone SK3, BD-Pharmingen) and CD8-APC-H7 (clone SK1, BD-Pharmingen). Stained cells were fixed and permeabilized (Cytofix/Cytoperm, BD Biosciences), followed by staining of accumulated intracellular cytokines with IFNγ-APC (clone B27, BD Pharmingen), IL-2-PE (clone MQ1-17H12, BD Pharmingen) and TNFα-FITC (clone MAb11, BD Pharmingen). Cell staining was analyzed on a FACSAria (BD Bioscience) and DIVA software Version 6.1.1.
To evaluate antigen sensitivity, T-cell lines were restimulated with increasing concentrations of individual peptide ranging from 0.05 to 10 µg/ml before intracellular cytokine production was measured.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

MAIT Cell Identification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies were used: CD161-BV605 (HP-3G10, BioLegend), CD11c-BV650 (clone B-ly6, BD Biosciences), CD107a-BV711 (clone H4A3, BioLegend), CD4-BV786 (clone SK3, BD Biosciences), Vα7.2-AF-647 (clone 3C10, BioLegend), HLA-DR-AF-700 (clone L243, BioLegend), CD8-APC-H7 (clone SK1, BD Biosciences), IFNγ-V450 (clone B27, BD Biosciences), CD40-PerCp-Cy5.5 (clone 53C, BioLegend), CD3-ECD (clone UCHT1, Beckman Coulter), and PD1-BV711 (Clone EH12.2H7, BioLegend). Aqua fluorescent dye (Invitrogen) was used as a viability dye.
Following stimulation, cells were stained for viability with the Aqua fluorescent dye and incubated for 10 min at room temperature. After viability staining, surface staining was performed with CD161, Vα7.2, CD4, and CD40. Cells were then fixed and permeabilized with Cytofix/Cytoperm buffer (BD Biosciences) followed by intracellular staining with CD3, CD8, CD14, CD11c, HLA-DR, and IFNγ. The stained samples were acquired on a BD LSR Fortessa FACSDiva Software. A total of 500,000 events were collected and results analyzed using FlowJo (version 9.9.6, FlowJo LLC). We defined MAIT cells as CD3+CD161+Vα7.2+ T cells, after excluding doublets and dead cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive T-cell Suppression Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the suppression assay, the following antibodies were used: CD3 (Pacific Blue, clone UCHT1, BioLegend), CD8 (PE, clone RPA-T8,BDPharmingen) and CD69 (APC, clone FN50, BioLegend). The percent infection was assessed by quantifying GFP expression using the following formula:
[1(%GFP+CD4+TcellsculturedwithCD8+Tcells)/(%GFP+CD4+Tcellswithouteffectors)x100%].
The following markers were used to assess cell death, immune activation, and exhaustion: CD3 (PE, clone UCHT1, BD Pharmingen), CD8 (APC-H7, clone SK1, BD Biosciences), CD69 (APC, clone FN50, BioLegend), 7AAD (Read in PerCP/Cy5.5, BD Pharmingen), Annexin V (Read in V450, BD Biosciences) and PD1 (PerCP/Cy5.5, clone EH12.2H7, BioLegend)CD25 (FITC, clone M-A251, BD Pharmingen), HLA-DR (PE, clone L243, Biolegend) and Ki67 (APC, clone Ki67, Biolegend). Proliferation was assessed using the CellTrace cell proliferation kit from Invitrogen, and read in the FITC channel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Flow Cytometry Analysis of 5T4 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine 5T4 expression on tumor cells, 1×105 cells were labeled in 100 μL fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) buffer [1% FCS in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)] containing EpCAM (PE, clone 9C4; Biolegend) and 5T4 (clone H8 or 2E4) antibodies for 30 minutes at 4°C. To determine transduction efficiency for 5T4 CAR, 1×105 cells were stained with biotin-SP AffiniPure goat anti-mouse IgG F(ab′) 2 fragment-specific antibody (Jackson Immuno Research Laboratories, PA) in human AB serum buffer (PBS containing 1% human AB serum) for 30 minutes at 4°C. Cells were then washed and stained with CD3 (APC, clone UCHT1, Biolegend), CD4 (BV785, clone OKT4, Biolegend), CD8 (APC-H7, clone SK1, BD Biosciences, UK), and Streptavidin (PE, BD Biosciences) diluted in FACS buffer for 30 minutes. Samples were washed and then fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS. Analysis was performed on the LSR Fortessa (BD Biosciences). Data were analyzed using FlowJo v. 7.6.2 software (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!