The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

18 protocols using xevo tq xs mass spectrometer

1

Quantification of Serum 25OHD Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Both total and free 25OHD were quantified from collected mouse sera. Free 25OHD analysis was performed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Diasource, cat no: KAPF1991). This assay has 77% cross-reactivity with 25D2. Total serum 25OHD was analysed using Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) as described previously, with slight modifications [20 (link), 21 ]. In brief, samples were prepared for analysis by protein precipitation and supported liquid-liquid extraction (SLE). Samples were derivatized with 4-(2-(6,7-dimethoxy-4-methyl-3-oxo-3,4-dihydroquinoxalinyl)ethyl)-1,2,4-triazoline-3,5-dione (DMEQ-TAD) as previously described [22 (link)]. Analysis of serum was performed on a Waters ACQUITY ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) coupled to a Waters Xevo TQ-XS mass spectrometer. The LC-MS/MS method has been validated on US Food and Drug Administration guidelines for analysis of these metabolites as previously described (32).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Placental Vitamin D Metabolite Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
13C-25(OH)D3, 13C-24,25(OH)2D3, and 13C-1,25(OH)2D3 were quantified in samples using ultraperformance liquid chromatography hyphenated with electrospray ionization – tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) (Assar et al., 2017 (link)). Analysis of extracted, placental vitamin D metabolites was performed on a Waters ACQUITY ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) coupled to a Waters Xevo TQ-XS mass spectrometer (Li et al., 2019 (link)). 1,25(OH)2D3 in placental perfusate samples was measured using the 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D EIA kit (Immunodiagnostic Systems, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Nucleotide Analysis via UPLC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC separation of nucleotides (cAMP, AMP, ATP, cGMP, GMP, GDP, and GTP) was performed with a UPLC I-Class FTN system (Waters) equipped with an Atlantis Premier BEH C18 AX column (2.1 mm x 50 mm, 1.7μm, Waters). Separation was performed at a flow rate of 400 μl/min with the following LC gradient: 0–1 min: 3% B, 1–4 min: 3–20% B, 4–5 min: 20–85% B, and 5–5.5 min: 85% B; solvent A, 0.2% (v/v) formic acid in water; solvent B, 0.2% (v/v) formic acid in acetonitrile. The UPLC system was directly coupled to a Xevo TQ-XS mass spectrometer (Waters) with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source. Multiple-reaction monitoring (MRM) was performed using specific transitions for the nucleotides cAMP, AMP, ATP, cGMP, GMP, GDP, and GTP.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantification of Tranexamic Acid in Plasma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasma concentrations of TXA were determined by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. 4-Aminocyclohexanecarboxylic acid was used as the internal standard41 (link),42 with modifications. Specifically, plasma samples were prepared for analysis using protein precipitation with acetonitrile. Sample extracts were analyzed using normal phase chromatography with a Waters BEH HILIC column (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.7 μm, Waters Corp.) followed by detection with a Waters Xevo TQ-XS mass spectrometer. The mobile phase was A (10 mmol/L ammonium formate in water/isopropanol/formic acid 50/50/0.1):B (10 mmol/L ammonium format in acetonitrile/water/formic acid 90/10/0.1) = 40:60 with 0.25 mL/min flow rate. The mass spectrometer used an electrospray ionization source and a positive ion multiple reaction monitoring mode. For quantification of TXA, mass-to-charge ratios were set to 158.2 > 95.2 for TXA and 144.2 > 109.1 for the internal standard, respectively. Measurements for samples containing over 25 μg/mL TXA were obtained after diluting the samples into control plasma. The lower limit for TXA quantification was 0.04 μg/mL. Intra-assay (within-day) precision (% coefficient of variation [% CV]) and accuracy (% bias) were 1.3% to 8.7% and 0.9% to 7.6%, respectively. Inter-assay (between-day) % CV and % bias were 0.7% to 6.7% and 1.2% to 15.2%, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

UPLC-MS/MS Quantification of Toxins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC®) instrument coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) was used to identify and quantify the toxin levels of AMs. The UPLC system included an ACQUITY UPLC column oven, an AQUITY UPLC I-class autosampler, and an ACQUITY UPLC I-class binary pump. The separation was created through a Purospher® STAR RP-18 endcapped (2 µm) Hibar® HR 50-2.1 UPLC column (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). A 0.5 µm OPTS-SOLV® EXP™ precolumn (Sigma-Aldrich, Hamburg, Germany) was used to ensure the safety of the column. The entire system was coupled to a Xevo® TQ-XS mass spectrometer (Waters GmbH, Eschborn, Germany). The software MassLynx (Version 4.2, Waters, Eschborn, Germany) was used to collect and analyze the data. Detection limits were defined to be threefold the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N), which were also directly calculated in TargetLynx XS [17 (link)]. Table 7 lists the implemented chromatography and mass spectrometry parameters for the UPLC-MS/MS measurements. Figure 7 shows the conceptual model of the analytical approach used to detect potential new AMs and a flow chart of the applied MS/MS modes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of Pamiparib and Isotope Labeled Internal Standard by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Waters Xevo TQ-XS mass spectrometer was operated in electrospray positive ionization mode using multiple reaction monitoring mode. The capillary voltage was set at 3.00 kV, and desolvation temperature was set at 500°C. Gas flow parameters were optimized to 1000 L/h for desolvation, 150 L/h for cone, and 7.0 bar for nebulizer. The dwell time was set at 50 ms. Cone voltage and collision energy were optimized at 60 V and 38 eV for pamiparib, and 70 V and 42 eV for [13C2,15N2]pamiparib. The most sensitive MS transitions of m/z 299.0 → 133.0 and 303.0 → 134.9 were selected for monitoring pamiparib and [13C2, 15N2]pamiparib, respectively (Figure 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Analysis of Vitamin D Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liquid-chromatography tandem mass-spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used to quantify the following vitamin D metabolites in serum and SF; 25(OH)D3, 3-Epi-25(OH)D3, 25(OH)D2, 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (24,25(OH)2D3) and 1,25(OH)2D3 as described previously [32 (link)–34 ] with slight modifications. In brief, samples were prepared for analysis by protein precipitation and supported liquid-liquid extraction, followed by derivatization with 4-(2-(6,7-dimethoxy-4-methyl-3-oxo-3,4-dihydroquinoxalinyl)ethyl)-1,2,4-triazoline-3,5-dione (DMEQ-TAD) as previously described [35 (link)]. Analysis of extracted sera and SF vitamin D metabolites was performed on a Waters ACQUITY ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) coupled to a Waters Xevo TQ-XS mass spectrometer. The LC-MS/MS method has been validated on US Food and Drug Administration guidelines for analysis of these metabolites.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Targeted Metabolomic Analysis of Breast Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Metabolite extraction and targeted metabolomics analysis were performed as described previously.20 Briefly, all samples from 51 patients were divided randomly into one analytical batch. Each sample was weighed precisely and homogenized in cold 80% methanol solution (50 mg tissue/mL), then vortexed, and centrifuged at 4°C at 15,000 g for 15 min. The supernatant was collected and dried under a high‐speed vacuum concentrator. The dried metabolite particles were re‐dissolved in formic acid in analytical grade water, mixed, and then centrifuged to remove fragments. Next, the supernatant was measured for targeted metabolite profiling using a liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) approach. Chromatographic separation was performed using An Acquity UPLC I‐Class system (Waters Corp.), coupled with a Xevo TQ‐XS mass spectrometer (Waters Corp.). We collected and classified the metabolites based on the Human Metabolome Database (HMDB) (http://hmdb.ca). Raw data preprocessing and normalization were performed as described previously.20, 27 The further analyses of metabolic differences between IMPC and IDC, including principal component analysis (PCA) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis, were performed using the “prcomp” and “clusterProfiler” functions in the R package, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Analysis of Gut Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data from three independent experiments or more are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). ANOVA test and log rank were used for statistical analysis of differences between groups, and p (*) < 0.05, p (**) < 0.01, and p (***) < 0.001 are considered statistically significant. Stools from 3-week-old chickens fed with vehicle and 250 ppm BP for 4 weeks were collected. Their aqueous extracts (40 μL) were incubated with 13C6-3NPH·HCl to conjugate short-chain metabolites in the supernatants as published [34 (link)]. The reaction mixtures were analyzed using the Acquity UPLC chromatography coupled to a Xevo TQ-XS mass spectrometer (Waters, Millford, MA, USA) with an ESI source in negative mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Serum Estrogen Quantification by UPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Serum from animal samples were also used to determinate the content of estrogen by UPLC-MS/MS system. The quantitative analysis was performed on a UPLC-MS/MS system consisting of ACQUITYTM UPLC System (Waters Corp., Milford, USA) coupled to a Xevo TQ-XS mass spectrometer (Waters Corp., Milford, USA). The sample preparation method, derivatization and determination were consistent with that reported in the literature [31 (link),32 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!