The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using critical point dryer

1

Ultrastructural Analysis of Mouse Kidneys

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mouse kidneys were perfused with 10% formalin in 9 mmol/l sodium cacodylate, 0.05% picric acid, and 135 mmol/l sucrose, and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and 2.5% glutaraldehyde in PBS on ice for 2 h. For scanning electron microscopy, the samples were treated with 2% OsO4 in PBS for 2 h, dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol (from 60% to 100%) at room temperature, and soaked into 3-methylbutylacetate to be dried completely in Critical Point Dryer (Hitachi). The dried specimens were mounted on brass stages and coated with ionized gold particles (20 nm) in Ion Corter IB-3 (Eiko Engineering). The samples were observed in a JSM-7505FA electron microscope (JOEL Ltd) at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV. For transmission electron microscopy, the samples were washed with PBS, treated with 2% OsO4 in PBS on ice for 2 h, dehydrated in graded ethanol, and embedded in epoxy resin. Ultrathin sections were stained with uranyl acetate for 2 h and lead nitrate for 3 min. The samples were observed with a Hitachi H-7500 electron microscope (Hitachi High-Tech).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Scanning Electron Microscopy of T. b. brucei

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
T. b. brucei GUTat 3.1 treated with supplements in vitro were fixed in 3.5 % glutaraldehyde placed in a fridge at 4 °C for overnight fixation. The next day, it was washed with PBS. Small droplets containing parasites were put on poly-lysine coated slides. Samples on slide glass were then stained in 1 % osmium tetraoxide (OsO4) and dehydrated in a series of graded ethanol concentrations for 10 min each. They were dried in a critical point dryer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) using liquid carbon dioxide. The samples were then sputter coated with platinum in an ion sputter coater (Hitachi). Digital images were collected using a scanning electron microscope (S-4500, Hitachi) operating at 10 kV at 500 to 40,000 times magnification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Shock-Treated Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Shock-wave-treated cells were immediately fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde plus 2% paraformaldehyde for 2 h and then post-fixed in 1% osmium-tetroxide solution for 1 h. After dehydration in an ascending ethanol series, cells were dried with liquid CO2 with a critical point dryer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) and sputtered with platinum-palladium (Pt-Pd). The morphology of the shock-wave-treated cells was compared with the control under a LEM1200EX scanning electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

SEM Tissue Preparation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging, the tissue sections were collected onto the cover slips (32 × 24 mm). The sections were then de-waxed twice in xylene for 10 min, then three times in 100% ethanol for 10 min each followed by two immersions in acetone for 10 min. Each slide was then critical point dried in liquid CO2 in a critical point dryer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) and ion coated (IB-2, Eiko, Tokyo, Japan) before documentation in the SEM (Inspect S, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Scanning Electron Microscopy of hFOB 1.19 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
hFOB 1.19 cells were seeded at 5×104 cells/ml on surface of disc samples, and incubated for 3 days at 33.5°C in serum-containing media. Discs incubated without cells were as negative controls. Cells growing on glass coverslips were used as controls for cell growth. Samples were washed carefully with PBS and fixed overnight in 4% glutaraldehyde buffered in PBS at 4°C. After washing thrice in PBS, the samples were dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol solutions (10%- 100%) for 10 min each, followed by drying in a Critical Point Dryer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Samples were mounted on stubs and sputtered with gold using an Ion Coater (Eiko, Tokyo, Japan), and then visualized using a SEM at 15 kV to 20 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Biofilm Assay with Myrtenol Treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The biofilm assay was performed on 24-well plates including glass slides incubated with or without myrtenol at 37°C for 24 h. Then, the glass slides were washed with sterile PBS and immediately air-dried.
For the light microscopy analysis, the slides were stained with 0.4% CVS and subsequently observed at a magnification of 400× using a Nikon Eclipse Ti-S microscope (Tokyo, Japan).
For the confocal laser scanning microscopy analysis,11 (link) bacterial cells from the biofilm and pellicle were fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer for 16 h and 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M phosphate for 1 h. The samples were washed with 0.05 M cacodylate buffer and dehydrated in a series of ethanol washes (50%, 75%, 90%, 95%, and 100% for 20 min each) before being dried with a critical point dryer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The dried specimens were coated with platinum/palladium and were observed(25nm) using a Hitachi E-1030 ion sputter. The prepared specimens were observed under a Hitachi S-4300 scanning electron microscopy (SEM) operating at 15 kV. CompStat 2 was used to calculate the BP-AB biofilm’s biomass, thickness, and surface-to-volume ratio grown with or without myrtenol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Observing Antimicrobial Effects on Biofilms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM was used to observe biofilm formation and effects of antimicrobial drugs on biofilm formation12 (link). In order to observe the morphological changes associated with biofilms following moxifloxacin treatment, biofilms were allowed to grow on sterile flat-bottom 6-well polystyrene tissue culture plates (LabServ, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) in the presence or absence of moxifloxacin treatment. Fresh Cation-Adjusted Mueller Hinton Broth (CAMHB) without any antibiotic was used as a control. The samples were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde for at least 4 h at 4 °C. After washing with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), the samples were dehydrated in a series of ethanol solutions of increasing concentration (50 to 100%). The cells were subsequently washed with pure acetone, followed by isoamyl acetate. They were then dried with a critical point dryer (Hitachi, Japan). The dried samples were coated with 15-nm gold using an argon automatic sputter coater (Hitachi, Japan). After processing, the samples were viewed with a Philips XL30CP scanning electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Ethanol Stress Response in Yeast

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
W. anomalus cells were cultured with a YEPD medium at 28 °C for 8 h. Different concentrations of ethanol (3%, 6%, 9%, and 12%, v/v) were added, and the cells were cultured for 6 h to implement ethanol stress. Cells cultured without ethanol (0% Ethanol) were used as the control for this experiment and other experiments in this study. Yeast cells were centrifuged at 4, 000 × g for 10 min and washed three times with physiological saline. Then, the cells were re-suspended in 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 4 h at 4 °C and washed three times with 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.4). Subsequently, the cells were eluted with a gradient concentration of ethanol solutions (0%, 50%, 70%, 85%, 95%, and 100%) for 15 min each. Yeast cells were dried with a critical point dryer (Hitachi, Japan), coated with a gold/palladium alloy, and observed with an FEI Quanta FEG 450 scanning electron microscopy system (FEI, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Rat Bone Marrow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To observe microstructure, the bone marrow tissues were taken by the aforementioned method from each group of rats (n=10) on days 0 and 7. The tissues were first fixed with 4% glutaraldehyde (Shanghai Yuanye Biotechnology Co. Ltd, Shanghai, China) for more than 4 h, then were washed three times with the PBS, post-fixed with 1% potassium phosphate-buffered osmium tetroxide (pH = 7.0, provided by Electron Microscope Testing Lab, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China) for 1 h, and washed three times with PBS. Then, the tissues were dehydrated using a graded series of ethanol (30, 50, 70, 80, 90, 95, and 100%) for 15–20 min at each step, transferred to the mixture of alcohol and isoamyl acetate (provided by Electron Microscope Testing Lab, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China) for approximately 30 min, and then transferred to pure isoamyl acetate for approximately 1 h. Finally, the tissues were dehydrated in a critical point dryer (Hitachi, Japan) with liquid CO2. The dehydrated tissues were coated with gold-palladium (provided by Electron Microscope Testing Lab, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China) and observed under a scanning electron microscope (SEM; Hitachi, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Corneal Ultrastructural Analysis by SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fresh corneas were first fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde for 24 h, and then in 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution in 0.2 M cacodylate buffer and 1% tannic acid at pH 7.0–7.3 for another 24 h, followed by postfixation with 1% osmium tetroxide solution in 0.2 M cacodylate buffer solution for 1 h. Samples were then dehydrated by a critical point dryer (Hitachi Ltd., Japan) and coated with platinum in an ion sputter coater (Hitachi Ltd., Japan). Finally, the samples were observed and photographed with the scanning electron microscope (Hitachi Ltd., Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!