The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using rabbit anti vegf

1

In situ Proximity Ligation Assay for Protein-Protein Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For detection of protein-protein interactions, in situ PLA was performed. The components used (Sigma) were as follows: anti-mouse PLA plus probe, anti-rabbit PLA minus probe and Detection Reagents Orange. HUVEC or U87MG cells were grown on μ-Chamber 12 well on glass slides (Ibidi©, Martinsried, Germany). After reaching 80% confluence or after appropriate treatment of cells, the assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, after fixation and blocking, cells were incubated with the primary antibodies: mouse anti-VEGF (1:250), rabbit anti-VEGF (1:250), rabbit anti-Flk-1 (1:250), mouse anti-Flk-1 (1:250), mouse anti-NCL (1:50), goat anti-RPTPβ/ζ (1:250) (all from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.), mouse anti-ανβ3 (1:500; Merck Millipore), mouse anti-PTN (1:500; Abnova, Heidelberg, Germany) and mouse anti-RPTPβ/ζ (1:250; BD Biosciences). Subsequently, cells were incubated with secondary antibodies conjugated with oligonucleotides. After hybridization and ligation of the oligonucleotides, the DNA was amplified. A detection mixture detected the amplicons, resulting in red fluorescence signals. Nuclei were counterstained with Draq5; cells were mounted with Mowiol 4–88 and visualized at room temperature with Leica SP5 confocal microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunostaining of Cellular Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunostaining was performed as previously described in detail (Jumabay et al., 2012 (link)). Briefly, cells grown in chamber slides were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100, blocked with 10% goat serum and 1% BSA in PBS, and incubated over night at 4°C with the appropriate primary antibodies or non-specific IgG control antibodies, diluted 1:200 in 1% BSA in PBS. The next day, cells were incubated with secondary AF-488-conjugated (green fluorescence) or AF-594-conjugated (red fluorescence) goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes). The cells were washed with PBS, the nuclei stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Sigma-Aldrich), and visualized by fluorescence microscopy. The non-specific IgG control antibodies showed no staining and are not included in the figures.
We used the following antibodies for immunostaining: hamster anti-CD31, rabbit anti-vone Willebrand Factor (vWF) (both from Dako), goat anti-BMP4, goat anti-MGP, rabbit anti-VEGF, rabbit anti-VE-Cadherin (all from Santa Cruz Biotechnology), mouse anti-Perilipin (Cell Signaling Technology).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein samples for western blot analysis were prepared as described previously [22] (link). Briefly, MSCs (passages 3–5) were washed three times with ice-cold PBS and then treated with lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, containing 2% SDS (Sigma-Aldrich) and a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Samples were centrifuged for 1 h at 18,000× g at 4°C. The supernatants were collected as whole cell lysates. Protein concentrations were estimated using a DC protein assay (Bio-Rad) with a bovine serum albumin standard. Equal amounts of proteins (10 µg) were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on 4–20% acrylamide gradient gels (Bio-Rad) and then transferred onto a polyvinylidene fluoride microporous membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA). The membranes were blocked with a blocking reagent (Toyobo, Tokyo, Japan) and then incubated with each primary antibody. The primary antibodies used were: rabbit anti-PCAF, rabbit anti-HIF-1α (Cell Signaling Technology), rabbit anti-VEGF (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and rabbit anti-β-actin (Cell Signaling Technology). After washing, the membranes were incubated with a peroxidase-labeled secondary antibody (Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan) and visualized using Immunostar LD (Wako). Images were captured digitally using a ChemiDoc XRS+ (Bio-Rad) and analyzed by Image Lab 2.0.1 software (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Uterine Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The contralateral side of the uterus (n = 6 per group) was homogenised in RIPA lysis solution (Solarbio) containing 1 mM PMSF. The concentration of the extract was determined by centrifuging it at 12,000 rpm for 5 min and then analysing the supernatant using a BCA protein assay kit. Electrophoretically, a 4–20% polyacrylamide gradient gel was used to separate the 30 g of extracted protein. Milk at 5% in TBST was used to inhibit nonspecific binding for 1 h. Primary antibodies were used to detect the following proteins: rabbit anti-Alix, rabbit anti-CD63, mouse anti-GAPDH, rabbit anti-VEGF (1:1000; Santa Cruz), mouse anti-LIF, rabbit anti--Tubulin (1:1000; Antibody Revolution), and mouse antiintegrin-3. After that, the membranes were treated with a fluorescently labelled IRDye 800 secondary antibody (1:3000; Rockland) of the matching species for 2 h at room temperature in the dark. The LICOR Odyssey (Lincoln, NE) was used to take digital pictures of the protein bands. ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to measure the grey value of the protein band to determine the relative expression. The levels of -Tubulin were utilised as a reference. At least three separate trials were conducted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Neurological Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary antibodies were used as follows: goat anti-DCX (1 : 100; Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA), mouse anti-MAP2 (1 : 100; Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), rabbit anti-Iba1 (1 : 2000; Wako, Richmond, VA, USA), mouse anti-6E10 (1 : 1000, Covance, San Diego, CA, USA), mouse anti-phospho tau (1 : 1000, Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA), goat anti-tau (C17) (1 : 1000, Santa Cruz), rat anti-neprilysin (1 : 500, R&D Systems, Inc.), mouse anti PSA-NCAM (1 : 2000, Millipore), rabbit anti-VEGF (1 : 1000, Santa Cruz), mouse anti-PSD-95 (1 : 2000, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), rabbit anti-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; 1 : 10000, Ab Frontier, Seoul, South Korea).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Silencing Epas1 Gene Regulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PCR primers and experimental conditions are summarized in Table S4. Two different siRNA sequences that silenced Epas1 effectively were used in this study (Table S5). Nonsilencing, scrambled siRNA was used as a negative control. Cells were transfected for 6 h with siRNA using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen), and then infected with Ad-Epas1 or treated with IL1β. In qRT-PCR, the relative levels of target mRNA were normalized to those of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase. The following antibodies were used for Western blotting: rabbit anti-MMP2, -3, -9, -12, -13, and -14 (Epitomics); rabbit anti-ADAMTS4 (Abcam); goat anti-IL6 (R&D Systems); rabbit anti-ADAMTS5 (Thermo Scientific); rabbit anti-iNOS, rabbit anti-VEGF, goat anti-RANKL, and goat anti-TNFα (Santa Cruz); and mouse anti-COX2 (Cayman Chemical).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Integrin αVβ3 and VEGF Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To examine the expression of integrin αVβ3, VEGF and its receptor pFlk-1 in the cortex and hippocampus, western blot assay was performed as described in a previous study (Jiang et al., 2013). Samples from treated mice were resolved using sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gradient gels (20 mg protein per lane). Proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The membranes were blocked in 5% non-fat milk and then incubated with polyclonal mouse anti-integrin αv (1 μg/mL), mouse anti-integrin β3 (1 μg/mL), rabbit anti-VEGF (1 μg/mL) or rabbit anti-pFlk-1 (1 μg/mL) (all from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) overnight at 4°C. After three washes with Tris-buffered saline containing Tween-20, the membranes were incubated with anti-mouse-horseradish peroxidase (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or goat anti-rabbit-horseradish peroxidase (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 30 minutes at room temperature. The experiment was performed in triplicate, and β-actin was used as an internal control. The optical density values were calculated with Quantity One image analysis software (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blot Analysis of VEGF and Smad3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer containing protease inhibitors (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate and 10 μg/ml aprotinin). Protein concentration was determined by Bio-Rad DC Protein Assay kit (Hercules, CA, USA). From each sample, 30 μg of protein was separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Protein levels were assessed by immunoblotting with the following antibodies: rabbit anti-VEGF (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), rabbit anti-phospho-Smad3 (Cell Signaling, Boston, MA, USA) and mouse anti-β-actin (Sigma). After incubation with appropriate primary and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies, the specific protein bands on the membranes were visualized by using enhanced chemiluminescence reagents (Pierce, Davenport, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunofluorescence Staining of Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) pH 7.4 for 10 min and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton in PBS for 15 min. After being washed 3 times with PBS, the cells were blocked with PBS containing 3% BSA and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were stained with the following primary antibodies: rabbit anti-VEGF (1:250; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.), mouse anti-RPTPβ/ζ (1:250; BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA), mouse anti-ανβ3 (1:500; Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany), and rabbit anti-NCL (1:1,000, Sigma). Cells were then incubated with fluorescent Alexa secondary antibodies (1:500; Molecular Probes, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Nuclei were stained with Draq5 (Biostatus Limited, Leicestershire, UK). Cells were mounted with Mowiol 4–88 (Merck Millipore) and visualized at room temperature with Leica SP5 (X63 objective with a numerical aperture of 1.4) confocal microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Western Blot Analysis of Angiogenic Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Treated cells were lysed in ice-cold RIPA buffer (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) containing ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics). Equal amounts of samples (30 µg of protein) were separated on a NuPAGE 4-12% bis-tris gel (Invitrogen) and then transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. After blocking, membranes were incubated with primary antibodies, including rabbit anti-MMP2 (1:1,000, Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), mouse anti-MMP9 (1:1,000, Santa Cruz Biotechnologies), rabbit anti-TIMP1 (1:2,000, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), mouse anti-TIMP2 (1:2,000, Abcam), rabbit anti-VEGF (1:1,000, Santa Cruz Biotechnologies), rabbit anti-CD31 (1:1,000, Abcam), and mouse anti-β-actin (1:1000, Abcam). After washing, the membrane was incubated with secondary antibody, and bands were visualized using ECL methods (Amersham, Arlington Height, IL, USA). Protein bands were detected using LAS-1000 (Fujifilm Medical Systems USA, Stamford, CT, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!