The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

39 protocols using anti flag m2 f3165

1

Antibody Detection of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse monoclonal antibodies to GRP94 (MAB7606; R&D Systems), GLUT1 (ab40084; Abcam), the α-subunit of the FoF1ATPase (612516; BD Biosciences), and the DDK epitope tag (F3165 anti-FLAG M2; Sigma-Aldrich) were obtained from commercial sources. Goat polyclonal antibodies for LG3BP and clusterin were obtained from R&D Systems (AF2226 and AF2937, respectively). Expression of GRP94 in cells was analyzed by protein immunoblotting as described previously using the α-subunit of the F0F1-ATP synthase as the loading control (Cherepanova et al., 2014 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Yeast Protein Antibodies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rabbit polyclonal antibodies to Ost1p (Silberstein et al., 1995b ), Wbp1p (te Heesen et al., 1992 (link)), Swp1p (te Heesen et al., 1993 (link)), CPY (Silberstein et al., 1995a (link)), and Sec63p (Feldheim et al., 1992 (link)) were characterized previously. A goat polyclonal antibody to SHBG (R&D Systems, VFJ01), a mouse monoclonal anti-HA antibody (Roche, 11867423001), and the mouse monoclonal anti-DDK antibody (Sigma, F3165 anti-FLAG M2) were from commercial sources. A mouse monoclonal antibody to S. cerevisiae RPL3 (ScRPL3) was obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank at the University of Iowa.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunoblotting: Antibody Detection Methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-NKG2D N20 (sc-9621) polyclonal antibody was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, goat polyclonal antisera specific for CatC (AF1071) from R&D Systems and mouse monoclonal antisera for β-tubulin (ab101019) from Abcam. Anti-STT3B and anti-STT3A antibodies were described previously (Kelleher et al. 2003) (link). For recognition of epitope tags anti-DDK (F3165 anti-FLAG M2, Sigma) was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of CD59 and DAF in HAP1 cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HAP1 cells were a gift from T.R. Brummelkamp (Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Carette et al., 2011 (link)). They were cultured in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium containing 10% FCS with antibiotics needed for selection. HEK293 and its derivative HEK293FF6 cells (Hirata et al., 2015 (link)) were cultured in DMEM containing 10% FCS.
Mouse monoclonal anti-CD59 (clone 5H8; Maeda et al., 2007 (link)), anti-DAF (clone IA10; Maeda et al., 2007 (link)), anti-Flag (F3165; M2; Sigma-Aldrich), anti-GFP (HT801-01; TransGen Biotech), anti-HA (H3663; HA-7; Sigma-Aldrich), anti-ERp57 (K0135-3; MBL), rabbit monoclonal antisyntaxin 6 (2869S; Cell Signaling Technology), anticalreticulin (12238S; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-myc (AM933; Beyotime), and polyclonal anticalnexin (C4731; Sigma-Aldrich) were used as primary antibodies. Phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated goat anti–mouse IgG (12-4010-87; Thermo Fisher Scientific), HRP-conjugated anti–mouse IgG (HS211-01; TransGen Biotech), and anti–rabbit IgG (HS101-01; TransGen Biotech) were used as the secondary antibodies. DNJ (Cayman Chemical), DMJ (Cayman Chemical), KIF (Cayman Chemical), TG (Sigma-Aldrich), dithiothreitol (Sinopharm), and TM (Sigma-Aldrich) were used for drug treatments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of GPI-Anchored Proteins in HEK293 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293 (ATCC CRL-1573) cells and their derivative cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) at 37 °C with 5% CO2. PGAP1-KO69 (link) and PGAP2-KO70 (link) cells have been constructed previously. KO cell lines used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table 1. Mouse monoclonal anti-CD55 (clone IA10)50 (link), anti-CD59 (clone 5H8)50 (link), anti-CD230 (14-9230-82; Thermo Fisher Scientific), anti-CD109 (556039; BD Biosciences), anti-GAPDH (60004-1-Ig, clone 1E6D9; Proteintech), anti-FLAG (F3165; M2; Sigma-Aldrich) and rabbit monoclonal anti-HA (3724S; Cell Signaling Technology) were used as primary antibodies. F(ab’)2-goat anti-mouse IgG, PE (12-4010-82; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and F(ab’)2-donkey anti-rabbit IgG, PE (12-4739-81; Thermo Fisher Scientific), and Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, HRP (HS201-1; TransGen Biotech) were used as the secondary antibodies. For flow cytometric analysis, antibodies were used at 10 µg/ml. For western blotting, the primary antibodies and the secondary antibodies were used at 1 and 0.2 µg/ml, respectively. PI-PLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and proaerolysin (produced and purified in the laboratory) were used for treatments. Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8, MedChemExpress) was used to detect cell viability.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Detailed Antibody Generation and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The custom-made antibodies used in this study were generated in rabbits against either selected regions or full-length proteins, as described previously (Wang et al. 1996 (link); Yang et al. 2009a (link); Sabath et al. 2013 (link)). Antibodies against Drosophila Lsm10 and Lsm11 (Liu et al. 2006 (link); Nizami et al. 2010 (link)) were kindly provided by Joe Gall (Carnegie Institution for Science). Anti-Flag M2 (F3165) and anti-SmB (S0698) mouse monoclonal antibodies were from Sigma.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Centrosome Protein Antibody Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The rabbit polyclonal antibody against RTTN was raised using recombinant RTTN-His (residues 1347–1591) and subjected to affinity purification. The following antibodies were used in this studies: antibodies against SAS-6 (residues 1–489, 1:500 dilution)13 (link), CPAP (residues 1070–1338, 1:1000 dilution)50 (link), CEP120 (residues 639–986, 1:1000 dilution)15 (link), CEP135 (residues 650–1140, 1:1000 dilution)9 (link), CEP295 (residues 2092–2430, 1:500 dilution)19 (link), centrobin (residues 443–626, 1:1000 dilution)13 (link), and centrin 2 (residues 1–173, 1:1000 dilution)13 (link). The other commercially available antibodies used in this study included anti-STIL (A302–442; 1:200 dilution), anti-hPOC5 (A303–341; 1:500 dilution) and anti-SPICE (A303–272; 1:500 dilution) (all from Bethyl); anti-hSAS-6 (H00163786; 1:100 dilution, monoclonal Ab), anti-centrin3 (H00001070-M01; 1:1000 dilution) and anti-CEP162 (PAB22408; 1:1000 dilution) (all from Abnova); anti-CP110 (12780-1-1p; 1:500 dilution; Proteintech); anti-CEP164 (NBP1-81445; 1:500 dilution; Novus Biologicals); anti-POC1B (PA5-24495; 1:500 dilution; Thermo Fisher); anti-acetylated tubulin (T6793; 1:1000 dilution) and anti-Flag (M2; F3165; 1:3000 dilution) (both from Sigma-Aldrich); and anti-GFP (632381; 1:3000 dilution; BD Bioscience).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunoprecipitation of C16orf74-PPP3CA Complex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transfected cells were harvested with RIPA buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.1% SDS, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, and 1X protease inhibitor cocktail set III (Calbiochem)) 2 days after transfection. Immunoprecipitation was performed with mouse anti-Myc (9E10, Santa Cruz) antibody or anti-Flag-M2 (F3165, SIGMA) antibody. The antibodies were removed by incubation with protein G Sepharose (Zymed/Invitrogen), and the wash step was repeated 5 times. Proteins were extracted with SDS sample buffer and separated by 10-20% gradient SDS-page (Bio-Rad). To examine the interaction of Flag-C16orf74 with Myc-PPP3CA, we analyzed the immune complexes by western blotting with rabbit anti-Flag and anti-Myc antibodies. To examine the interaction of endogenous C16orf74 with endogenous PPP3CA, Capan-1 cells were harvested in RIPA buffer, and immunoprecipitation was performed with mouse anti-PPP3CA (sc-17808, Santa Cruz) antibody or rabbit anti-C16orf74 (immunized with full-length recombinant C16orf74 protein) antibodies. Then, we collected the antibodies with protein G Sepharose (Zymed/Invitrogen) and repeated the wash steps 5 times. Proteins were extracted with SDS sample buffer and separated by 10-20% gradient SDS-page (Bio-Rad). We analyzed the immune complexes by Western blotting with mouse anti-PPP3CA (sc-17808, Santa Cruz) antibody, or rabbit anti-C16orf74 antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antibody-based Protein Analysis Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following commercial antibodies were used: HRP-conjugated anti-mouse I gG (NA931), and anti-rabbit IgG (NA941) from GE Healthcare (Pittsburgh, PA), HRP-conjugated anti-rat IgG (AP136P), and anti-ubiquitin Lys63 specific (05–1313) from EMD Millipore (Billerica, MA), anti-TAK1 (sc-7162), anti-IKKα/β.(sc-7607), anti-IκBα.(sc-371), anti-JNK (sc-7345), anti-p38 (sc-728), anti-Tab1 (sc-6052), anti-β-actin (sc-69879), and anti-ubiquitin (sc-8017) from Santa Cruz (Dallas, Texas), anti-p-TAK1 (4531), anti-p-IKKα/β.(2078), anti-p-IκBα.(9246),.anti-p-JNK (9251), and anti-p-p38 (9211) from Cell Signaling (Beverly, MA), anti-HA (11867423001) from Roche (Indianapolis, IN), and anti-Flag (M2, F3165) from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). LPS, TNF, IL-1β,.5Z-7-oxozeaenol, dithiothreitol (DTT), iodoacetamide (IAA), and formic acid were obtained from Sigma. Acetonitrile (ACN) and ammonium bicarbonate were obtained from Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI). Sequencing-grade trypsin was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Protein Extraction and Immunoblotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein lysates from whole tissues were prepared by homogenising in ten volumes of urea lysis buffer, as described [1 (link)]. Samples were quantified using a BCA assay (Thermo Scientific, VIC, Australia), separated on polyacrylamide gels (Bio-Rad, Gladesville, NSW, Australia) and immunoblotted. Clarity Western ECL substrate was used for visualisation (Bio-Rad, Gladesville, NSW, Australia). Antibodies used were as follows: anti-RLF, Ab115011 and anti-RCOR1, Ab32631 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK); anti-LSD1, 2139 and anti-HP1α, 2616 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA); anti-Flag M2, F3165 and anti-γ-tubulin, T5192 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA); anti-MRE11 (12D7) GTX70212, anti-NBS1 (1C3) GTX70222 and anti-RAD50 (13B3) GTX70228 (GeneTex, Irvine, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!