The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

346 protocols using jmp version 10

1

Lung Cancer Survival Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The primary outcomes in this study were lung cancer-specific mortality and risk of death. Survival time was calculated as the time from primary surgery to death due to lung cancer, censoring at the date of last contact or non-cancer death. Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test was used to examine distributions of variables. Differences in survival were examined using log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate the relative risk for death and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Statistical analyses were performed using a statistical software JMP version 10.0.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA), otherwise specified. Extended Fisher's exact test was conducted using “R”: a language and environment for statistical computing (R Core Team, 2013. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/) with a package “coin”. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was examined to compare the observed and expected genotype frequencies using a Chi-square test. Statistical significance of reporter experiments and gene expression analyses were analyzed using statistical softwares JMP version 10.0.2 and StatView version 5.0 software (SAS Institute Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multivariate Analysis of Substance Use

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were analyzed using JMP Version 10 (SAS Institute) using its embedded standard general linear model algorithms [23 ]. All data were analyzed using JMP Version 10 (SAS Institute) using its embedded standard general linear model algorithms [23 ]. T tests (T test) were used for comparisons between two groups with respect to continuous variables. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for comparisons of groups with continuous variables and estimate the amount of variance explained by the predictor. Bivariate regression (bivariate) was used for analyses of the relationship between two continuous variables. Cotinine and carbon monoxide (CO) levels, depending on context, could be treated as either a categorical or a continuous variable. Cotinine levels of 2 ng/μl or greater were classified as categorical positives. Carbon monoxide levels of 10 parts per million (ppm) were treated as categorical positives. Self-report of substance use by subject or parent was treated as a categorical variable. Methylation and PHQ-9 scores were used as continuous variables.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Microbiota Analysis via Monte-Carlo Test

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For microbiota data, the statistical difference between treatments was examined using the Monte-Carlo test in package ade4 [27 ,28 ] of R 2.14.0 [29 ] as described by de Carcer et al [30 (link)]. The Monte Carlo test is a non-parametric test based on random permutations. The statistical differences of the between treatments was evaluated with the function of ade4::randtest.between. The values of zero were replaced with the detection limit, which is determined by the ratio of one to the lowest read number in the data set. The Benjamini-Hochberg procedure was applied to control the false discovery rate. The dominant genera that increased or decreased in abundance were identified by correspondence analysis in package ade4 of R 2.14.0 as described by de Carcer et al [30 (link)]. Statistical difference for relative gene expression was assessed with the Wilcoxon rank sum test (Mann–Whitney test) using JMP version 10 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) and was presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical difference was determined at a P value of 0.05 or less. Bacterial genera detected in cecum content of mice administered saline (control) or L. casei strains and fold change in the expression of the targeted genes in the ileum of mice administered L. casei were used to generate a dendrograms by the Ward method of hierarchical clustering (JMP version 10, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive CE-TOFMS Metabolite Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raw data obtained by CE–TOFMS were processed with MasterHands [48 (link)]. Signal peaks corresponding to isotopomers, adduct ions, and other product ions of known metabolites were excluded, and all signal peaks potentially corresponding to authentic compounds were extracted, and then their migration time (MT) was normalized using those of the internal standards. Thereafter, the alignment of peaks was performed according to the m/z values and normalized MT values. Finally, peak areas were normalized against those of the internal standards, methionine sulfone and cyclosporin A for cations and anions, respectively. Annotation tables were produced from the CE–ESI–TOFMS measurements of standard compounds, and were aligned with the datasets according to similar m/z values and normalized MT values. The compounds that had statistically invalid area deviations by ANOVA (F value < 2, n = 13, 2) were excluded from further analysis. Principal component analysis (PCA) and correlation analyses were conducted using JMP version 10.0.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Trends in Venous Thromboembolism Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Categorical variables are presented as numbers and percentages, and continuous variables are presented as the mean and SD for normally distributed continuous variables or the median and interquartile range for nonnormally distributed continuous variables. We evaluated patient characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes. In‐hospital all‐cause death was calculated by dividing the number of deaths by the number of hospitalizations. In addition, we evaluated changes of proportions of PE and DVT, treatment strategies, and outcomes over time. Changes of categorical variables were evaluated using the Cochran‐Armitage test for trend,18 and changes of continuous variables were evaluated using the Jonckheere‐Terpstra test for trend.19 All statistical analyses were conducted using JMP version 10.0.2 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC) or EZR (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan), which is a graphical user interface for R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). All statistical analyses were 2‐tailed, and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Covariate-Adjusted Analysis of MCI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differences in numeric variables were assessed using analysis of variance. Frequency differences were assessed with χ2 tests. Covariate adjustment was performed by linear regression analysis. Covariate-adjusted odds ratios for the presence of MCI were evaluated with logistic regression analysis. All statistical analyses were performed with commercially available statistical software (JMP version 10.0.2; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA), and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data are presented as medians and interquartile ranges. The statistical significance of differences was assessed by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Categorical variables were compared by Fisher’s exact test. All analyses were carried out using the JMP version 10.0.2 software program (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). A value of p<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Demographic Factors and Crime Profiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using JMP® version 10.0.2 (SAS Institute). The background characteristics of each group and psychotropic drug use were compared using the chi‐square test, and the odds ratios were calculated. To compare the different items of each category, the standard groups were the 20‐29 group and theft group; theft was the most common crime in Japan.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cardiac Function Analysis in Transgenic Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All results are expressed as means ± SE. For analysis of a parameter (e.g., +dP/dt) as functions of group (WT, Tg26) and Iso, two-way ANOVA was used to determine statistical significance. For analysis of BAG3 abundance, myocyte contraction amplitudes, myocyte shortening and relengthening velocities, and echocardiographic indices, one-way ANOVA was used. A commercial software package (JMP version 10.0.2, SAS Institute; Cary, NC, USA) was used. In all analyses, p < 0.05 was taken to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Student's t-test Statistical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
JMP version 10.0.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used for statistical analyses. Differences were analyzed using Student’s t-test and were considered statistically significant at P<0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!