The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

24 protocols using stadiometer

1

Standardized Anthropometric Measurements in Children

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Children's weight and height were measured in duplicate by a trained experimenter. Children were weighed to the nearest 0.1 kg using a digital scale (PHARO 200, Soehnle, Benfeld, Germany) without shoes. Their length was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a stadiometer (TANITA Leicester, Birmingham, UK). Weight and height were transformed into BMI z-scores (BMIz) corrected for age and sex according to the WHO child growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents (36 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Anthropometric Measurements in Children

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each consenting child was measured without shoes or heavy outer garments by trained data collectors, in line with the Body Image Guidelines developed and endorsed by the OPAL Scientific Advisory Committee. Data collectors were trained in body image, cultural sensitivities, mandatory reporting and anthropometry; one data collector on the team was required to be a registered teacher. Height (Invicta Stadiometer) and weight (Tanita BWB-800 portable electronic scales) measures were taken by the same data collector on one occasion and final measures determined as the mean of two measures, or the median if three measures were taken (in the case that the first two measures differed by more than 0.5 cm or 0.5 kg, for height and weight respectively). Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height (m) squared and converted to age- and sex-specific z-scores using the UK 1990 reference data [32 (link)]. Children were categorised as underweight (BMI z score < − 1 to <− 3), normal weight (0), overweight (> 1.0 - < 2.0) or obese (> 2.0) using the International Obesity Taskforce (IOTF) cut-points [33 (link), 34 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Cardiometabolic Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood pressure was measured with an Omron sphygmomanometer twice in the right arm, with the subject seated and the arm supported. The mean of the two readings was used for analysis. With subjects in light clothing and without shoes, height was measured with a Harpenden stadiometer to the last complete 0.1 cm, and weight with a Tanita MA-418-BC body composition analyser (Tanita, Tokyo, Japan). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight/(height)2 (kg/m2). Grip strength (in kilograms) was measured using a Jamar Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer, with three measurements taken with each hand and the best of six used for the analysis. A walking test measured the time taken, in seconds, to walk 3 m at normal walking pace. A five-repetition sit-to-stand test was performed: participants were asked to move from a seated to a standing position five times in succession, avoiding the aid of hands and the time taken, in seconds, to perform this was recorded. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was measured using a Vitalograph Compact II instrument with subjects standing, without nose clips. FEV1 was standardised to the average study height, 1.71 m, using the formula: standardised FEV1=FEV1 × (1.71/height)2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Anthropometric Measurements Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Body height and body mass were measured using a stadiometer (SECA, Leicester, UK) and an electronic scale (HD-351, Tanita, Illinois, USA), respectively. Percent of body fat was calculated from the sum of 10 skinfolds using a skinfold caliper (Harpenden, West Sussex, UK). Calculations were based on the formula proposed by Parizkova (1978) . Three trials were given for each anthropometric measurement in rotational order, and the average value was recorded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Anthropometric Measures and Weight Loss

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants' height (in centimetre) and weight (in kilogram) were measured by research staff using a wall‐mounted Harpenden stadiometer and a Tanita® digital scale, respectively, at pre‐treatment to determine BMI. Participant weight was also measured at post‐treatment. Percent weight loss was calculated such that more positive values indicate greater weight loss. At pre‐treatment, participants completed a sociodemographic questionnaire that assessed age, race and ethnicity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Anthropometric Measurements for Obesity Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Research nurses measured participants’ body weight using Tanita electronic scales, participants were measured without shoes and in light clothing, and height was measured using a Stadiometer with the Frankfort plane in the horizontal position. BMI was calculated using the standard formulae [weight (kilograms)/height (meters) squared]. Research nurses recorded waist circumference twice mid-way between the iliac crest and lower rib using measuring tape. An average of the first two measurements was used provided these differed by no more than 3 cm; otherwise a third reading was taken and the two closest results utilised. Central obesity was defined as >102 cm in men and >88 cm in women [23 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Biometrics Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Height was measured to the nearest 0.1cm using a Harpenden Stadiometer and weight to the nearest 0.1 kg using a Tanita TBF 305 scales. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing weight (in kilograms) by height (in meters squared). Total fat and lean body mass were determined by a DEXA scanner (Lunar Prodigy DXA scanner; GE Medical Systems, Madison, WI, USA). Non-fasted blood was drawn and biochemistry analysis of glucose and cholesterol was undertaken following locally established procedures. A maturity offset was calculated based on the Mirwald equation26 (link) to assess maturation. Socioeconomic status (SES) was assigned based on paternal occupation in eight classes (1, higher managerial and professional through to 8, never worked and long-term unemployed)27 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cardiometabolic Health and Inflammation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cardiometabolic health was defined by both systolic blood pressure and body mass index (BMI). At 17, resting blood pressure was measured using a DINAMAP 9301 machine and was taken twice on each arm. In these analyses, we used the average of two measures for right arm systolic blood pressure, though if only one measure was taken, that was used. Body mass index (BMI) was derived from height and weight measurements as kg/m2. Height and weight were measured using a Harpenden stadiometer (to the last complete mm) and the Tanita Body Fat Analyzer (Model TBF 401A; to the nearest 50 g), respectively.
Finally, body inflammation was assessed by C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. At 17, CRP was measured in mg/l from a blood assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Anthropometric Measurements Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All measurements were made by highly trained and experienced technician. Height and body mass were measured using a stadiometer (SECA, Leicester, UK) and an electronic scale (HD-351, Tanita, Illinois, USA). Skinfolds were measured using John Bull calipers. Circumferences were measured with flexible standard measuring tape and diameters were measured using sliding Vernier outside calipers (GPMc). In addition to weight and height, the following parameters were also measured: four diameters (elbow, wrist, knee and ankle); five circumferences (upper arm, both relaxed and flexed, forearm, the calf and the thigh) as well as seven skin folds (biceps, triceps, forearm, thigh, calf, subscapular and supra-iliac).
Anthropometric parameters were analyzed by a special software program that utilizes all Mateigka’s formulas intended for calculations of all body components (16 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Anthropometric Measurements in Longitudinal Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At 9 and 17 year clinics height was measured using a Harpenden Stadiometer and weight was measured to the nearest 50 g using a Tanita Body Fat analyser (model TBF 305). Whole-body DXA scans, using a Prodigy scanner were carried out to derive total fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!