The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using clone ep49

1

Immunohistochemistry for MMR Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IHC was carried out in cores from 2 μm thick TMA sections with the following antibodies and conditions: MLH1, clone ES05 (Monosan, Uden, Netherlands) at 1:80 dilution; MSH2, clone 25D12 (Novocastra/Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) at 1:40 dilution; MSH6, clone EP49 (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) at 1:60 dilution; and, PMS2, clone M0R4G (Novocastra/Leica Microsystems) at 1:50 dilution. All tests were performed using a Bond Max autostainer (Leica Microsystems) with diaminobenzidine as chromogen for protein-antibody complex visualization. Stains were evaluated by two pathologists (G.R. and E.V.) for all tumour and normal cores, along with external controls for assessing method performance. Each core was evaluated for nuclear staining intensity and distribution of positive cells at 200X and 400X magnification. Cases were considered as pMMR (proficient MMR) if any degree of nuclear expression was observed for all four proteins in the neoplastic cells and dMMR if no IHC nuclear expression was seen for any of the four proteins.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of MMR Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis for MMR proteins (MLH1, MSH6, MSH2, and PMS2) was performed to determine the tumor MMR status. In the current cohort, MMR status was analyzed only when MMR status was required for clinical practice and/or the patient provided consent for analyzing the MMR status. Accordingly, 76 of 910 (8.4%) tumors were investigated for MMR status. The resected specimens were fixed in 10% formalin, dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin. Paraffin sections (3‐µm thick) were used for IHC. The sections were pretreated with epitope retrieval solution 2 (Leica Biosystems, Newcastle, UK) for 40 min at 95°C and then reacted with antibodies specific for MLH1 (Clone ES05; Dako, Santa Clara, CA; dilution 1:50), MSH2 (Clone FE11; Dako; dilution 1:50), MSH6 (Clone EP49; Dako; dilution 1:50), and PMS2 (Clone EP51; Dako; dilution 1:25). After reaction with diaminobenzidine chromogen using EnVision + system‐ HRP Labelled Polymer Anti‐mouse (Dako), the slides were evaluated by pathologists. If the tumor showed the absence of tumor cells in at least 1 MMR protein, but retained expression in adjacent normal tissue as positive controls, the case was considered MMR‐deficient (MMR‐D).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tumor Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples were sliced in consecutive 3.0-μm-thick sections, which were dewaxed in xylene and rehydrated in graded ethanol. Immunohistochemical staining was then performed as per the Dako REAL EnVision Detection System (K5007, Dako) manual. The following primary antibodies were used:
Anti-LATS1/2 (1:100; ab111344, Abcam), Anti-CD163 (1:100, ab87099, Abcam), Anti-CD8 (1:100, ab4055, Abcam), Anti-FOXP3 (1:100, ab20034, Abcam), Anti-MLH1 (1:50, clone ES05, DAKO), Anti-PMS2 (1:40, clone EP51, DAKO), Anti-MSH2 (1:50, clone FE11, DAKO), and Anti-MSH6 (1:50, clone EP49, DAKO).
Paraffin-embedded sections (3.0 μm) were prepared for immunohistochemical analyses. After deparaffinization, all antigens except nestin were retrieved at 120°C for 15 min in a sodium citrate buffer solution (pH 6.0). Tissues were incubated with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide for 30 min and then blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (Sangon, Shanghai, China) overnight at 4°C. The peroxidase reaction was developed using a 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB) chromogen solution in a DAB buffer substrate and then counterstained with hematoxylin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating PD-L1 and MMR Status in Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PD-L1 status was estimated by IHC staining of FFPE tissue sections using anti-PD-L1 antibodies clone 22C3 (DAKO, cat#m3666) or 28–8 (Abcam, Cat#ab205921) [29 (link), 44 (link)]. The specimen was considered PD-L1 positive expression when the combined positive score (CPS) was either ≥ 1 [45 (link)–47 (link)]. IHC analysis was conducted to detect MMR-related proteins, including MLH1 (clone ES05, cat#IR079, DAKO), PMS2 (clone EP51, cat#IR087, DAKO), MSH2 (clone FE11, cat#IR08561-2, DAKO), and MSH6 (clone EP49, cat#IR086, DAKO). Tumors were classified as dMMR when the expression of at least one MMR protein was lost and as MMR-proficient when all four MMR proteins had positive nuclear staining in tumor cells [48 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Immunohistochemical Profiling of Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All parental tumor tissues and PDX tissues fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin were processed routinely and embedded in paraffin wax. The sections (3 μm thick) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and histopathologically evaluated. Paraffin-embedded sections were also used for immunohistochemistry analysis, and primary antibodies against human pancytokeratin (prediluted; clone AE1/AE3, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), PAX8 (1:50; clone PAX8R1, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), estrogen receptor (ER) (prediluted; clone SP1, Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA), TP53 (prediluted; clone DO7, Dako), ARID1A (1:2000; rabbit polyclonal, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), PAX2 (1:200 dilution; clone EPR8586, Abcam), PTEN (1:200; clone D4.3, Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA), PMS2 (prediluted; clone EP51, Dako), and MSH6 (prediluted; clone EP49, Dako) were used for all cases. Primary antibodies against human CD45 (prediluted; clone M0701, Dako) were optionally used for several cases.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Determination of Microsatellite Instability in Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mismatch repair/microsatellite status of tumors was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as described previously (Hirsch et al. 2018 (link)). Briefly, IHC was performed using the following primary antibodies: MLH1 (1:25; clone ES05, cat # M3640, Dako, Agilent Pathology Solutions, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), MSH2 (ready-to-use; clone FE11, cat # IR085, Dako), MSH6 (ready-to-use; clone EP49, cat # IR086, Dako), and PMS2 (1:50; clone EP51, cat # M3647, Dako). Detection was done using the EnVision Detection System, Peroxidase/DAB, Rabbit/Mouse (cat # K5007, Dako). IHC stainings were validated by internal and/or external positive controls as well as negative control specimens. IHC stainings were evaluated by two pathologists (DH, TG). Microsatellite PCR of tumor and corresponding normal DNA was done using a panel of five mononucleotide markers (BAT25, BAT26, NR-21, NR-24, and MONO-27; cf. MSI Analysis System, Promega), and a panel of two mononucleotide (BAT25 and BAT26) and three dinucleotide markers [D5S346, D2S123, and D17S250; so-called Bethesda panel; (Boland et al. 1998 (link))]. Tumors were classified as MSI-H when two or more markers of either the Bethesda panel or the Promega panel showed an allelic size variation (i.e., a band shift compared with corresponding normal DNA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Profiling of FFPE Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor specimens with the pathological report, which included HER2 status, were retrospectively collected for IHC analysis, if residual samples were available. IHC analysis, such as for PD-L1, MMR, and chromogenic in situ hybridization for EBV-encoded RNA (EBER-ISH) using fluorescein-labeled peptide nucleic acid probes (EBV PNA Probe/Fluorescein, Agilent), were performed on FFPE tumor samples and assessed by an established pathologist.
For PD-L1 evaluation, IHC staining was performed using PD-L1 IHC 28-8 pharmDx (Dako). The level of PD-L1 protein expression was determined using the combined positive score (CPS), which was calculated as the number of PD-L1-stained cells (tumor cells, lymphocytes, and macrophages) divided by the total number of viable tumor cells and multiplied by 100. Tumor PD-L1 positivity was defined as CPS ≥ 1%.
MMR status was determined by IHC for the following proteins; anti-mutL homolog 1 (MLH1; Clone ES05, Agilent Technologies), anti-mutS homolog 2 (MSH2; Clone FE11, Agilent Technologies), anti-postmeiotic segregation increased 2 (PMS2; Clone EP51, Agilent Technologies), and anti-mutS homolog 6 (MSH6; Clone EP49, Agilent Technologies), in FFPE samples. MMR-deficient (dMMR) was defined as a tumor that lacked staining for at least one of the MMR proteins.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemical Analysis of DNA Mismatch Repair Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue sections were processed by immunohistochemistry for four MMR proteins. The primary antibodies were anti-MLH1 (1:50 dilution, clone G168-15, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) mouse monoclonal antibody, anti-MSH2 (1:100 dilution, clone FE11, Merck Millipore, ‎Burlington, MA) mouse monoclonal antibody, anti-PMS2 (1:100 dilution, clone A16-4, BD Biosciences) mouse monoclonal antibody, and anti-MSH6 (1:100 dilution, clone EP49, Agilent Technologies) rabbit monoclonal antibody. Tumors were considered negative for MLH1, MSH2, PMS2, or MSH6 when there was a complete absence of nuclear staining in the tumor cells, whereas the surrounding lymphocytes and normal epithelial cells showed consistently preserved nuclear staining. If any one of the four MMR proteins was negative, the tumor was considered to be dMMR. Tumors that preserved expression of all four proteins were considered to be MMR-proficient (pMMR). The representative immunohistochemical staining images of dMMR are shown in Supplementary Figure 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!