The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Anti mouse igg secondary antibody

Manufactured by Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Sourced in United States

Anti-mouse IgG secondary antibodies are laboratory reagents used to detect the presence of mouse primary antibodies in various immunoassays and immunochemical techniques. They bind specifically to the constant region of mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) molecules, allowing for the indirect detection and visualization of target antigens recognized by mouse primary antibodies.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using anti mouse igg secondary antibody

1

Antibody Profiling and Activation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following primary antibodies were used: antibodies against Rictor (ab70374), MMP‐2 (ab37150) and MMP‐9 (ab76003) from Abcam (Cambridge, USA); antibodies against phospho‐AKT (S473) (#9721) and phospho‐AKT (T308) (#13038) from Cell Signaling Technology; and antibodies against AKT (AF6259), phospho‐CDK2 (Thr160) (AF3237), phospho‐Histone H3.1 (Ser10) (AF3358) and β‐actin (T0022) from Affinity Biosciences. HRP‐conjugated goat anti‐rabbit IgG and anti‐mouse IgG secondary antibodies were obtained from Santa Cruz (Dallas, TX, USA). Gelatin (G7041) was purchased from Sigma‐Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). MK‐2206, 8‐[4‐(1‐aminocyclobutyl)phenyl]‐9‐phenyl‐1,2,4‐triazolo [3,4‐f] 1, 6naphthyridin‐3(2H)‐one hydrochloride [1:1], was obtained from Selleck (Shanghai, China). 3‐(4,5‐dimethyl‐2‐thiazolyl)‐2,5‐diphenyl‐2‐H‐tetrazolium bromide (MTT) was purchased from Sigma‐Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

ELISA for AbOMV-specific IgG

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ELISA based on a previously described protocol (Huang et al., 2016a (link)). AbOMV-specific IgG responses were measured using an ELISA. Briefly, 96-well plates were coated overnight with 25 μg/100 μL of AbOMVs per well. The plates were incubated with the collected serum samples (diluted 1:1000) incubated with anti-mouse IgG secondary antibodies (diluted 1:10,000, Santa Cruz) and developed with an alkaline phosphatase substrate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HHUA cells and tumors were harvested using M-PER Mammalian Protein Extraction Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with protease inhibitor (Roche, Germany) and phosphatase inhibitor (WAKO). Proteins (40 μg) were separated by 4–20% SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, followed by transfer to polyacrylamide membranes and blocking using Blocking One reagent (Nacalai Tesque) for 1 h at room temperature. Then, the membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies against RAF1, pERK, ERK, p-AKT, AKT (all from CST, Danvers, MA), c-MYC, cyclin D2, ZEB1, and α-tubulin (all from Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The primary antibodies were detected using a 1:1000 dilution of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG or anti-mouse IgG secondary antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). All membranes were visualized using ImmunoStar LD chemiluminescence reagent (WAKO). Images were captured using a charge-coupled device camera (LAS4000 mini; FujiFilm, Tokyo, Japan), and the bands were quantified using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Analysis of Zur Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
S. coelicolor cells grown to OD600 of 0.4–0.5 in YEME were sonicated in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 10% glycerol, 5 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM DTT, 10 mM MgCl2,1 mM PMSF and 0.15 M NaCl). Protein concentration in crude cell extracts was determined by Bradford reagent solution (Bio-Rad) using BSA as a standard. Either purified Zur or cell extracts containing 5 μg proteins were electrophoresed on 13% SDS–PAGE. Polyclonal mouse antibody against Zur (prepared in our lab) and the anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, SC-2005) were used at 1:5,000, 1:3,000 dilution ratio, respectively, for immunodetection (Fusion Solo; Vilber Lourmat). A representative full-sized immunoblot photo is shown in Supplementary Fig. 13. All experimental protocols that involve animals were approved by and done in accordance with the guidelines by Seoul National University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (SNUIACUC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunoblotting of Metabolic Regulators

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies against UCP1 (uncoupling protein 1; 1:1000; #14670), Sirt1 (sirtuin-1; 1:1000; #3931), PPAR-γ (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma; 1:1000; #2435), PGC-1α (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1 alpha; 1:1000; #2178) and a secondary antibody (anti-rabbit IgG, HtL; 1:5000) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). An antibody against β-actin (1:20,000; NB600-501) and an anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (1:20,000; sc-2005) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TE, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

SREBP Protein Isolation and Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To isolate proteins, cells were lysed with RIPA buffer (Sigma, cat no. R0278), supplemented with PMSF and protease inhibitors (Roche, cat no. 11836153001). Protein concentration was estimated using the BCA assay (Thermo Scientific). Protein was separated using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (4–15%) and transferred to a PVDF membrane (Bio‐Rad Inc.). The membrane was blocked in 5% milk and incubated with anti‐SREBP antibody (1:250; Santa Cruz, cat no. sc‐365513) overnight at 4 degrees followed by anti‐mouse IgG secondary antibody (cat no. A11008) in TBS‐T for 1 hr. The signal was observed using SuperSignal West Dura Extended Duration substrate (Thermo Scientific) and images captured on the Bio‐Rad ChemiDoc imager and analyzed using Fiji (Schindelin et al., 2012).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!