The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Brainamp system

Manufactured by Brain Products
Sourced in Germany

The BrainAmp system is a scalable and modular data acquisition system designed for high-quality recording of bioelectrical signals. It offers a range of amplifier modules, each with different channel counts and input types, to accommodate various research and clinical applications. The system provides reliable and precise data capture, supporting a wide range of sampling rates and input resolutions.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

29 protocols using brainamp system

1

EEG Data Collection Methodology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The EEG data were collected from 96 Ag/AgCl electrodes using a BrainAmp system (BrainProducts, Gilching, Germany) and a customized, infracerebral electrode cap with an equidistant electrode layout (Easycap, Herrsching, Germany). Two of the 96 electrodes were placed below the eyes. Data were recorded with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz (analog time constant 10 s, low-pass 250 Hz), using a nose-tip reference and a midline site slightly posterior to Fz as ground. Electrode impedances were maintained below 20 kΩ before data acquisition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Infant-Mother ECG Synchronization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used a Brain-Amp system (Brain Products GmbH, Germany) with two amplifiers to measure two standard single-channel ECG registrations (lead II derivation). One electrode was placed on the upper right chest, one on the left side of the abdomen, and the grounding electrode was placed on the right side of the abdomen on both infant and mother. The ECG signal was recorded with a 500 Hz sampling frequency. Interbeat-intervals (IBIs) were then extracted offline using ARTiiFACT (Kaufmann et al., 2011 (link)). The ECG data were visually inspected for correct detections and artifacts by trained research assistants. When ectopic beats or erroneous detections were found, the data were semi-automatically corrected (removal of erroneous detection/artifact followed by a cubic spline interpolation; corrections < 1%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

EEG Recording and Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The EEG was recorded, using the BrainAmp system (Brain Products, Munich, Germany), from 64 scalp sites according to the 10–20 system positions with a reference at FCz (Herrmann et al., 2007 (link)). A common average reference was recalculated. Vertical electrooculograms were recorded using electrodes placed below the right eye. Horizontal electrooculograms were recorded from the left and right orbital rim. Electrode impedance was maintained at below 5 kΩ. Signals were amplified using a 0.01–100 Hz band pass filter and continuously sampled at 500 Hz/channel for off-line analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

EEG Recording of CI-SSD Users

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Similar to our previous study (Layer et al., 2022 ), the EEG data of the additionally measured CI-SSD users were continuously recorded by means of 64 AG/AgCl ActiCap slim electrodes using a BrainAmp system (BrainProducts, Gilching, Germany) and a customised electrode cap with an electrode layout (Easycap, Herrsching, Germany) according to the 10-10 system. To record an electrooculogram (EOG), two electrodes were placed below and beside the left eye (vertical and horizontal eye movements, respectively). The nose-tip was used as reference, and a midline electrode placed slightly anterior to Fz served as ground. Data recording was performed using a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. The online analog filter was set between 0.02 and 250 Hz. Electrode impedances were maintained below 10 k Ω during data acquisition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multimodal Neuroimaging Protocol with EEG

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anesthesia monitoring signals (PPG, ETCO2, ECG, and cuff‐based blood pressure) were also registered using 3T MRI‐compatible anesthesia monitor (GE Datex‐Ohmeda; Aestiva/5 MRI). In some cases, the ETCO2 data measured from by the anesthesia monitor were corrupted. Thus, we used scanners inbuilt PPG and respiratory bellows data for groups comparisons.
EEG was recorded with an MR‐compatible BrainAmp system (Brain Products, Gilching, Germany) with 32 Ag/AgCl electrodes (including one ECG electrode) placed according to the international 10–20 system. To get low electrode impedances (<5 kΩ), the skin potential was removed with the stick abrasion technique (Vanhatalo et al., 2003). Data sampling rate was 5 kHz and band pass from DC to 250 Hz. Signal quality was tested outside the scanner room by recording 30‐s eyes open and eyes closed. MR‐scanner optical timing pulse and BrainAmp SyncBox were used to ensure that the EEG and fMRI data were in synchrony. The amplifier was placed outside the bore, and cables were stabilized to avoid motion artifacts.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

EEG-Based Cognitive Neuroscience Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EEG was acquired during the learning phase. The ERPs were recorded from the scalp at 29 standard locations (Fp1/2, Fz, F7/8, F3/4, Fc1/2 Fc5/6, Cz, C3/4, T3/4, Cp1/2, Cp5/6, Pz, P3/4, T5/6, Po1/2, and O1/2) with a BrainAmp system (Brain Products GmbH). In addition, the vertical and horizontal eye-movements were monitored, respectively, using an electrode at the infraorbital ridge of the right eye and at the outer canthi of the eyes. The electrode impedances were maintained below 3 kOhm. The electrophysiological signals were filtered with a bandpass of 0.01–50 Hz (half-amplitude cut-offs) and digitalised at a rate of 250 Hz. The biosignals were referenced online to the electrode in the outer canthus of the right eye and re-referenced off-line to the mean of the activity at the two mastoids. Trials with base-to-peak electro-oculogram amplitude of more than 50 μV, amplifier saturation, or a baseline shift exceeding 200 μV/s were automatically rejected off-line. Stimulus-locked ERPs were averaged for epochs of 1024 ms initiated at 100 ms prior to the stimulus. The mean rejection rate in the final sample of participants analyzed was 24.6 trials ± 16.2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Scalp EEG Recording Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EEG data were recorded with 64 AG/AgCl ActiCap slim electrodes using a BrainAmp system (BrainProducts, Gilching, Germany) and a customised electrode cap with an electrode layout (Easycap, Herrsching, Germany) according to the 10–10 system. Two of the 64 electrodes were placed below (vertical eye movements) and beside (horizontal eye movements) the left eye to record an electrooculogram (EOG). All channels were recorded against a nose-tip reference, with a midline ground electrode, placed slightly anterior to Fz. Data were recorded with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz and were online analogically filtered between 0.02 and 250 Hz. Electrode impedances were kept below 10 k Ω throughout the recording.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multimodal Sleep Monitoring Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All electrophysiological data were recorded with a sampling rate of 500 Hz via the BrainVision Recorder software (Version 2.11) using a 32-channel BrainAmp system (Brain Products). We placed 11 gold-cup electrodes (Grass Technologies, Astro-Med) according to the international 10–20 system on the positions: F3, Fz, F4, C3, Cz, C4, P3, Pz, P4, O1, and O2. Linked mastoids were used for offline re-referencing as the data were online referenced against Cz. The position Fpz was used as ground electrode. Additionally, two EMG electrodes were placed on the musculus mentalis for measuring muscle activity during sleep and four EOG electrodes around the eyes to record horizontal and vertical eye movements. Impedances were always kept below 10 kΩ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Measuring Infant-Mother ECG Synchrony

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used a Brain-Amp system (Brain Products GmbH, Germany) with two amplifiers to measure two standard single-channel ECG registrations (lead II derivation). One electrode was placed on the upper right chest, one on the left side of the abdomen and the grounding electrode was placed on the right side of the abdomen on both infant and mother. The ECG signal was recorded with a 500 Hz sampling frequency. Interbeat-intervals (IBIs) were then extracted offline using ARTiiFACT (Kaufmann et al., 2011 (link)). The ECG data were visually inspected for (in)correct detections and artifacts by trained research assistants. When ectopic beats or erroneous detections were found, the data were manually corrected (removal of erroneous detection/artifact followed by a cubic spline interpolation; corrections < 1%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

EEG Data Acquisition with BrainAmp System

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The EEG signals were amplified by a BrainAmp system (Brain Products, Gilching, Germany). Its output was digitized with a resolution of 16 bit and sampled at a rate of 1000 Hz via the lab streaming layer protocol. For data acquisition, we mounted a set of 32 Ag/AgCl electrodes according to the 10/20-system and referenced it to FCz. To capture horizontal eye movements, we placed two additional electrodes on the external canthi of both eyes. We kept the impedances below 20 kΩ with the ground and the reference electrode below 5 kΩ throughout the recording.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!