The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

S3 sorter

Manufactured by Bio-Rad

The S3 sorter is a flow cytometer designed for high-speed cell sorting. It is capable of sorting cells based on their physical and fluorescent characteristics. The S3 sorter features a compact design and advanced optics to enable efficient and accurate cell separation.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using s3 sorter

1

Cell Chemotaxis Tracking and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transfected cells were sorted using a Bio-Rad S3 sorter. Polydimethylsiloxane microfluidic devices were prepared as described previously (Wu et al., 2012 (link)). Chemotaxis assays were performed on an IX81 microscope (Olympus) with a 20× objective lens using Metamorph imaging software. Images were collected every 10 min for up to 24 h. Individual cells were manually tracked using ImageJ software (Manual Tracking plugin). Only viable and visibly migrating cells (net path length >50 µm) were tracked. The tracks obtained were analyzed using the Chemotaxis Tool ImageJ plugin (http://www.ibidi.de/applications/ap_chemotaxis.html#imageanalysis). This analysis tool was used to extract the forward migration index, which is a net distance moved in the direction of the gradient divided by total path length. The plugin also generates histograms (count frequency) of migration direction of cells for each dataset. The secplot function of MATLAB was then used to generate rose plots of directional migration on normalized polar coordinates, where the outermost ring corresponds to frequency (r) of 8%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After selection of transfectant cell lines, mixed populations of epimastigotes were sorted at the CTEGD Flow Cytometry Core Facility (University of Georgia, Athens, GA) with an S3 sorter (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Green fluorescence was excited with a 488-nm laser and read through a 525/30-nm band-pass filter in log. Red fluorescence was excited with a 561-nm laser and read through a 586/25-nm laser in log. Acquisition was triggered on forward scatter (FSC), and light scatter was collected on log (log FSC versus log side scatter).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation and Analysis of Murine Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mac-STAT6, STAT6ko and WT mice were treated with IL-4c i.p. on day 0 and day 2 and sacrificed on day 4, as described before [27 (link)]. PEC cells were harvested in PBS and stained with F4/80-PE-Cy7 (BM8) and CD11b-FITC (M1/70) as described in the flow cytometry section. Macrophages were sorted as F4/80+CD11b+ on a S3 sorter (Bio-RAD, Hercules, CA). Cells were sorted into RPMI/40% FCS (v/v), pelleted, lysed in RLT/10% DTT (v/v) and stored at –80°C until RNA preparation for qRT-PCR analysis. Purity was determined after sort and only samples containing >90% F4/80+CD11b+ cells were used for gene expression analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Sequencing of B Cells from Infected Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were isolated from mes-LN and BM on day 28 or later after infection and on day 10 after transfer and B cells were purified with the MojoSort™ Mouse Pan B Cell Isolation Kit II (BioLegend). For cells after transfer Fc receptors were blocked with anti-mouse CD16/CD32 mAb and the cells stained at 4°C for 30 min for CD45.2 (Biolegend). Cells were sorted for tdTomato+ and tdTomato- before transfer and CD45.2+ tdTomato+ or CD45.2+ Tomato- cells after transfer using the S3 sorter (Bio-Rad). The cells were sorted into 1 ml FCS, pelleted and immediately lysed with RLT-buffer (RNeasy-Kit; Qiagen). The lysate was stored at -80°C until RNA isolation. RNA was isolated using the RNeasy micro kit (Qiagen). The samples were prepared for sequencing and analyzed according to the procedures described in (31 (link)).Samples were sequenced in an illumina MiSeq machine using the MiSeq Reagent Kit v3 (600-cycle).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Isolation of NEAT1 Knockout Clones

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Once we obtained the desired Cas9/gRNA constructs, we transfected cells plated in 10-cm dishes with 10 µg of downstream and 10 µg of upstream plasmid (Combination dG1/uG1 for U2OS and HCT116 and dG4/uG7 for HCT116) using a standard transient overexpression protocol with Lipofectamine 2000 reagent according to the manufacturer's instructions (Thermo Fisher Scientific, cat. no. 11668019). Forty-eight hours after transfection, we sorted the cells for GFP expression using a S3 Sorter (Bio-Rad Laboratories) and diluted the cells at 0.5 cells/100 µL into 96-well plates. After 2 wk of culture, we visually inspected the wells and selected those containing a single clone. These were collected and replated in duplicate. The cells in one of the two wells were then lysed and subjected to PCR analysis to determine their NEAT1_1 genotype with primers 5′-CGTTGGGATCTTTCTGTCT-3′ (fw) and 5′-GCTCTCCTACATGGCCTTAAT-3′ (rev). These primers were also used for Sanger sequencing to characterize the repair on each allele in homozygous NEAT1_1 KO clones. Several homozygous WT and homozygous KO clones were then selected and expanded into new cell lines from the remaining wells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Gametocyte Isolation and Microscopic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were sorted on a FACS ARIA III (BD Biosciences) using a 70 μm nozzle, into FACS tubes (Falcon) containing 1 ml 4 °C PBS (Gibco). Sulphadiazine-enriched gametocytes (Supplementary methods) were sorted using a S3 sorter (BioRad). The cells were injected IV into uninfected mice (Supplementary methods) or centrifuged at 400×g for 10 min and the cell pellet smeared onto a standard microscope slide. The slides were stained in Giemsa or May-Grünwald (0.25% (w/v) in methanol) (Sigma-Aldrich) for 5 min, washed in 1% PBS (Gibco) being washed in water. The slides were examined under a standard light microscope using a ×100 objective and immersion oil.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Isolation and Culture of Breast Cancer Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CSCs in breast cancer were defined as CD44+/CD24- cells, and NSCCs were defined as CD44-/CD24+ cells. Cells were immunostained under identical conditions as described above and CSCs and NSCCs were collected using Bio-Rad S3 sorter. Sorted NSCCs were cultured in the collection medium for 7 days before STS (or solvent control) treatment as described in the 'basic procedure for apoptosis induction and reversal of apoptosis' in Supplementary data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Sorting and Staining G1 and Gd Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The G1 and Gd cells were sorted from the WT culture (treated and stained with Sytox Green) using a Biorad S3 sorter. Sorted cells were collected and resuspended in 50mM Tris buffer (pH 7.5) and stained with 0.1mg/ml of calcofluor white for 20min at 30°C. Stained cell were washed twice with buffer before imaging. Cells subjected to glucan staining were fixed with 70% ethanol for one hour, washed with PBS buffer twice, and stained with 5mg/ml of Aniline Blue for 20min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Enrichment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Infected Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human monocyte-derived macrophages (HMDMs) were infected with Erdman smyc’::mCherry reporter Mtb strain at MOI 2:1. At 2 dpi, experimental compounds were administered at 10 µM, INH at 67.5 ng/mL, and EMB at 5 µg/mL. Infected HMDMs were treated for 48 h prior to live sorting using a Biorad S3 sorter. 40,000 mCherry positive cells were sorted into 700 µL of Trizol. To remove host RNA, Trizol samples were centrifuged and ~75% (~500 µL) of Trizol supernatant was transferred to a new tube. An additional 400 µL of Trizol and 150 µL of zirconia beads were added to the tubes containing the bacterial pellet and 25% of the remaining Trizol. These tubes were placed on a beat beater for two cycles of 1 min each, with 2 min of rest on ice in between. After the bead beating, approximately 75% of host RNA in Trizol was added to be bacterial lysate tubes. Chloroform was added to Trizol tubes (200 µL of chloroform for 1 mL of Trizol) and tubes were mixed via shaking vigorously. Trizol:chloroform tubes were centrifuged for 15 min and the aqueous phase (~1 mL) was transferred to a fresh tube. Two microliters of glycoblue and 500 uL of isopropanol were added to precipitate host and bacterial RNA. RNA was washed in 75% cold ethanol and RNA was eluted in 12 µL of NCFW.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!