The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Anti halotag antibody

Manufactured by Promega

The Anti-HaloTag antibody is a laboratory reagent used to detect the presence of the HaloTag protein in biological samples. The HaloTag is a protein tag that can be fused to target proteins, allowing for their detection and manipulation. The Anti-HaloTag antibody binds to the HaloTag and enables visualization or immunoprecipitation of the tagged proteins.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

16 protocols using anti halotag antibody

1

Aggregate Formation Monitoring in HeLa Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The FTA was performed as described previously.41 (link),42 (link) Briefly, HeLa cells stably expressing Exon1Htt103Q-HT were maintained without doxycycline for several passages to stabilize aggregate number. Cells were then plated and transfected with Lipofectamine 2000 per manufacturer’s instructions with tdTomato, tdTomato-ALFYC or tdTomato-ALFYC E3471K. 24 hours after transfection, a subset of wells transfected with tdTomato were treated with dox to inhibit Exon1Htt103Q-HT expression. All samples were collected then lysed in PBS + 1% Triton-X100 + 8M Urea 96 hours post-transfection. Lysates were immediately pelleted at 14000 rpm. Lysates were quantified using a DC protein assay kit (Bio-Rad). 120 μg and 30 μg of protein were then slotted onto a cellulose acetate membrane (20 μM) using a Biodot (Biorad) and probed with anti-Halotag antibody (Promega). 20 μg of protein was also run on the 4-12% Bis Tris gels (ThermoFisher) and probed with anti-Halotag and anti-Vinculin (ThermoFisher). Densitometry was performed on ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying SOX18 Protein Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blotting was used to assess the level of endogenous SOX18 protein in HeLa cells and HUVECs (Supplementary Figure S2A), and to compare the expression level and nuclear concentration of overexpressed HALO-SOX18 and HALO-SOX18RaOp protein in HeLa cells (Supplementary Figure S2C). Cells were seeded, and either transfected (using 1 μg of expression plasmid to 3 μl of X-tremeGENE 9) or left untransfected, and harvested for either whole cell lysates or nuclear extracts before subjecting to SDS-PAGE and Western Blotting with a human anti-SOX18 antibody (sc166025 from Santa Cruz), anti-HaloTag antibody (G9281 from Promega), or housekeeping control anti-β-actin antibody (A5441 from Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cell-Free Expression of Wheat Transcription Factor IRR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Details of wheat cell-free reaction have been described previously [39 (link)]. Cell-free protein expression was performed using the TNT SP6 Wheat Germ Master Mix Kit (Promega, Madison, WI). The primers for the irr gene are as follows: irr forward, 5΄-CCATATGATGCATTCTTCACATACCCA-3΄; irr reverse, 5΄-CTCTAGATCAGCGGGCCTGACGGCG-3΄. The polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) were incubated at 95°C for 5 min. Then 35 cycles were performed as follows: 30 s at 95°C, 40 s at 57°C, and 7 min at 72°C. The amplified PCR product was subcloned into a pDAP-Halo-Kan vector (Zoobio, Nanjing, China) using the Seamless cloning kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China), and the recombinant plasmid was used as a transcription template. The protein expression volume was 50 μL, comprising 30 μL Wheat Germ Master Mix, 1 μg pDAP-Halo-Kan-irr plasmid, and nuclease-free water to make 50 μL; this was incubated at 25°C for 2 h. The expressed protein was confirmed using western blot analysis and an anti-Halo tag antibody (Promega, Madison, WI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibody Profiling for Transcriptional Regulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies were used: anti-GR and anti-GRIP1 (BD Biosciences); anti-GR (rabbit, H300 Santa Cruz Biotechnology); anti-GR (rabbit, Novus Biological); anti-Merm1 (WBSCR22) (mouse, Abcam); anti-Merm1 (WBSCR22) (rabbit, Source Bioscience); anti-histone H3 acetyl (rabbit, Millipore); anti-histone H3 lysine 4 trimethyl (rabbit, Millipore) and anti-histone H3 lysine 79 dimethyl (rabbit, Millipore); anti-pan-methyl histone H3 (Lys-9) antibody (rabbit, Cell Signaling); anti-TFIIB (rabbit, Santa Cruz Biotechnology); horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse and anti-rabbit from GE Healthcare. Anti-Halo-tag antibody (Promega). Mouse IgG and rabbit IgG were from Millipore. Fluorophore-conjugated (Alexa Fluor 546 and 488) anti-mouse and anti-rabbit antibodies were from Invitrogen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Genomic DNA Binding Assay for OsMYB80 Transcription Factor

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DAP-seq analysis was performed according to the protocol described by Bartlett et�al. (2017) (link). Briefly, 5 μg HHZ genomic DNA was sheared into ∼200-bp fragments and then ligated with the Illumina-based sequencing adaptors to form a DNA library. The library was examined for adaptor-ligation frequency by quantitative PCR (qPCR) before applied to DAP-seq assay.
OsMYB80 ORF fused to the Halo affinity tag was expressed in vitro using TNT SP6 Coupled Wheat Germ Extract System (Promega, Fitchburg, WI, USA). The HaloTag-OsMYB80 protein was then purified from nonspecific proteins in the expression system using the magnetic HaloTag ligand (chloroalkane) beads (Promega) and verified by Western blotting with the anti-HaloTag antibody (Promega). The purified protein was incubated with 500 ng adaptor-ligated genomic DNA library at 30�C for 2 h before washing away the unbound DNA fragments.
The samples were heated at 98�C for 10 min to release the OsMYB80-bound DNA, and the recovered DNA was then PCR-amplified with the indexed TruSeq primers (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Indexed DNA samples were subsequently combined and size-selected to remove the residual adaptor dimers. Purified DNA libraries were then sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq sequencing platform.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Confocal Imaging of Lamin A Mutants in U2OS Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To prepare the cells for confocal imaging, ~60,000 U2OS cells were seeded on 12 mm glass coverslips (Thermofisher Scientific) in 24-well plates (Denville Scientific). To prepare cells for high-throughput imaging, 5,000 cells were seeded into clear bottom 96-well plates (Perkin-Elmer). Cells were transiently transfected with Halo-lamin A or the lamin A mutants 24 h after plating. After 24–48 h, cells were rinsed in PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences) for 10 min, washed in PBS, and then permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X100 (Sigma-Aldrich) for 10 min. Cells were subsequently washed in PBS and blocked in 2% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 h at room temperature. To label cells, they were incubated with a polyclonal anti-Halotag antibody (Promega) at a 1:200 dilution in 2% BSA for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were then washed 3 times for 10 min in PBS and incubated with Alexa Fluor 594 labeled donkey anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Thermofisher Scientific) at 1:400 in 2% BSA for 1 h at room temperature in the presence of 2 μg/mL DAPI. Cells underwent another round of washes in PBS before mounting on coverslips with Vectashield (Vector Labs) or high-throughput imaging. Similar staining was observed when cells were directly labeled with 3 μM JF646.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

HaloTag-LC3 Protein Expression Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Halo-LC3 stable expression cells were generated by viral transduction. The pMRX-IP-HaloTag7-LC3 was used for gene transduction. Cells were incubated in DMEM with 100 nM TMR-conjugated Halo ligand (Promega; catalog no.: G8251) for 1 h. Western blotting with an anti-HaloTag antibody (Promega; catalog no.: G9211) was performed to assess the amount of Halo-LC3 and its degradation products. pMRX-IP-HaloTag7-LC3 was a gift from Noboru Mizushima (Addgene plasmid; catalog no.: 184899; http://n2t.net/addgene:184899; Research Resource Identifer: Addgene_184899) (17 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blot Analysis of Cellular Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HepG2 or Huh7 cells were washed twice with ice‐cold PBS and ruptured with RIPA buffer containing protease inhibitor (Roche, #1697498). Cell lysates were resolved by SDS‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and then transferred onto PVDF membranes. The membranes were blocked for 1 hour with 5% non‐fat milk in TBS‐T and incubated with anti‐HaloTag antibody (Promega, #G928A), anti‐HMGA2 antibody (Active Motif, #61041), anti‐V5 antibody (Invitrogen, #1305726), anti‐nucleoporin antibody (BD Biosciences, #610498), or anti‐β‐actin antibody (Sigma, #A5441) at 4°C overnight. Membranes were washed for 20 minutes with TBS‐T, probed with appropriate HRP‐conjugated secondary antibodies, and detected with the ECL Plus chemi‐luminescence assay kit (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Halo-tagged ASPP Family CTD Pulldown

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One hundred micrograms of purified Halo or Halo-tagged ASPP family CTDs (ASPP1: 887–1090, ASPP2:925–1128) were covalently immobilized on 25 μl magnetic Halo beads slurry in pulldown buffer (50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM TCEP, 0.1% Surfactant P-20) overnight at 4 °C. The following day, myc-tagged NS5A wild-type and mutants of the indicated HCV strains or HCV core protein were produced by in vitro translation (Promega; L1170) from pcDNA3.1(+) plasmids. Reactions were incubated for 90 min at 30 °C. DNA and RNA was digested by using benzonase nuclease for 30 min at 4 °C and reactions were cleared by centrifugation for 10 min at 13 000 g to remove aggregates. Loaded beads were washed three times with pull-down buffer to remove unbound Halo proteins and incubated with 20 μl in vitro translated protein and 10 μM dissolved peptide, if indicated. Following rotation for 3 h at 4 °C, beads were washed four times with ice-cold pulldown buffer and bound proteins were eluted in 1× LDS sample buffer (Thermo Fisher) supplemented with 0.5 mM DTT for 10 min at 70 °C. Input and pulldown samples were analysed by Western blot using anti-myc tag antibody (Merck Millipore) and anti-Halo tag antibody (Promega).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Dissecting EGF Signaling Regulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-CAR (H300), anti-HSC70 and anti-PKCδ antibodies were from Santa Cruz Technology. p-CAR Thr290/Ser293 polyclonal antibody was previously described (7 (link)) and was developed by Perbioscience (Thermofisher) using the peptide Ac- RTS(pT)AR(pS)YIGSNH-C and was affinity purified before use. Anti-β-tubulin, anti- acetylated tubulin and anti-FLAG antibodies were from Sigma Aldrich. Anti-phospho-EGFR (Y1173), anti-phospho-ERK (T202/Y204), anti-EGFR and anti-ERK antibodies were from Cell Signalling. Anti-KIF22 antibody was from Genetex, anti-GAPDH was from Chemicon. Anti-GFP antibodies were from Roche (immunoblotting) and MBL (immunoprecipitation). Anti-Ki67 and anti-phospho H3 antibodies were from Leica. Anti-Halo-tag antibody and HaloTag™ direct ligand were from Promega. Anti-mouse HRP and anti-rabbit-HRP were from DAKO. Anti-mouse-568, anti-rabbit-568 and phalloidin-647 were all obtained from Invitrogen. Recombinant human EGF was acquired from Peprotech and CalyculinA, sodium orthovanadate and protease inhibitor cocktail 1 were obtained from Calbiochem. Nocodazole and Dynasore were from Sigma. KIF22 targeted siRNA were from Origene and CAR and non-targeting siRNA were acquired from Dharmacon. PKCδ targeting siRNA were from Ambion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!