The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

24 protocols using meropenem

1

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of K. pneumoniae Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out for all K. pneumoniae isolates for 12 antibiotics using standard disk diffusion test according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (CLSI) (14 ). The antibiotic disks used in the study were imipenem (10 ug), meropenem (10 ug), piperacillin (30 ug), piperacillin-tazobactam (100-10 ug), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 ug), ceftazidime (30 ug), cefepime (30 ug), ampicillin-sulbactam (10–10 ug), aztreonam (30 ug), ciprofloxacin (5 ug), gentamicin (10 ug), and tetracycline (30 ug) (MAST Group Ltd, Merseyside, UK). Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were used as quality controls strains for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antibiotic Resistance Profiling of NDM-1 Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility of the blaNDM-1 positive isolates was determined by the Kirby–Bauer method as recommended by the CLSI. The 11 standard antibiotic disks used include: imipenem (10 µg), meropenem (10 µg), ertapenem (10 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), cefepime (30 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), piperacillin/tazobactam (100/10 µg), amikacin (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg) and aztreonam (30 µg) (Mast Group Ltd, UK). The ESBL phenotype was identified using combined disk method by disks of ceftazidime (30 mg) with (10 mg) and without clavulanic acid (Mast Group Ltd, UK), applied to all blaNDM−1 positive isolates (15). Moreover, the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of imipenem (10 µg/ml) [≤ 2 mg/L (susceptible), 4 mg/L (intermediate), and ≥ 8 mg/L (resistant)] (Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy) were applied by gradient test strips to blaNDM−1 positive P. aeruginosa isolates [18 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Acinetobacter baumannii

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method against the following antibiotic discs according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines [28 ]. Microbial susceptibility test was conducted using the following antimicrobials: gentamicin (10 μg), tobramycin (10 μg), amikacin (30 μg), imipenem (10 μg), meropenem (10 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), piperacillin/tazobactam (100/10 μg), ampicillin/sulbactam (10/10 μg) and levofloxacin (5 μg) (Mast Group Ltd., Bootle Merseyside, UK). Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 19606 was used as the quality control strain in antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Pseudomonas

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DST was performed using disk diffusion method (Kirby-Bauer) on Mueller-Hinton agar (Merck, Germany) plates according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline [13 ]. The tested antibiotic disks were: imipenem (10μg), meropenem (10μg), amikacin (30μg), ciprofloxacin (5μg), ceftriaxone(30μg), ceftazidime (30μg), colistin-sulfate (10μg), pipracillin-tazobactam (100/10μg), and gentamicin (10μg) [Mast Co., UK]. P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 was used as a control strain for DST.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Combination disk diffusion test (CDDT) was performed for presumptive identification of MBLs by imipenem, meropenem, doripenem, and ertapenem (Mast Group, Merseyside, UK) alone and in combination with EDTA [9 (link)]. Detection of ESBLs was tested for all the isolates by combination disk diffusion test (CDDT) containing ceftazidime (CAZ) and cefotaxime (CTX) with CAZ 30 μg + CA 10 μg and CTX 30 μg + CA 10 μg per disc (Mast Group, Merseyside, UK). The zones of inhibition were compared for the CTX, CAZ discs with that of the CAZ 30 μg + clavulanic acid (CA) 10 μg and CTX 30 μg + CA 10 μg disc. An increase in zone diameter of ≥5 mm in the presence of clavulanic acid was interpreted positive for the presence of ESBL in the test organism. Escherichia coli ATCC25922 and K. pneumoniae ATCC700603 were used as negative and positive controls for ESBL production, respectively. Presumptive identification of KPC enzyme was performed for all the K. pneumoniae isolates by modified Hodge test [7 (link)]. Amp-C was detected using the D69C AmpC Detection kit developed by Mast Group [10 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling of K. pneumoniae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eight K. pneumoniae isolates were received from the Medical Microbiology laboratories of three hospitals in Armenia between January 2019 and August 2019. All isolates were recovered from various clinical specimens (urine, sputum, throat, blood, and stool) of hospitalized patients. The isolates were identified using a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) as described previously (59 (link)).
All isolates were tested using a disk diffusion method for susceptibility to a panel of 11 antibiotics, including ampicillin (10 mg), piperacillin-tazobactam (30/6 mg), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (20 and 10 mg, respectively), ceftazidime (10 mg), cefepime (30 mg), norfloxacin (10 mg), levofloxacin (5 mg), amikacin (30 mg), imipenem (10 mg), meropenem (10 mg), and chloramphenicol (30 mg) (Mast Group, Merseyside, United Kingdom) according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing protocol (EUCAST v.6.0, 2017) (60 ). The antibiotics chosen were those most frequently used in clinical settings in Armenia. Isolates resistant to three or more antibiotic classes were considered multidrug resistant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antibacterial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibacterial susceptibility test of isolates to cefepime (30 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), cefoxitin (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), ceftizoxime (30 µg), cefpodoxime (10 µg), imipenem (10 µg), meropenem (10 µg), ertapenem (10 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), amikacin (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), and norfloxacin (10 µg) (Mast Group Ltd., Bootle, UK) was determined by disk diffusion method on Müller–Hinton agar media (Laboratorios CONDA, Madrid, Spain) according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI).12 Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of isolates to cefotaxime, cefepime, and imipenem was determined by microbroth dilution method according to CLSI. To determine MIC of colistin and tigecycline by microbroth dilution method, we used the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing recommendations (http://www.eucast. org/clinical-breakpoints). Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were used as standard strains in antibacterial susceptibility testing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Identification of Metallo-β-Lactamases Using CDDT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Combined disk diffusion test (CDDT) was performed for identification of MBLs by imipenem and meropenem (Mast Group, Merseyside, UK) alone and in combination with EDTA. An increase in zone diameter of ≥7 mm around the imipenem+EDTA and meropenem+EDTA disks compared to that of imipenem and meropenem disks alone, respectively, was considered positive for MBL production [12 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antibiotic Susceptibility and ESBL Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic susceptibility of all the isolates was tested by employing the Kirby-Bauer’s technique as suggested by the CLSI (10 ). The eleven antibiotic disks used include: imipenem (10 μg), meropenem (10 μg), ertapenem (10 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), cefepime (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), amikacin (30 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), piperacillin/tazobactam (100/10 μg), aztreonam (30 μg) (Mast Group Ltd, UK). Isolates with resistance against a minimum of three groups of antibacterial agents were considered as MDR (11 (link)). To detect ESBL phenotype combined disk method using disks of ceftazidime (30 mg) with (10 mg) and without clavulanic acid (Mast Group Ltd, UK) was applied to all positively screened isolates by modified hodgE test (MHT) (11 (link)). A growth in the area diameter of ≥5 mm around ceftazidime disc with and without clavulanic acid was expected to be a positive result for ESBL production (12 (link), 13 (link)). The MHT was performed for all isolates as recommended by CLSI (10 ). The E test (imipenem 0.002–32μg/mL) (Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy) was applied (according to the manufacturer’s instructions) to all positively screened isolates by PCR test for blaNDM gene, to determine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling of Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The susceptibility pattern of isolates to different antibiotics were examined using disk diffusion method (Kirby-Bauer) on Muller-Hinton agar plates according to guidelines of CLSI (10 ). The antimicrobial disks were included: imipenem (10μg), meropenem (10μg), ceftazidime (30μg), carbenicillin (100μg), tobramicin (10μg), amikacin (30μg), ticarcillin (75μg), gentamicin (10μg), cefotaxime (30μg), and ceftizoxime (30μg) (MAST Co. UK). Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC27853 were used as a control strain (11 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!