The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole

1

Screening Carbapenem Resistance Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eleven carbapenem resistance genes (blaIMP, blaVIM, blaNDM, blaSPM, blaAIM, blaDIM, blaGIM, blaSIM, blaKPC, blaBIC, and blaOXA–48) (Poirel et al., 2011 (link)) were screened using PCR detection from the presumptive carbapenemase-producing bacteria. The amplicons were sequenced (Macrogen) and identified using NCBI BLAST1. For the screened carbapenemase-producing bacteria, MDR to 16 antibiotics was determined using Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion, and resistance to colistin was determined using broth dilution methods. For MDR, the following antibiotic disks were used: ampicillin-sulbactam (10/10 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg) ciprofloxacin (5 μg), colistin (2 mg/L), doripenem (10 μg), fosfomycin (200 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), levofloxacin (5 μg), meropenem (10 μg), netilmicin (10 μg), piperacillin (100 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), tobramycin (10 μg), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg) (Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy). Resistance to the antibiotics was determined according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline (Clinical Laboratory Standars and Institue, 2016 ). Subsequently, MICs of 16 antibiotics for E. coli strain N7 were evaluated using the broth dilution method (Hasselmann, 2003 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling of S. aureus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility was tested in all S. aureus isolates by disc diffusion method (Figure 1), following the European Committee of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing guidelines (2022) [28 ] or, when not possible, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (2022) [29 ]. S. aureus ATCC® 29213 was used as a quality control strain. The susceptibility to several clinically relevant antibiotics was studied, including those commonly prescribed in general dental practice, namely amoxicillin (10 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), clindamycin (2 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), quinupristin-dalfopristin (15 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (25 μg) (Liofilchem®, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy). Cefoxitin was used to predict the presence of MRSA strains [28 ,29 ]. Multidrug-resistance (MDR) was considered when the isolates were resistant to three or more antibiotics of different classes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Kirby Bauer disk diffusion method was used with Muller Hinton agar (Oxoid Ltd. Basingstoke, Hampshire, England) to determine antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of the isolates and CLSI M100 2020 was used to interpret the results [30 ].
The following antimicrobial discs were used: ampicillin (10μl), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (20/10μl), piperacillin/tazobactam (100/10μl), cefazolin (30μl), cefuroxime (30μl), ceftazidime (30μl) obtained from Hardy Diagnostics, Santa Maria, CA, USA. Ceftriaxone (30μl), cefotaxime (30μl), cefepime (30μl), imipenem (10μl), meropenem (10μl), amikacin (30μl), gentamicin (10μl), and tobramycin(10μl) were obtained from OXOID LTD., Basingstoke, Hampshire, England. Nalidixic acid(30μl), ciprofloxacin(5μl), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75μl), nitrofurantoin(300μl), and tetracycline(30μl) from Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling of Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Susceptibility of isolates to different antibiotics was evaluated according to the criteria of the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)(2016) ). Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method was used for susceptibility testing to imipenem (10 μg), meropenem (10 μg), doripenem (10 μg), levofloxacin (5 μg), minocycline (30 μg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), and tetracycline (30 μg) (Mast, Company). Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by MIC-Test Strip (Liofilchem; Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy) for four selected antibiotics, including trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, chloramphenicol, ceftazidime, and ticarcillin-clavulanate. Quality control was performed using E. coli ATCC 35218 and E. coli ATCC 25922.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!