The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

322 protocols using cell dissociation buffer

1

Cell Line Cultivation and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SW480, SW620, HT29, and HCT116 cell lines were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM/F‐12, Gibco). The HL60 cell line was cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium (RPMI 1640, Thermo Fischer Scientific). Media were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma), 2 mM Glutamax (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and penicillin 100 units/ml streptomycin 100 μg/ml (Sigma). Phase contrast images of the SW620 and SW480 cell lines grown in flasks showed a more epithelial‐like morphology for SW480's and a more fibroblast‐like morphology for SW620's as shown in Figure S2. Cells were not “synced” to allow the natural cell cycle within sample variability of the cell lines. All experiments were done with passage numbers below 50. SW480, SW620, HT29, and HCT116 were washed with Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline (DPBS) and gently retrieved from six‐well plates by incubating with cell dissociation buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 30 min, followed by centrifugation (100 Gs; 1 min) and resuspension in cell dissociation buffer. HL60 cells were retrieved from media by centrifugation (100 Gs; 1 min) and washed with DPBS once before resuspending in DPBS. When pipetted into the setup, cells sedimented onto the coverslip and showed no visible Brownian motion, remaining in a spherical shape.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Annexin V Apoptosis Assay for RAW264.7 and BAL Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RAW264.7 cells expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) or GFP-PE_PGRS30 were collected 24 h post-transfection using Cell Dissociation Buffer (Gibco, United States) and stained with annexin V-PE (559763, BD biosciences) and 7-amino-actinomycin D (AAD, BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. BAL cells treated with recombinant proteins for 24 h were collected using Cell Dissociation Buffer (Gibco) and stained with antibodies; PE-Cy7-conjugated anti-CD11c (N418, Biolegend Inc., San Diego, CA, United States), APC-conjugated anti-Siglec-F (E50-2440, BD Biosciences) and APC-Cy7-conjugated anti-CD45 (30-F11, Biolegend) antibodies for 20 min, and then stained with Annexin V-FITC (556570, BD Biosciences) and 7-AAD according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Flow cytometry data were collected using a FACSCanto II (BD Biosciences) instrument and analyzed using FlowJo (Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR, United States). Alveolar macrophages were defined as CD45-Siglec-F-and CD11c-positive cells (Misharin et al., 2013 (link)). The number of annexin V-positive cells was defined as the sum of the numbers of annexin V+/7-AAD+ cells and annexin V+/7-AAD-cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation and Polarization of Mouse Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bone marrow was flushed from mouse femurs and tibias with Ca2+ and Mg2+-free Hepes-buffered saline solution (HBSS). Pellets were stored at −80°C for protein analysis by western blot, or were frozen in liquid nitrogen in 10% DMSO/90% FCS for cell culture experiments. For in vitro differentiation of bone marrow-derived macrophages, the method was adapted from (39 (link)). Cells were plated at 2 × 106 cells per 10 cm dish in 10 ml macrophage media consisting of αMEM (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FCS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine and 10 ng/ml M-CSF (Peprotech). Functional assays were performed starting on day 7 of culture. For polarization, macrophages were removed from plates using Cell Dissociation Buffer (Gibco), washed, and plated in either M0 conditions (macrophage media), M1-polarizing conditions (macrophage media supplemented with 100 ng/ml LPS and 20 ng/ml recombinant IFNγ) or M2-polarizing conditions (macrophage media supplemented with 20 ng/ml recombinant murine IL-4) for 24 h before analysis. To measure CD206 expression on M2 polarized mouse macrophages, cells were removed from plates using Cell Dissociation Buffer (Gibco) and stained for subsequent analysis by flow cytometry as outlined below. To measure cytokine production by M1 polarized macrophages, supernatants were harvested and analyzed by multiplexed ELISA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Binding Assay for Heparan Sulfate 2-O-Sulfotransferase

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wildtype CHO-K1, pgsD-677 (Ext1−/−), and pgs-F17 cells (Hs2st−/−)43 (link) were grown as monolayers. Single cell suspensions were obtained by lifting the cells with Cell Dissociation Buffer (Life Technologies; cat. #13151014), sedimented by centrifugation, resuspended in ice cold PBS containing 0.1% BSA (Life Technologies; cat. # 14190250, Sigma; cat. # A3059–100G) and 3 × 105 cells were aliquoted to each well of a 96-well clear v-bottom plate (Fisher; cat. # 7200108). After centrifugation at 500 × g at 4 °C for 5 min, the cells were resuspended in 200 µL of in PBS/BSA containing 30 nM of non-glyc-HS2ST WT, mutants H142A, R189A, or the negative control (R189A/R80E/R184E). After 1 hr at 4 °C, the cells were centrifuged, washed twice with cold PBS/BSA, and resuspended in buffer containing 1 µg/ml of Maltose Binding Protein Monoclonal Antibody (R29) (Fisher; cat. # MA5–14122). After 1 hr at 4 °C, the cells were washed twice, resuspended in a solution containing Alexa Fluor 488-tagged goat anti-mouse IgG (1.25 µg/mL) (Fisher; cat. # A11001) for 30 min. The cells were washed with ice cold PBS and analyzed by flow cytometry (Benton Dickinson FACSCalibur cytometer). Data was analyzed using FlowJo and plotted with Graphpad Prism V7.0 (Graphpad Prism Software Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Syndecan and MMP14 Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were harvested with cell dissociation buffer (Life Technologies), re-suspended in ice-cold sterile filtered 1% BSA/PBS and incubated at 4°C for 30 min in the presence of syndecan-1 (1:50 dilution) syndecan-2 (1:100 dilution) or syndecan-4 (1:50 dilution) antibodies or MMP14 (2 μg/ml) antibody. Cells were washed with ice-cold sterile filtered 1% BSA/PBS and further incubated with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibody for 30 min on ice. Following washing with ice-cold sterile filtered 1% BSA/PBS, cells were analysed on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer and data processed by using CellQuest Pro v6.0 software (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Time course experiments were organized so that the harvesting and staining procedures were synchronised.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Monocyte Enrichment and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Lymphocyte Separation Medium (Wisent, Cat# 305-010-CL).

EasySep human monocytes enrichment kit without CD16 depletion (Stemcell Technologies, Cat# 19059, Vancouver, BC, Canada).

Cell Dissociation Buffer (Life Technologies, Cat# 13151-014).

Bovine Serum Albumins (BSA; Sigma–Aldrich, Cat# ALB001-100).

CCL19 (R&D Systems, Cat# 361-MI-025, Minneapolis, MN, USA).

Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2; Sigma–Aldrich, Cat# P5640-1MG).

Antigen-presenting cells (APCs) from mouse anti-human cluster of differentiation 14 (CD14; BD Biosciences, Mississauga, ON, Canada, Cat# 340436).

Mouse IgG2a APC (R&D Systems, Cat# MAB004).

FACSCalibur Flow Cytometer System (BD Bio-sciences, San Jose, CA, USA).

CellQuest software (BD Biosciences).

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Phagocytosis Assay of Microspheres

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
B/M-2 cells were cultured on a six-well tissue culture plate and incubated with fluorescent microspheres (Fluoresbrite Carboxylate Microspheres; diameter: 0.7 µm; Polysciences, Warrington, PA) for 5 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2. After several washes with PBS to remove non-phagocytosed beads, cells were harvested using Cell Dissociation Buffer (Life Technologies). Cells showing phagocytized particles were analyzed by FACSCalibur.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

TSLP-Induced STAT5 Reporter Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To study the effect of different inhibitors (TSLP-traps, receptor ectodomains, anti-TSLP AMG-157 mAb or derived Fab fragment) on TSLP induced STAT5 reporter assays, HEK293T cells were seeded and transfected as described above. The day after transfection, the cells were detached with cell dissociation buffer (Life Technologies), and resuspended in DMEM+10% fetal bovine serum. Approximately 3% of the cells were seeded in 50 μl medium per well in 96 well plates. In a separate plate, TSLP produced from HEK293S-TetR MGAT−/− cells was incubated in medium with increasing concentrations of the inhibitors for 30 min at room temperature. After this pre-incubation, 50 μl of this TSLP-inhibitor mix was added to the seeded cells. The reported concentrations for inhibitor and TSLP are their final concentrations in this 100 μl volume. Cells were incubated overnight with this mixture and STAT5 reporter luciferase activity was measured 24 h after the start of the stimulation. Fold induction of luciferase activity was calculated by dividing the luminescence signal (counts per second) of the TSLP stimulated cells by the luminescence signal of the unstimulated cells. The data were fitted to a log inhibitor versus response curve in GraphPad Prism.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Detecting Misfolded Proteins in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For detection of misfolded proteins, primary normal cells, primary tumor cells, or cancer cells transfected with adenoviral vectors (Ad-PKR, Ad-Luc, or Ad-Prion) were dissociated with cell dissociation buffer (Life Technologies; catalog #13151014). The collected cells were washed with PBS and suspended in FACS staining buffer (2% fetal bovine serum and 0.02% azide in PBS), and the misfolded anti-PrP antibody AMF-1c-12 (20 μL) or native anti-PrP antibody EP1802Y (20 μL) was added. The cells then were incubated at 4°C for 30 minutes and spun at a relative centrifugal force of 500 for 5 minutes at 4°C. They then were washed three times with 100 μL of FACS staining buffer. After the final wash, the cells were resuspended in a secondary antibody solution (50 μL of 3 μg/mL anti-rabbit IgG AF488), incubated at 4°C for 30 minutes, and spun at a relative centrifugal force of 500 for 5 minutes at 4°C. Next, they were washed three times with 100 μL of FACS staining buffer. After the final wash, the cells were resuspended in 100 μL of a propidium iodide solution (1 μg/mL) and subjected to FACS analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Derivation of Induced Endothelial Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
iECs were derived using a three-dimensional approach with modifications 10 (link). Briefly, to initiate differentiation, iPSCs were cultured in ultra-low, non-adhesive dishes to form embryoid body (EB) aggregates in EBM2 media (Lonza) in the absence of leukemia inhibitor factor (LIF). After 4 days of suspension culture, the EBs were reattached onto 0.2% gelatin-coated dishes and cultured in EBM2 medium supplemented with VEGF-A165 (50 ng/mL; PeproTech). After 3 weeks of differentiation, single cell suspensions were obtained using a cell dissociation buffer (Life Technologies) and labeled with APC-conjugated CD31 (eBiosciences) and PE-conjugated CD144 (BD Biosciences) anti-mouse antibodies. iECs were purified by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) of CD31+CD144+ population. iECs were maintained in EBM2 media supplemented with recombinant murine vascular endothelial growth factor (50 ng/ml).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!