The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

19 protocols using ab18672

1

Multiplexed Immunofluorescence of Tumor Biopsies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor biopsies were embedded in OCT medium containing cryomolds and immediately frozen in 2-methyl-butane. 5 μm frozen sections of the tissues were made using the cryostat and layered on superfrost® plus slides (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL). The slides were fixed in 4% para-formaldehyde for 15 minutes, washed and blocked for 60 minutes at room temperature. The slides were then stained for 3 hours at room temperature (RT) with antibodies for CXCL10 (ab9807) and CXCL8 (ab18672), both from Abcam, Cambridge, MA. The slides were washed 5 times with 1 × PBS and incubated with secondary antibodies anti-rabbit-Alexa 488, anti-mouse-Alexa 647 (both from Cell Signal, Danvers, MA) and with nuclear dye Sytox orange (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for 30 minutes at RT. The slides were washed 5 times with 1 × PBS. Cover slips were mounted on the sections using prolong gold anti-fade solution (Life Technologies). Confocal analyses of stained slides were performed using a LEICA TCS SL DMRE Microsystems.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of CXCL8, CXCR1, and CXCR2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antigen retrieval of 10% formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues was heat-induced in citrate buffer, pH 6.0. Immunohistochemistry was performed using EnVision Dual Link System-HRP, 3.3′-diaminobenzidine (Dako Cytomation, Glostrup, Denmark). The following antibodies were used to detect cellular antigens: mouse antibody against CXCL8 (1:20, #ab18672, Abcam), mouse antibody against CXCR1 (1:50, #ab10400, Abcam), mouse antibody against CXCR2 (1:20, #22106, LifeSpan BioSciences, Seattle, WA). We evaluated the immunohistochemical staining intensity of the cancer nests as a qualitative score compared to that of corresponding normal esophageal epithelium: CXCL8, negative, low, and high; CXCR1, low and high; CXCR2, low and high.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Analysis of IL-8, Integrin αv, and Integrin β3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After routine deparaffinization, rehydration, and antigen retrieval, the sections were incubated with monoclonal antibodies against IL-8 (1:2000, #ab18672, Abcam), integrin αv (1:100; # sc-9969, Santa Cruz), or integrin β3 (1:100, #sc-52,589, Santa Cruz) at 4 °C overnight, followed by incubation with the corresponding secondary antibodies at 37 °C for half an hour and visualization using DAB.
Five representative fields (200× magnification) for each section were randomly selected for histological analysis to evaluate the expression of IL-8, integrin αv and integrin β3. In order to quantify the gene expression level, we used a score based on two parameters: staining intensity and staining area. The staining intensity was scored as 0 (negative), 1 (weak), 2 (moderate), or 3 (strong). The staining area was scored as 0 (0%), 1 (≤5%), 2 (5–50%), or 3 (≥50%). A final score < 4 was defined as negative expression, and a score ≥ 4 was defined as positive expression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Analysis of EMT Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells collected by FACS were washed by PBS and lysed in RIPA buffer. Protein content was determined by the Bradford assay (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Haimen, China). 50μg proteins were separated in a 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to PVDF membrane. The membranes were first blocked with 5% (w/v) nonfat dry milk in TBST and then probed with the indicated primary antibodies with gentle shaking at 4°C overnight. After washing 3 times, the membranes were incubated with the HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h. The signals were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit (Thermo Scientific, Illinois, USA). The anti-E-Cadherin (1: 500 dilution), ani-Vimentin (1: 1000 dilution), anti-IL-8(1: 200 dilution), anti-p16INK4a (1: 500 dilution) and anti-GAPDH (1: 5000 dilution) antibodies were purchased from Abcam Co., MA, USA (Cat # ab323410, ab8069, ab18672, ab108349 and ab8245).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Analysis of Inflammatory Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were lysed in lysis buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) and centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C, and placed on ice for 30 min to obtain the supernatant. The protein concentration was determined using a BCA kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). After being separated by 10% SDS-PAGE (40 µg protein was used), the proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (EMD Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) and blocked for 1 h. The membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with anti-EGR3 (1:500, sc-390967, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA), anti-IL-6 (1:1,000, ab9324, Abcam, Cambridge, USA), anti-IL-8 (1:1,000, ab18672, Abcam), anti-IL-1β (1:1,000, ab156791, Abcam) and anti-β-actin (1:1,000, sc-517582, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) and incubated with secondary antibodies (1:1,000, HRP-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG, A0216, Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) for 2 h at room temperature. Proteins were visualized with an ECL kit (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA). The Gray value was detected by ImageJ 1.48 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Protein Expression Analysis by Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protein expression levels were measured by western blot. In brief, total protein was obtained using the specific protein extraction kit (BestBio Institute of Biotechnology, Wuhan, China). The amounts of total protein were quantified by the BCA assay (Keygen Institute of Biotechnology, Nanjing, China). Protein was resolved by 6–15% SDS/PAGE and transferred onto poly(vinylidene difluoride) membranes (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), then blocked with 5% nonfat milk. Primary antibodies, including P‐gp (1 : 1000; ab170904; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), STAT3 (1 : 1000; ab76315; Abcam), IL‐8 (1 : 1000; ab18672; Abcam), IL‐23 (1 : 1000; ab45420; Abcam), VEGF (1 : 1000; ab46154; Abcam), p‐STAT3 (1 : 1500; 9145; Cell Signaling Technologies, Danvers, MA, USA), MRP1 (1 : 1000; 72202; Cell Signaling Technologies), IL‐1β (1 : 1000; 12703; Cell Signaling Technologies) and p‐NF‐κB (1 : 800; sc‐136548; Santa Cruz Technology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), were added and incubated overnight at 4 °C. The anti‐IgG secondary antibodies (ab205718, ab190475; Abcam) were subsequently applied to the membranes and incubated for 2 h. Immunoreactive signals were revealed by the enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (GE Healthcare, Muenchen, Germany). imagej software (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) was applied to analyze protein expressions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Pemphigus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks of tissue from patients with IgG/IgA pemphigus or conventional pemphigus were cut into 5 μm thick sections for IHC staining. These sections were stained with myeloperoxidase (MPO) (ab9535; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), C5a (ab11877; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), CD89 (ab124717; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), interleukin (IL)-8 (ab18672; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), IL-17 (ab79056; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 (ab76003; Abcam, Cambridge, UK). After autoclaving for antigen retrieval, staining was performed according to the manufactures’ instructions. We used secondary antibodies conjugated to peroxidase with 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole to detect the expression of these molecules. The sections were randomly examined and evaluated blind by a dermatologist (YTC) and a pathologist (YLC). The expression of these molecules in the epidermis was categorized from grade 0 to grade 3 based on staining intensity (Supplementary Figure S1). The number of positive infiltrating cells in the dermis was calculated by averaging the values of three randomly selected high-power fields for each specimen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

IHC Staining of IL-8, Snail, and Vimentin in HNSCC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was performed to detect IL-8, snail, and vimentin expression in HNSCC patient tissue samples. After deparaffinization and rehydration, the tissue slides were heated in a water bath at 100 °C with citrate buffer solution (pH 6.0) for 20 min to retrieve antigen, and then cooled at room temperature. The primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4 °C in a humidified chamber and then visualized using a 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) detection kit (Dako Cytomation, Denmark) containing goat secondary antibody molecules and DAB chromogen. Every step of the wash used phosphate-buffered saline solution (PBS) for 5 min repeated three times. The primary antibodies (with their dilutions reported), including IL-8 (1:1000; ab18672, Abcam, USA), snail (1:1000; ab53519, Abcam, USA), and vimentin (1:200; D21H3, Cell Signaling Technology, USA) were used as the manufacturer’s instructions suggest. The intensity of the IL-8, snail, and vimentin immunoreaction was scored as follows: 0 = negative, absence of stained cells; 1 = weak; 2 = moderate; and 3 = strong. The IHC staining score was calculated by multiplying the percentage of positive cells by the staining intensity. The scoring was conducted by researchers who were blind to the clinical information of patients.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of NLRP3 Inflammasome Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein extraction was performed using RIPA lysis buffer (Pierce, IL, USA) containing protease inhibitor (Roche, CA, USA). Protein extracts were subjected to 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by electro-transfer to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. After 1 h of pre-membrane blocking with 5% BSA, the proteins were incubated with respective primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight followed by secondary antibodies incubation at room temperature for 1 h. The detection of proteins was carried out using ECL reagent. Primary antibodies used in this study include: NRLP3 (1:1000, cat. no. ab214185, Abcam), METTL14 (1:1000, ab223090, Abcam), cleaved caspase-1 (1:1000, ab1872, Abcam), IL-1β (1:1000, ab2105, Abcam) and IL-18 (1:1000, ab18672, Abcam), GSDMD-N (1:1000, bs-14287R, Bioss, Beijing, China) and GAPDH (Invitrogen, cat. no. PA1-987).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunofluorescence analysis of TE cell markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TE cells were seeded onto coverslips overnight and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde phosphate buffer solution (Wako) and incubated with rabbit monoclonal antibody against CD11b (1:100, #ab52478, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), mouse monoclonal antibody against CXCL8 (1:20, #ab18672, Abcam), rabbit polyclonal antibody against CXCR1 (1:50, #sc-988, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX) and CXCR2 (1:50, #sc-682, Santa Cruz) at 4°C overnight. Alexa Fluor® 488-conjugated donkey anti-mouse secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA), Cy3-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) and DyLight 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) were incubated at room temperature for 1 h. The nuclei were stained with DAPI (Wako). Images were taken with a Zeiss LSM 700 laser-scanning microscope and analyzed using the LSM software ZEN 2009 (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!