The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Anymaze 6

Manufactured by Stoelting
Sourced in United Kingdom

AnyMaze™ 6.1 is a comprehensive software package for controlling and tracking animal behavior in a variety of experimental settings. It provides a user-friendly interface for managing experiments, recording data, and analyzing results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using anymaze 6

1

Social Interaction Test for Stress Resilience

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SI testing was performed as previously described under red-light conditions7 (link), 8 (link), 14 (link). First, mice were placed in a Plexiglas open-field arena (42 cm × 42 cm × 42 cm, Nationwide Plastics) with a small wire animal cage placed at one end. Movements were monitored and recorded automatically for 2.5 min with a tracking system (AnyMaze™ 6.1, Stoelting Co) to determine baseline exploratory behaviour and locomotion in the absence of a social target (AGG). At the end of the 2.5 min, the mouse was removed, and the arena was cleaned. Next, exploratory behaviour in the presence of a novel male CD-1 social target inside the small wire animal cage was measured for 2.5 min and time spent in the interaction and corner zones and overall locomotion were compared. SI ratio was calculated by dividing the time spent in the interaction zone when the AGG was present vs absent. All mice with a SI ratio below 1.0 were classified as stress-susceptible (SS) and all mice with a SI ratio above 1.0 were classified as resilient (RES).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Anxiety-like Behavior Assessment in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The open field test was performed one day before inoculation (pre-infection), and 3 and 5 days after inoculation (dpi). The apparatus used in the test consisted of a white wooden box (30 × 30 × 40 cm) with the floor divided into nine squares of 10 × 10 cm with homogeneous illumination. Each animal was placed in the center of the arena and kept in the apparatus for three minutes. A video camera connected to a computer was fixed two meters above the apparatus and used to record each session for later analysis with AnyMaze 6.1 software (Stoelting). The following variables were analyzed: Distance traveled (m), number of lines crossed, and immobility time (s). After each test, the apparatus was cleaned with 70% ethanol to minimize olfactory cues. Twenty animals from each environment were submitted to the test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Evaluating Spatial Learning and Memory in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MWM test was used to examine learning and memory in rats. The MWM test was performed according to previous literature (Vorhees and Williams 2006 (link)). Briefly, a black circular pool (1.5 m in diameter) filled with water and computer tracking software (Anymaze 6.1, Stoelting, USA) were used in the test. Rats were trained for three consecutive days before exposure. At 1 d, 2 d, 3 d, 7 d, and 14 d after radiation, the learning and memory function of rats was evaluated. In this test, rats were placed at water level and then released into the water (temperature 19–23 ℃) at a specific location from four semirandom start positions as described in previous literature (Vorhees and Williams 2006 (link)). At the moment that the rats were released, the tracking program was started. If rats arrived at the platform that was submerged 1.5 cm below the water surface and remained in that location, the program was stopped. The time limit was 1 min per trial. Each session consisted of four trials. The average escape latency (AEL) of rats was recorded after a session.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Open Field Locomotor Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three days after hypoxic stress, mice were placed in the open field arena (65 × 45 × 65 cm) and video recorded for their locomotor activity over a 30 min period. Time spent in center, total distance, and average speed were tracked and measured using the ANY-maze 6.1 automated software (Stoelting, Wood Dale, IL). Experimenters were blinded during video and statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Behavioral Tests for Rodent Movement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The behavioral tests were based on our previous studies [16 (link)]. In all tests, the movements of the rats were tracked with a digital camera and analyzed using the computer software ANYMAZE™ 6.1 (Stoelting Europe, Ireland). All experiments were conducted between 8 a.m. and 12 a.m. during the light phase; the intervals between the tests were 2 days. All parts of the apparatus were cleaned right after each animal with 60% ethanol to remove odor cues.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Altruistic and Exploratory Behaviors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The number of nose poke responses was counted by a software (MED-PC V, Med Associates, Inc). To quantify individual preferences of altruistic over selfish responses or left and right nose pokes we calculated a decision preference score, as following: (number of altruistic responses - number of selfish responses) / total number of responses. Video images were analyzed a posteriori for scoring of exploratory behavior using Anymaze 6.2 (Stoelting, UK) and Boris.46 We measured the time spent by the recipient and the actor in social exploration in the area (highlighted in red, Fig. 1h) in the proximity of the adjacent compartment, where they could explore each other.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Altruistic and Exploratory Behaviors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The number of nose poke responses was counted by a software (MED-PC V, Med Associates, Inc). To quantify individual preferences of altruistic over selfish responses or left and right nose pokes we calculated a decision preference score, as following: (number of altruistic responses - number of selfish responses) / total number of responses. Video images were analyzed a posteriori for scoring of exploratory behavior using Anymaze 6.2 (Stoelting, UK) and Boris.46 We measured the time spent by the recipient and the actor in social exploration in the area (highlighted in red, Fig. 1h) in the proximity of the adjacent compartment, where they could explore each other.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Observational Fear Conditioning in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The apparatus consisted of two identical and adjacent fear conditioning chambers (Ugo Basile, 24×20×30 cm) separated by a transparent Plexiglas partition. Olfactory and auditory cues could be transmitted between the chambers. A demonstrator mouse (previously recipient in the SDM task) and an observer (previously actor in the SDM task) were individually placed in the two chambers and allowed to explore the chambers for 5 min (baseline). Then, a 2-s foot shock (0.7 mA) was delivered every 10 s for 4 min to the demonstrator mouse using a behavior tracking software (Anymaze 6.0, Stoelting). The same pairs of mice tested in the SDM were used. Based on previous studies,28 (link) we used 10-s intervals for foot shocks and a 4-min training. At the end of the procedure mice returned to their home-cage.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Operant Chamber Dyadic Social Interaction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Experiments were conducted in a standard operant chamber (actor’s compartment, L: 24 cm x W: 20 cm x H: 18,5 cm; ENV-307W-CT; Med Associates, Inc.) fused with a custom-made small triangle-shaped chamber that hosted the recipient (L: 18 x W: 14 cm x H: 18,5). The separation wall between the compartments (operant chamber and recipient chamber) was replaced by a metal mesh with 1cm holes that allowed social exploration and nose-to-nose interaction. The actor’s compartment was equipped with two nose poke holes and a food magazine between them, for delivery of food rewards (14 mg; Test Diet, 5-TUL). The recipient’s compartment presented only a food magazine connected to a food dispenser. The setup was placed inside a sound attenuating cubicle (ENV-022V, Med Associates, Inc) homogeneously and dimly lit (6 ± 1 lux) to minimize gradients in light, temperature, sound, and other environmental conditions that could produce a side preference. All tasks were controlled by custom scripts written in MED-PC IV (Med Associates, Inc.). A digital camera (Imaging Source, DMK 22AUC03 monochrome) was placed on top of the setup to record the test using a behavioral tracking system (Anymaze 6.0, Stoelting).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Observational Fear Conditioning in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The apparatus consisted of two identical and adjacent fear conditioning chambers (Ugo Basile, 24×20×30 cm) separated by a transparent Plexiglas partition. Olfactory and auditory cues could be transmitted between the chambers. A demonstrator mouse (previously recipient in the SDM task) and an observer (previously actor in the SDM task) were individually placed in the two chambers and allowed to explore the chambers for 5 min (baseline). Then, a 2-s foot shock (0.7 mA) was delivered every 10 s for 4 min to the demonstrator mouse using a behavior tracking software (Anymaze 6.0, Stoelting). The same pairs of mice tested in the SDM were used. Based on previous studies,28 (link) we used 10-s intervals for foot shocks and a 4-min training. At the end of the procedure mice returned to their home-cage.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!