The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

0.22 μm polycarbonate filter

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States

The 0.22-μm polycarbonate filters are a type of laboratory equipment used for filtration. They have a pore size of 0.22 micrometers, which allows them to effectively remove particles and microorganisms from liquids.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using 0.22 μm polycarbonate filter

1

Monitoring Water Quality in Algae Bioreactor

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Water samples (250 mL) were taken from the water sample tape from the outlet of the algae bioreactor of all the six systems every 12 h for the analysis of total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), nitrite nitrogen (NO2-N), nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), and chemical oxygen demand (COD) according to standard methods [27 (link)]. All the water samples were stored at 4°C immediately after the collection and were analyzed for 12 hours. Microbial samples in both the biofilter and water were taken at the end of stage I (10 cycles) from the six systems. In detail, 15 plastic suspension fillers were randomly selected from each MBBR system. The biofilms attached to the fillers were collected by shaking in 30 mL of sterile seawater with 100 μL of stabilizer (Tween 80 detergent solution) using a vortex mixer for 10 min. Then, the solution was filtered through a 0.22 μm polycarbonate filter (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) to collect the microorganisms. Similarly, 500 mL of water sampled from each system was filtered through a 0.22 μm polycarbonate filter (Millipore, MA, USA) to collect the microorganisms in the water. All the processed samples were stored at −80°C prior to DNA extraction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Bacterial 16S rRNA Sequencing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The remaining inoculum (~470 mL) of each replicate was filtered onto 0.22-μm polycarbonate filters (Millipore, Ireland), which were stored at −80 °C until used for DNA extraction. DNA from the 105 samples was extracted using the FastDNA for soil kit (MP Biomedical, Santa Ana, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, except that the beating speed was set to 6.0 m/s for 80 s. The universal primer pair 515 F (5ʹ-GTG YCA GCM GCC GCG GTA-3ʹ) and 907R (5ʹ-CCG YCA ATT YMT TTR AGT TT-3ʹ) was used to amplify the V4-V5 region of the bacterial 16 S rRNA genes. The PCR products were purified, mixed in equal amounts, and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq platform with the 2 × 300 bp paired-end protocol at the Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Dinoflagellate Pigment Profiling via HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Aliquots of 30–50 mL of dinoflagellate cultures were filtered through precombusted GF/F filters. Pigments were extracted with N,N-dimethylformamide in a freezer (−20 °C) for 2 h, and the extracts were filtered through 0.22-μm polycarbonate filters (Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) to remove cell debris. Pigment concentrations were measured using a Shimadzu LC20A-DAD HPLC system fitted with a 3.5 μm Eclipse XDB C8 column (100 × 4.6 mm; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) according to the method presented by Zapata et al. [35 (link)]. The HPLC system was calibrated with 26 authentic pigment standards from the Danish Hydraulic Institute Water and Environment (Hørsholm, Denmark), which included chlorophyll a (Chl a), chlorophyll b, chlorophyll c2 (Chl c2), chlorophyll c3 (Chl c3), chlorophyllide a, divinyl Chl a, magnesium 2,4-divinylpheoporphyrin a5 monomethyl ester, pheophytin a, pheophorbide a, β,β-carotene, β,ε-carotene, alloxanthin, antheraxanthin, 19′-butanoyloxyfucoxanthin, canthaxanthin, diadinoxanthin, diatoxanthin, echinenone, fucoxanthin, 19′-hexanoyloxyfucoxanthin, lutein, neoxanthin, peridinin, prasinoxanthin, violaxathin, and zeaxanthin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Fixation and Preservation of Biomass

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Biomass freshly collected from the bioreactor on day 1,256, and sludge collected on the same day and location as the inoculum for the enrichment culture, was fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde as described elsewhere90 (link). Fixed samples were filtered onto 0.22 μm polycarbonate filters (Millipore) and stored at −20 °C until analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Prokaryotic and Bacterial Productivity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prokaryotic cells were counted using a flow cytometer (FacsCalibur, Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany) following the method of Gasol et al. (1999) (link). Calculations were performed using the software program “Cell Quest Pro,” plotting the emission fluorescence of SYBR Green I (488 nm) vs. the side scatter. Picocyanobacteria were similarly counted on the basis of their signature in a plot of orange (FL2) vs. red (FL3) fluorescence.
The incorporation of 3H-leucine (140 Ci mmol-1) was measured to estimate heterotrophic bacterial productivity in 10-mL water samples. Triplicate samples were incubated at a final concentration of 100 nM for at least 1 h at the in situ temperature in the dark. Incorporation was stopped by fixing the cells with formaldehyde (5% v/v). A fourth sample, serving as a blank, was fixed for at least 10 min prior to the addition of the radioactively labeled substrate. The samples were filtered onto 0.22-μm polycarbonate filters (Millipore), which were then placed in 4 mL of scintillation cocktail. The incorporated substrate was counted in a scintillation counter (Packard). Bacterial carbon production was calculated from 3H-leucine incorporation according to Simon and Azam (1987) (link), using a leucine mol% value of 7.3 and a carbon conversion factor of 0.86.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Aplysina aerophoba Sponge Sampling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Six sponge adults of Aplysina aerophoba were collected by SCUBA diving in June 2014 in Cala Montgó, Spain (42°06′ 52.6″N, 3°10′ 02.0″E) at 7.8 to 12.7 m depth. Individual samples were taken at locations between 3 to 15 meters apart from each other. They were collected using gloves, cutting approximately 5 cm3 of the sponge tissue and placing it in 50 mL sterile tubes. The in situ identification was done visually by Dr. Detmer Sipkema. Seawater was collected in the immediate vicinity of the sponges (at minimally 1 m of distance), in four locations, using 3 L sterile containers to compare putative sponge-associated bacterial proteins to bacterioplankton proteins. Immediately after collection, the sponge pieces were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at −80 °C. Seawater samples were filtered through a 0.22 μm polycarbonate filter (Millipore) and the filters were preserved at −80 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Bacterial Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Individual cell morphology was determined via scanning electron microscopy (SEM; Fig. 1). Bacterial samples for SEM were initially fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1mol L‐1 cacodylate for 72 h at 4°C. Samples were then pulled onto a 0.22 μm polycarbonate filter (Millipore, Billerica, MA), washed in a graded ethanol series (50%, 75%, and 100%) and placed in hexamethyldisilazane for 1 h at room temperature. Filters were then mounted, palladium‐coated (Hummer VI, Union City, CA), and visualized using a Phenom desktop SEM (FEI Instruments, Hillsboro, OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Marine Shrimp Larval Development Sampling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Shrimps and rearing water were collected from a commercial marine shrimp hatchery from 10 March to 28 April, 2014 in Hainan, China. Healthy shrimp and rearing water were taken from ponds where shrimp larvae had normal feeding behavior, black intestine and/or no apparent sign of disease by visual inspection. Samples covered all key developmental periods: zoea 1 (Z1), zoea 3 (Z3), mysis 1 (M1), mysis 3 (M3), postlarvae 1 (P1), postlarvae 3 (P3), and postlarvae 6 (P6) (a developmental time line was shown in Figure 1). Diseased shrimps and rearing water were obtained from ponds where shrimps presented poor growth, inactivity, lack of appetite, empty digestive tracts and/or low survival rate. Shrimp larvae were collected randomly from each pond. Details of the experimental design for sampling was shown in Supplementary Table S1. The surface of shrimp larvae was sprayed with 75% ethanol, and then washed with sterile seawater three times to remove adherent microorganisms. Rearing water was collected with 250 ml sterilized beaker from four different locations in each pond and then pooled. One liter of pooled rearing water was filtered through a 0.22 μm polycarbonate filter (Millipore). All the samples were stored at -80°C for 2 months until DNA extraction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!