The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

E soft software

Manufactured by Siemens
Sourced in United States

E.soft software is a laboratory information management system (LIMS) developed by Siemens. It provides a comprehensive solution for managing the workflow and data of analytical laboratories. The core function of E.soft software is to streamline laboratory processes, ensure data integrity, and facilitate regulatory compliance.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using e soft software

1

Multimodal Imaging of Prostate Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 68Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT images were reviewed by consensus between three experienced nuclear medicine physicians by using Siemens MMWP workstation. PCa lesions were distinguished from the surrounding normal prostate tissues by visual analysis. To calculate the 68Ga-PSMA-617 uptake of the primary PCa lesion, circular regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn around areas with focally increased uptake in transaxial slices by using e.soft software (Siemens) at a 30% threshold, and SUVmax was calculated automatically. Scans were considered positive when the focal uptake of 68Ga-PSMA-617 was superior to the background activity. Semiquantitative measures comprised SUVmax and SUVratio (explained below under “Statistical analysis”).
The positive criterion for mpMRI is an abnormal focal signal increase or decrease. The readers were instructed to decide on the basis of their overall impression by using the 5-point Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score19 (link): 1, PCa highly unlikely; 2, PCa unlikely; 3, equivocal PCa; 4, PCa likely; and 5, PCa highly likely. At the patient level, data were dichotomized (score of 1–2, PCa negative; score of 3–5, PCa positive) using the highest score per patient.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Tumor Uptake Analysis on 68Ga-FAPI-PET/CT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tracer uptake in all patients was determined by quantification of mean and maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmean and SUVmax). Regarding SUV calculation, circular volumes of interest were drawn around tumor lesions on transaxial slices and automatically adapted to a 3-dimensional VOI with e.soft software (Siemens) at a 60% isocontour. Evaluation of normal organs was conducted with a 1 cm diameter (for the small organs thyroid, parotid gland, myocardium, oral mucosa, spinal cord, ovaries) or 2 cm diameter (brain, muscle, liver, pancreas, spleen, kidney, fat, aortic lumen content, lung, mamma, endometrium) sphere placed inside the organ parenchyma. Tumor-to-background ratios (TBRs) were determined for quantification of image contrast. The geometric mean of the quotients of lesion (SUVmax) to background tissue (SUVmean) formed the TBR, measured for metastases in lymph nodes (relative to fat tissue), bone (relative to bone spongiosa), liver (relative to liver parenchyma), peritoneal carcinomatosis (relative to fat), and lung (relative to lung parenchyma). Additionally, the TBRs of all identified tumors were formed in relation to blood pool, muscle, and fat tissue. The 68 Ga-FAPI-PET/CT scans were analyzed by one board-certified radiologist, one board-certified radiation oncologist, and two board-certified nuclear medicine physicians in consensus.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative PET Imaging of FAPI Tracers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tracer biodistribution in patients was quantified by SUVmean and SUVmax at 1 h after injection for 68Ga-FAPI-2, 68Ga-FAPI-4, and 18F-FDG. The interval between 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI examinations was 9 d maximum, and no treatment change took place in between. For calculation of the SUV, circular regions of interest were drawn around the tumor lesions with focally increased uptake in transaxial slices and automatically adapted to a 3-dimensional volume of interest with e.soft software (Siemens) at a 40% isocontour. The normal organs were evaluated with a 1-cm-diameter (for the small organs [thyroid, parotid gland, myocardium, oral mucosa, and spinal cord]) to 2-cm-diameter (brain, muscle, liver, spleen, kidney, fat, aortic lumen content, and lung) sphere placed inside the organ parenchyma.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multimodal Imaging Analysis of PET/CT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All images obtained were examined on an LCD monitor as both attenuation-corrected and uncorrected multiplanar PET, CT, and FDG-PET/CT fusion cross-sections (maximum intensity projection=MIP), using the eSOFT software (Siemens).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for Prostate Cancer Staging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After histopathological confirmation of prostate cancer, all patients underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT for further staging. One hour (±10 min) after intravenous injection of 68Ga-PSMA-11, synthesized as previously described19 (link), scans were performed on a Biograph 6 PET/CT Scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Initially, a CT scan (130 keV, 80 mAs; CareDose) without contrast medium was acquired. Corrected for dead time, scatter and decay, statistic emission scans were performed from the vertex to the proximal leg, requiring eight bed positions with 3 min per bed position. Image reconstruction was performed using CT-based attenuation correction with the ordered subset expectation maximization algorithm including four iterations with eight subsets and Gaussian filtering to an in-plane spatial resolution of 5 mm at full-width at half-maximum. Circular regions of interest were drawn in transaxial slices into areas with increased uptake and automatically adapted to a three-dimensional volume of interest with e.soft software (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) at a 50% isocontour to calculate standardized uptake values (SUVs).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Tracer Biodistribution Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tracer biodistribution in patients was quantified by mean and maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmeim and SUVmax) at 1 h post injection. For SUV calculation, circular regions of interest were drawn around the tumors on transaxial slices and automatically adapted to a three-dimensional VOI with e.soft software {Siemens) at a 60 % isocontour.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

FLT and FMISO PET/CT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PET/CT scans were performed centrally at baseline and during C1 and C5. Patients remained in the study irrespective of FLT tumour uptake during the baseline scan. Images were acquired on a hybrid scanner (Biograph Duo; Siemens/CTI; Malvern, PA, USA) and were evaluated by two nuclear medicine physicians blinded to study results. In cases where PET scan could not determine tumour volume, a CT scan was used. For quantitative tumour uptake, SUVmax was calculated with eSOFT software (Siemens Medical Solutions; Siemens/CTI, Malvern, PA, USA) using the single maximum pixel count within the volumes of interest (VOIs) placed in the area showing highest tumour activity [46 (link)]. TTR was calculated for both FLT- and FMISO-PET. PTAc and hypoxic tumour activity (HTAc) were calculated by multiplying volume of the lesion with its corresponding mean SUV of FLT and FMISO. Volume of each lesion was calculated using an automated contouring program based on the SUV using a threshold of 50% of SUVmax. Details of PET scan reconstruction and FLT synthesis and quantification are provided in Appendix A.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Tracer Biodistribution Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
During the dosimetry evaluation, urine was collected at the following intervals: 0–2 h, 2–4 h, and 4–6 h. Venous blood samples were obtained at 2, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60, 80, 120, 180, 240, and 360 min post injection. After the whole blood was sampled, the remaining volume was centrifuged and serum was extracted. Serum activities were measured in a well counter and corrected for decay. Activity concentrations in blood vs. serum were compared using the individually determined (clinical routine lab) hematocrit. Total blood volume was estimated from size, weight, and hematocrit.
The tracer biodistribution in patients was quantified by SUVmean and SUVmax at 1 h and 3 h post injection. For calculation of the standardized uptake value (SUV), circular regions of interest were drawn around the area with focally increased uptake in transaxial slices and automatically adapted to a three-dimensional VOI with e.soft software (Siemens) at a 40 % isocontour. Primary tumors and lymph node metastases were evaluated separately. The normal bladder (after voiding), background (pelvic fat), blood, brain, salivary and lacrimal glands, lung, liver, spleen, pancreas, small intestine, and kidneys were evaluated with a 2–3 cm sphere placed inside the organ parenchyma.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Tracer Biodistribution and SUV in Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tracer biodistribution in all patients was quantified by mean and maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmean and SUVmax), at 1 h after application. Calculating the SUV, circular regions of interest were drawn around the tumors on transaxial slices and automatically adapted to a 3-dimensional VOI with e.soft software (Siemens) at a 60% isocontour. Evaluation of normal organs was conducted with a 1-cm diameter (for the small organs, thyroid, parotid gland, myocardium, oral mucosa, spinal cord) or 2-cm diameter (the brain, muscle, liver, pancreas, spleen, kidney, fat, aortic lumen content, lung) sphere placed inside the organ parenchyma. The 68Ga-FAPI-PET/CT scans were analyzed by one board-certified radiologist, one board-certified radiation oncologist, and two board-certified nuclear medicine physicians in consensus. For the determination of tumor-to-background analyses (TBR), the geometrical mean was used. In defining the SUVs, median and range were utilized.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

SPECT Image Reconstruction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All studies were uniformly processed with commercially available E.soft software (Siemens, USA) on a Syngo nuclear medicine workstation (Siemens, USA). SPECT images were reconstructed with the Flash-3D software (Siemens Medical Solutions, USA) with 8 subsets and 4 iterations. Subsequently, tomographic slices were generated and displayed as transaxial, coronal, and sagittal slices. SPECT emission images were co-registered and fused with CT images using the object versus the target matrix method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!