The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Pam chlorophyll fluorometer

Manufactured by Walz
Sourced in Germany

The PAM chlorophyll fluorometer is a laboratory instrument used to measure the fluorescence of chlorophyll in plant samples. It provides a non-invasive method to assess the photosynthetic activity and health of the plant.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

13 protocols using pam chlorophyll fluorometer

1

Chlorophyll Fluorescence Kinetics Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The kinetics of chlorophyll (Chl) fluorescence was measured with Dual-PAM-100 or PAM-100 (Heinz Walz, Effeltrich, Germany). A transient post-illumination increase in Chl fluorescence in Arabidopsis leaves was measured after the termination of actinic light (120 μmol photons m−2 s−1 for 2 min) using a PAM 100 as previously described (Kofer et al., 1998 (link)).
The Data Acquisition Software installed in a computer connected to Dual-PAM-100 automatically calculates the Chl fluorescence parameters, Yield (II), NPQ, and Yield (I).
Fd-dependent PQ reduction activity in ruptured chloroplasts was detected by increases in Chl fluorescence by adding NADPH (0.25 mM) and Fd (5 mM) under the illumination of weak measuring light (1.0 μmol m−2 s−1) using a PAM 100, as described by a previous study (Endo et al., 1998 (link)).
The redox state of P700 was measured with a PAM chlorophyll fluorometer (Walz, Effeltrich, Germany) equipped with an emitter-detector ED-P700DW-E unit. P700 absorbance changes were monitored by absorbance at 810–830 nm (Schreiber et al., 1986 (link); Klughammer and Schreiber, 1998 (link)). An initial reduction rate (0–1 s) of P700+ was estimated as CET activity (Wu et al., 2011 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Chlorophyll Fluorescence and REC Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Fv/Fm was measured using an imaging pulse-amplitude-modulated (PAM) chlorophyll fluorometer (Heinz Walz, GmbH, Effeltrich, Germany) according to the method described by Li et al.5 (link). The REC was determined and calculated as described by Hong et al.32 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Senescence Progression Evaluation Across Plant Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To investigate a difference in the progression of senescence between the plant lines, we performed a variety of methods that are described in detail by Bresson et al. (2018) (link). Therefore, we harvested six plants (n=6) per plant line weekly, starting in the state before bolting at week 4 up to week 9, when leaves are heavily senescent. For the evaluation of leaf senescence phenotypes, rosette leaves were aligned according to their age with the help of color threads. Leaves of the first rosettes were aligned next to each other in order of their age. The automated colorimetric assay (ACA) defines leaf color pixel-wise and calculates the percentage of each category within the leaves, thereby providing information about chlorophyll degradation during senescence visible by a color change from green over yellow to brown. The activity of photosystem II (PSII) was assessed using a PAM chlorophyll fluorometer (Maxi version; version 2-46i, Heinz Walz). Therefore, Fv/Fm values were determined from leaf 5 and leaf 10. In addition, we measured the intracellular hydrogen peroxide level in leaf 8 using the fluorescent dye H2DCFDA. Electrolyte leakage was determined using a conductivity meter (CM100-2, Reid & Associates).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Measuring Photosynthetic Efficiency via PAM Fluorometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chlorophyll fluorescence was measured with a Pulse-Amplitude-Modulation (PAM) Chlorophyll Fluorometer (Heinz-Walz GmbH, Effeltrich, Germany) as previously described [23 (link)]. Briefly, plants were dark-adapted for 30 min to measure the maximum quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII). Fv/Fm and electron transport rate (ETR) was recorded during a saturating photon pulse (4000 μmol m−2 s−1) using a whole leaf.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Photosynthetic Redox Dynamics Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chlorophyll fluorescence and the redox state of P700 were measured with PAM chlorophyll fluorometer (Walz, Effeltrich, Germany) with an emitter-detector (ED-101 US) for chlorophyll fluorescence and another (ED-P700DW-E) for P700 absorbance changes monitored by the absorbance at 810–830 nm. The fluorometer setup was as described as by the previous studies (Schreiber et al., 1986 (link)) and (Klughammer and Schreiber, 1998 ). The dark level chlorophyll fluorescence (Fo) was measured with a weak, modulated red light (650 nm, 0.09 μmol photons m-2 s-1). Maximum chlorophyll fluorescence (Fm) was measured after a 0.8 s pulse of saturated white light. Maximum quantum efficiency of PS II was determined by Fv/Fm. ΦPSII, the photochemical efficiency of PSII, was calculated as (F′m - F)/F′m; qP and qN were calculated as (F′m - F)/(F′m - F′o) and 1 - (F′m - F′o)/(Fm - Fo), respectively, after steady-state photosynthesis was reached (15 min of light induction together with saturating pulses of 0.8 s every 30 s), and Fm here was determined before stress. The halftime of the oxidation of P700 was determined after reaching a steady state level of P700+ by illumination with FR (>705 nm, 5.2 μmol m-2 s-1) and that of re-reduction of the P700+ was determined after a 6 s illumination with FR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Photosynthetic Traits of Tomato Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Shoot and root length was determined by scale. Samples were oven dried at 70 °C for 24 h and then weighed.
Photosynthetic pigment contents were analyzed using the acetone extract method32 (link). Acetone (80%) was used to extract fresh leaf tissues, and absorbance read at 480 nm, 645 nm, 663 nm with a spectrophotometer (Beckman 640D, USA).
Leaf gas exchange measurements viz. net photosynthetic rate (Pn), carbon dioxide assimilation rate (A), stomatal conductance (gs) and transpiration rate (E) were measured on fully expanded horizontal leaves in full and bright sunlight between 10:00 h and 12:00 h using IRGA (LCA-4 model Analytical development Company, Hoddesdon England).
Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were recorded with a junior PAM chlorophyll fluorometer (H. Walz, Effeltrich, Germany) on fully expanded horizontal tomato leaves33 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Photosynthetic Oxygen Evolution Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Photosynthetic oxygen evolution was determined in vivo using a Clark-type oxygen electrode (Hansatech Instruments RS232, Norfolk, UK). Two milliliters of treated or untreated cultures were transferred to the measurement chamber. Oxygen formation was measured for 10 min at room temperature under illumination at 50 µE. PSII activity was analyzed in vivo with a WATER- pulse amplitude modulation (PAM) chlorophyll fluorometer (Walz GmbH, Effeltrich, Germany). All samples were dark-adapted for 5 min before measurement. Measurement of the PSII quantum yield (Fν/Fm) was performed at room temperature with WinControl Data Acquisition software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Measuring PSII Activity via Photosynthetic O2 Evolution

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PSII activity was determined using the benzoquinone (BQ) photosynthetic evolution rate of O2 and the quantum yield efficiency, which detected the changes in chlorophyll fluorescence. Photosynthetic O2 evolution was measured at 25°C (Hansatech Instruments, Ltd., Norfolk, England) with a Clark-type oxygen electrode, according to the method described by Mi et al. (1995)53 . Cells (2 mL) were collected from the sample tube and injected into the reaction chamber, followed by suspension in BQ, to a final concentration of 10 μM. The intensity of the action light (AL) used to measure photosynthetic O2 evolution was 800 μE m−2 s−1. Changes in chlorophyll fluorescence were measured using a pulse amplitude modulated (PAM) chlorophyll fluorometer (Heinz Walz GmbH., Effeltrich, Germany) and an emitter-detector-cuvette assembly (ED-101US; Heinz Walz GmbH) with a unit 101ED, as described elsewhere54 (link)55 56 (link). To detect a visible change between the PSII activity of the treated and untreated cells, the quantum yield of PSII was detected by a new pulse-amplitude modulated imaging system that measures active fluorescence (Heinz Walz GmbH., Germany), which is described in detail elsewhere57 (link)58 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Photosynthetic Capability Assessment in Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Photosynthetic capability was measured according to the method of Yang et al. (2014) (link). In brief, 2-week-old seedlings were tested by withholding water treatment for 15 days. Chlorophyll fluorescence was measured using a pulse-amplitude modulation (PAM) chlorophyll fluorometer (Heinz-Walz-GmbH, Effeltrich, Germany). To measure the maximum quantum yield of PSII, plants were dark-adapted for 30 min. Fv/Fm was recorded during a saturating photon pulse (4000 μmol·m−2·s−1) using a whole plant. Fv/Fm was calculated as follows: Fv/Fm = (Fm -Fo)/Fm (Genty et al., 1989 ). Images of fluorescence parameters were created using the machine. The rapid light curves were drawn as a plot of the electron transport rate (ETR), where ETR = the effective quantum yield (ΦPSII) × Photon flux density(PFD) × 0.5 × leaf absorptivity coefficient) (Kalaji et al., 2014 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Redox Dynamics of Photosynthetic Quinone

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The redox change of PQ was monitored by Chl fluorescence, using a PAM Chlorophyll Fluorometer (Walz, Effeltrich, Germany) with an emitter–detector–cuvetter assembly (ED-101 US). Details for fluorometer setup were described previously (Schreiber et al., 1994 , 1995 (link)). The cell suspension was pipetted in a cuvetter with a thermostat. Cells were exposed to the actinic light (AL, 3 Wm-2) for 30 s. Then AL was turned off and the transient increase kinetics in chlorophyll fluorescence was detected. Each sample was adapted in the dark for 2 min prior to measurement. As for treatment with the cyclic photophosphorylation cofactor, 100 μM of phenazine methosulphate (PMS) was added to the sample before measurement; and with the Calvin cycle inhibitor, iodoacetamide (IA) was pre-incubated with the sample at low concentration (40 μM) and high concentration (1 mM). As for dark starvation, cells of Synechocystis PCC 6803 were pre-treated in dark for 24–32 h before measurement. Every experiment was repeated three times at least.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!