The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

57 protocols using ribogreen assay

1

Genomic DNA and RNA Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from snap-frozen tissue and/or whole blood using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The concentration of DNA samples was quantified by nanodrop and PicoGreen assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). RNA was obtained using the RNeasy Mini or Micro kit (Qiagen, Germany) and quantified with nanodrop or RiboGreen assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The integrity and quality of nucleic acid samples were analyzed by BioAnalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) (Supplementary Methods S2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Nucleic Acid Extraction and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from fresh frozen tissue or whole blood using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen), and quantified with the PicoGreen assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific). RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen), and quantified with the RiboGreen assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific). DNA and RNA quality and integrity was analyzed by BioAnalyzer (Agilent Technologies) and Fragment Analyzer (Advanced Analytics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Zika Virus Detection by RT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Example 1

RNA from cultured MR 766 Zika virus was extracted using QIAmp Viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen). Total RNA was quantitated using RiboGreen Assay (ThermoFisher Scientific), Qubit (ThermoFisher Scientific), and NanoDrop (ThermoFisher Scientific). Quantitative real-time RT-PCR was run using primers and probes targeting the E, NS3, and NS5 regions at varying concentrations of Zika RNA (i.e., 2.5×104 and 2.5×106 copies of RNA/ml). Results show that the primers and probes are able to detect the E regions (SEQ ID NOs:1, 5, and 9), NS3 (SEQ ID NOs:3, 7, and 11), and NS5 (SEQ ID NOs:2, 6, and 10) (see FIG. 1). Further studies were conducted on a wider range of Zika RNA starting concentrations (from 2.5×100, 2.5×101, 2.5×102, 2.5×103, 2.5×104, and 2.5×105 copies of RNA/ml), showing that primers and probes were able to detect the E and NS5 regions of Zika virus in a dose-dependent fashion (see FIG. 2). Additional assays targeting the E region, in the presence of an internal reference control set of primers/probes, demonstrate the capacity of the Zika virus primers and probes to detect Zika virus and to be multiplexed with other assays for detection (see FIG. 3).

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Hepatic Fibrosis Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total liver RNA was extracted using the Purelink kit (Thermo Fisher, Carlsbad, CA), with on-column DNase treatment as per the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA integrity and lack of contaminating genomic DNA was confirmed by visualization on agarose gels, and RNA concentration was determined using the Ribogreen assay (Thermo Fisher, Carlsbad, CA). A total of 2 μg of RNA was converted to cDNA using the TaqMan High Capacity Reverse Transcription kit (Thermo Fisher, Carlsbad, CA) in a final volume of 20 μL. Quantitative PCR was conducted using TaqMan hydrolysis probe assays, using 2 μL of cDNA (diluted 1:15), 10 μL Taqman universal PCR master mix, 1.0 μL Taqman primer/probe mix in a final volume of 20 μL per reaction. The mouse gene expression assays used included procollagen type Iα2 (Col1a2; Mm00483888_m1), αSMA (Acta2, Mm01546133_m1), and TATA-box binding protein (Tbp; Mm01277045_m1). All expression levels were normalized to that of Tbp in the same sample, and the data expressed as the expression level relative to nonfibrotic controls, using the ΔΔCT method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

DNA/RNA Extraction and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen) and quantified with the PicoGreen assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific). RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen) and quantified with the RiboGreen assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific). A Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies) and Fragment Analyzer (Advanced Analytics) were used to characterize DNA and RNA quality and integrity. We then prepared samples for whole-exome sequencing (WES) and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Zika Virus Detection Assay Development

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Example 1

RNA from cultured MR 766 Zika virus was extracted using QIAmp Viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen). Total RNA was quantitated using RiboGreen Assay (ThermoFisher Scientific), Qubit (ThermoFisher Scientific), and NanoDrop (ThermoFisher Scientific). Quantitative real time RT-PCR was run using primers and probes targeting the E, NS3, and NS5 regions at varying concentration of Zika RNA (i.e., 2.5×104 and 2.5×106 copies of RNA/ml). Results show that the primers and probes are able to detect the E regions (SEQ ID NOs:1, 5, and 9), NS3 (SEQ ID NOs:3, 7, and 11), and NS5 (SEQ ID NOs:2,6, and 10) (see FIG. 1). Further studies were conducted on a wider range of Zika RNA starting concentrations (from 2.5×100, 2.5×101, 2.5×102, 2.5×103, 2.5×104, and 2.5×105 copies of RNA/ml), showing that primers and probes were able to detect the E and NS5 regions of Zika virus in a dose-dependent fashion (see FIG. 2). Additional assays targeting the E region. In the presence of an internal reference control set of primers/probes, demonstrate the capacity of the Zika virus primers and probes to detect Zika virus and to be multiplexed with other assays for detection (see FIG. 3).

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Nucleic Acid Extraction and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen) and quantified with the PicoGreen assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific). RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen) and quantified with the RiboGreen assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific). DNA and RNA quality and integrity were characterized using a Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies) and Fragment Analyzer (Advanced Analytics). Samples were then prepared for WES of tumor and normal DNA, as well as whole-transcriptome sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

siRNA Delivery via Lipid Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ON-TARGETplus Non-targeting Control Pool or ON-TARGETplus SMARTPool siRNAs targeting mouse Tlr4, Nr1h3, Nr1h2, Eif2ak3, or Ero1l were purchased from Horizon Discovery Ltd. (Cambridge, UK). All siRNAs were packaged in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) and transfected into cells. Cultured cells were transfected with siRNA for 24 h and then treated with cholesterol or 7-KC 12 h after transfection was completed. siRNA-loaded LNPs were formulated as previously described53 (link). Briefly, 400 μL of lipid solution containing 1.875 mM ssPalmO-Phe (Product# COATSOME® SS-OP, NOF CORPORATION, Tokyo, Japan), 450 μM polyethylene glycol-dimyristoylglycerol (Product# SUNBRIGHT® GM-020, NOF CORPORATION), and 1.875 mM cholesterol (Sigma–Aldrich) in ethanol was prepared. Then, 10 μg of siRNA in 124 μL of 20 mM malic acid buffer (pH 3.0) was gradually added to the lipid solution under vigorous mixing. The mixed solution was diluted with 1 mL of malic acid buffer and then mixed vigorously with 3 mL of PBS. This diluted solution was subjected to ultrafiltration with Amicon Ultra-4 (Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA) two or more times. The encapsulation efficiency and recovery ratio of siRNA in this LNP solution were measured with a RiboGreen assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) as previously described54 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Tissue Collection and Nucleic Acid Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For cohort 1 (cases 01–12), tissue samples were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen at the time of surgery and stored at −80 °C. Tumor and matched normal (from peripheral blood or non-neoplastic tissue) DNA and tumor RNA were extracted using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Venlo, the Netherlands) and the RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen), respectively. For cohort 2 (cases 13–40), FFPE tumor tissue was sectioned and stored at room temperature. DNA and RNA were extracted using the QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit (Qiagen) and the RNeasy FFPE kit (Qiagen), respectively. DNA was quantified with Nanodrop 8000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and the PicoGreen assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific). RNA was quantified with the RiboGreen assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative RT-PCR for DENV-2 Viral Load

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The RT–qPCR was performed in a 25 μl volume containing 6.25 μl of 4X TaqMan Fast Virus 1-Step Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 0.5 μl of 20 μM forward and reverse primers, 0.5 μl of 20 μM probes, 5 μl of viral RNA being tested, and 12.5 μl RNAse-free water using the QuantStudioTM 7 Flex System (Applied Biosciences). The primers (D2-1929, cD2-2116) and probe (D2-2000VIC-MBG/NFQ quencher) anneal at envelope (E) gene of the DENV-2 and their sequences have been reported previously [10 (link), 14 (link)]. The viral copy number was determined using a standard curve generated by an in-vitro transcribed DENV-2 RNA as previously described [10 (link)]. The concentration of standard RNA was determined based on the Certificate of Analysis received from Pharmaceutical Product Development, a global contract research organization. Briefly, a high concentration stock of DENV-2 RNA transcript obtained from CDC was tested by droplet digital PCR and was further diluted and quantified by RT–qPCR against standards previously measured by Ribogreen assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to make stocks at 2.7 × 107 copies/μl. The stock was 10-fold serially diluted to generate the standard curve in the RT–qPCR to measure the concentration of the samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!