The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

17 protocols using pmirglo luciferase reporter plasmid

1

Cloning and Validation of Gene Regulatory Regions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The coding sequence of Nkx3-1, Wee1 and Fox2 P and their respective 3′-UTR regions were amplified by PCR using Pfu and Taq polymerase mix (Promega) from mouse cDNA derived from wild type mouse tissue. The primers details are given in Supplemental Table 1. The coding regions were cloned directly into the pEF-TOPO expression plasmid (Life Technologies), and verified by sequencing. The 3′-UTR regions were cloned into the pmiR-Glo luciferase reporter plasmid (Promega) at the Sac1/Sal1 site of the MCS downstream of the firefly gene luc2. For the cloning of miR binding sites we followed the Promega protocol and ligated duplex oligos containing the 22 bp miR binding site, an internal Not1 restriction site and 3′Pme and 5′Xba1 restriction sites.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Validating the Regulation of IGF-1R by miR-944

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org/), miRDB (http://mirdb.org/) and MiRanda (http://www.microrna.org) were used for target prediction.
A fragment of the IGF-1R 3′-UTR, containing the wild-type (wt) miR-944 target site, was amplified by Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd. The binding sequences in the 3′-UTR of IGF-1R were mutated, and the IGF-1R 3′-UTR wt and mutant (mut) fragments were inserted into the pmirGLO luciferase reporter plasmid (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Cells were plated in triplicate in 24-well plates and allowed to settle for 12 h. The chemically synthesized luciferase reporter plasmids, along with miR-944 mimics or miR-944 inhibitor, were co-transected into cells, according to the Lipofectamine™ 2000 reagent protocol. Luciferase activity was detected 48 h post-transfection using a Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega). Renilla luciferase activity was used for normalization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Validating CSE1L 3' UTR miR-451a Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To further verify whether the 3′ untranslated region (3΄ UTR) of CSE1L mRNA contained the miR-451a binding site, we inserted fragments of the wild-type 3′ UTR and mutant 3′ UTR regions into the pmirGLO luciferase reporter plasmid (Promega, USA). Subsequently, we cloned these fragments and obtained pmirGLO-CSE1L3′-UTR-WT (WT) and pmirGLO-CSE1L3′-UTR-MUT (MUT). Next, 1 × 105 cells were co-transfected with the WT or MUT vectors and with the synthetic miR-451a mimic or NC. At 48 h post-transfection, cells were lysed, and luminescent signals were detected using a Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay kit (Promega, USA). Relative luciferase activity was presented as firefly luciferase/Renilla luciferase [30 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cloning and Mutagenesis of miR-324 Target 3′UTRs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fragments of the 3′UTR regions of putative miR-324 targets were amplified from cDNA, which was reverse transcribed from RNA extracted from C3H10T1/2 cells. PCR primers (Supplementary Table S4) were designed for In-Fusion HD cloning (Takara Bio Inc.) into the pmiRGLO luciferase reporter plasmid (Promega Corporation), which was digested with XhoI restriction endonuclease (New England Biolabs (UK) Ltd.). All predicted miR-324 binding sites were included in the amplified regions. Mutant Suox 3′UTR was synthesised as a gBlock (Integrated DNA Technologies), again designed for In-Fusion HD cloning. Mutant Cd300lf (at both predicted miR-324-5p binding sites) was produced by site-directed mutagenesis of the pmiRGLO-Cd300lf plasmid, using QuikChange Lightning (Agilent Technologies; mutagenesis sites shown in lower case; site 1 forward primer: 5′-AGGCAGGCTGCTTCAGGcAgGCTGTGTAAATCGTATC-3′; site 1 reverse primer: 5′-GATACGATTTACACAGCcTgCCTGAAGCAGCCTGCCT-3′; site 2 forward primer: 5′-AGCAGAAGGTGGAGGcAgGCAGAAGGAGTCAGG-3′; site 2 reverse primer: 5′-CCTGACTCCTTCTGCcTgCCTCCACCTTCTGCT-3′). Both mutant constructs contained mutations of 2 nucleotides within the predicted miR-324 binding sites. For all 3′UTR constructs except mutant Cd300lf, In-Fusion HD cloning was used, following the manufacturer’s protocol. All constructs underwent confirmation by Sanger sequencing (Source BioScience).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Investigating miR-144-3p Binding to PTEN

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mature sequences of miR-144-3p, located at chr17:28861533-28861618 (-), were obtained from miRBase2. The putative target genes for miR-144-3p were predicted and overlapped by three algorithms: TargetScan3 (v7.0), miRanda4 (v3.3a), and RNAhybrid5 (v2.1.2). To generate the reporter vectors containing the potential binding sites of miR-144-3p, the DNA fragments of the 3′UTR of target gene PTEN (NCBI Accession Gene ID: 5728), were amplified from the extracted DNA of HCFs and then cloned into the pmirGLO luciferase reporter plasmid (Promega, United States). Two constructs of pmirGLO luciferase reporter plasmid were generated: MUT-PTEN (with mutation of part of miR-144-3p binding site sequence) and WT-PTEN (containing the wild-type miR-144-3p binding site sequence). 500 ng of the pmirGLO luciferase reporter plasmid and appropriate miRNA plasmid were co-transfected with lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, United States) into HCFs. 24 h after transfection, the luciferase expression was determined using the Dual-GloTM Luciferase Reporter Assay Kit (Promega, United States) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The pRL-TK vector (Promega, United States) containing Renilla luciferase was also co-transfected for normalization in all relevant experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Luciferase Assay for miR-520f-3p Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The WEE2-AS1 wild-type (wt) fragments carrying miR-520f-3p binding sequences and mutant (mut) WEE2-AS1 fragments were cloned into the pmirGLO luciferase reporter plasmid (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) to generate WEE2-AS1-wt and WEE2-AS1-mut luciferase reporter vectors, respectively. The SP1-wt and SP1-mut reporter plasmids were designed and synthesized via the same experimental procedures. GBM cells were transfected with wt or mut reporter plasmids together with miR-520f-3p mimic or NC mimic using Lipofectamine® 2000. Forty-eight hours later, the collected transfected cells were assayed using a Dual-Luciferase® Reporter Assay System (Promega) for the measurement of luciferase activity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Validation of miR-431-5p Binding to PRDX1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PRDX1 sequences containing wild-type (WT-Type) or mutated (MUT-Type) miR-431-5p binding sites were synthesized and inserted into pmiR-GLO luciferase reporter plasmid (Promega, WI, USA), respectively. LoVo cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). PRDX1-WT or PRDX1-MUT were co-transfected with miR-431-5p-mimic or NC-mimic, respectively. After 24-h transfection, the luciferase activity was detected by the Glomax20/20 luminometer (Promega).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cloning and Evaluating FOXO1 3' UTR Regulatory Elements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The wild type and mutant sequence of 3′ UTR of FOXO1 were cloned into the pmirGLO luciferase reporter plasmid (Promega) and sequenced to confirm the resulting plasmid by GenScript Biotech. hESCs were cultured in 24-well plates and transfected with the indicated plasmids. Cells were harvested, and the luciferase activities were analyzed after 48 h using a Dual-Luciferase Assay System (Promega) with a luminescence counter (Berthold Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For normalization according to the transfection efficiency, firefly luciferase activity was normalized to the corresponding Renilla luciferase activity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Regulation of IL-10 by miR-21 in Tregs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse IL-10 3’-untranslated region (3’UTR) (+1 to +702) containing the miR-21-5p binding site was inserted into the NheI/XbaI site downstream of the luc2 gene of pmirGLO luciferase reporter plasmid (Promega, Madison, USA). Control and miR-21-5p agomir were purchased from Ruibo (Guangzhou, China). For dual-luciferase assay, CD4+CD8-YFP+ Treg cells from the spleen of WT and Foxp3Cre-YFPmiR-21f/f mouse were flow sorted and transfected with mouse IL-10 3’UTR reporter plasmid alone or in combination with miR-21-5p agomir using Nucleofector Kit for mouse T cells (Lonza, Switzerland) per manufacturer’s instructions. Transfected cells were then cultured in the presence of 2 μg/ml anti-CD3, 2 μg/ml anti-CD28, 500 IU/ml IL-2, and 10 ng/mL TGF-β. After 48 h, the luciferase activities of the whole-cell lysate were analyzed using a dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega, USA). Data were normalized for transfection efficiency by dividing firefly luciferase activity by that of the Renilla luciferase.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Luciferase Assay for CACNA1H 3'UTR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The wild-type or mutated 3′-untranslated region (UTR) of CACNA1H was cloned into the pmirGLO luciferase reporter plasmid (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and named wt-CACNA1H-3′UTR or mut-CACNA1H-3′UTR. The mutated sites are shown in Figure 1(a). The wt-CACNA1H-3′UTR or mut-CACNA1H-3′UTR was cotransfected into HEK293T cells with negative control (NC) mimic or miR-25-3p mimic. After 24 h, the luciferase activity was detected by using the dual-luciferase detection kit according to the manufacturer's instruction (KeyGEN, Nanjing, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!