The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

24 protocols using cd3 clone 17a2

1

Multiparametric Immune Phenotyping of Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single cell suspensions were treated with Zombie violet as per the manufacturers insert instructions (Biolegend). Following treatment with Fc block (1 μg/ml) (Biolegend), cells were stained with combinations of the following antibodies: CD69 (clone H1.2F3), CD44 (clone IM7), CD8α (clone 53–6.7), CD3e (clone 145– 2C11), CD3 (clone 17A2), CD11a (clone I21/7), CD45 (clone 30-F11), Thy1.2 (clone 53–2.1), CD4 (clone GK1.5), CD4 (clone RM 4–4), CD4 (clone RM 4–5), CD62L (clone MEL-14) (BioLegend). Intracellular cytokine staining was performed with anti-IFN-γ (clone XMG1.2) and anti-IL17A (clone TC11–18H10.1) antibodies (BioLegend). Data was acquired using a FACS Canto II flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson (BD)) or Attune NxT flow cytometer (ThermoFischer Scientific) and analyzed using FlowJo software (TreeStar, version 10). All gating stragies used are described in the supplementary data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Panel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CD3 clone 17A2 (BioLegend 100237 and 100244), CD4 clone RM4–5 (BioLegend 100545 and 100510), CD4 clone GK13 (BioLegend 100403), CD8 clone 53–6.7 (BioLegend 100734), CD11b clone M1/70 (BioLegend 101257), CD11c clone N418 (BioLegend 117339 and 117338), CD19 clone 6D5 (BioLegend 115522), CD24 clone M1/69 (BioLegend 101822), CD45 clone 30-F11 (BioLegend 103139, 103132, and 103114; eBioscience 56–0451-82), CD45R clone RA3–6B2 (BioLegend 103247, 103246, and 103226), CD69 clone H1.2F3 (eBioscience 25–0691-81), CD90.2 clone 30-H12 (BioLegend 105331), CD103 clone 2E7 (BioLegend 121406 and 121414), F4/80 clone BM8 (BioLegend 123108), Flt3L (R&D Systems AF427), Ly6C clone HK1.4 (BioLegend 128037), Ly6G clone 1A8 (BioLegend 127645), MHC-II clone M5/114.15.2 (BioLegend 707631), NK1.1 clone PK136 (BioLegend 108707, 108720, and 108749), Streptavidin-Brilliant Violet 650 (BioLegend 405231), Streptavidin-APC (eBioscience 17–4317-82). Depleting antibodies: NK1.1 clone PK136 (BioXCell BE0036), and IgG2a isotype control (BioXCell BE0085).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immune Cell Profiling in Murine Super-Infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole blood was collected from mice on days −1, 3, 7 and 9 post‐super‐infection. Blood was collected in 0.5 M EDTA, then lysed using ACK Lysis buffer, washed and resuspended in flow cytometry buffer (2% FCS + 0.5 mM EDTA in PBS). Single‐cell suspensions were blocked with anti‐CD16/32 antibody and stained with fluorochrome‐conjugated antibodies against mouse CD3 (clone 17A2; Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA), CD4 (clone GK1.5, Biolegend), CD8 (clone 53‐6.2, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), CD45 (clone 30‐F11, BD Biosciences), CD11b (clone M1/70, BD Biosciences), IA/IE (M5/114; eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), Ly6G (clone 1A8, BD Biosciences), CD62L (clone MEL‐14, BD Biosciences) and CD69 (clone H1.2F3, BD Biosciences), and dead cells were excluded using LIVE/DEAD Near‐Infrared viability dye (#L110909, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Sphero™ Blank Calibration Particles (BD Biosciences) were added to the samples and used as reference counting beads. Cells were acquired on a BD LSR II Fortessa Cell Analyser, and data were analysed using FlowJo software (v10.6; Treestar, Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Treg Suppression of CD4+ T Cell Proliferation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
10-week old female BALB/c, NZM, and iNZM mice were treated with/without UVB for 5 consecutive days. The dLNs were processed into a single cell suspension, as described in flow cytometry. CD4+CD25+ TReg cells and CD4+ T cells were isolated via CD4+ CD25+ Regulatory T Cell Isolation Kit and CD4+ T Cell Isolation Kit, respectively (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergish Gladbach, Germany). TReg cells were labeled with CFSE (ThermoFisher, Eugene, Oregon) and CD4+ cells were labeled with cell proliferation dye 670 (ThermoFisher). Following labeling, the cells were co-incubated at a ratio of 0:1,1:1,1:2,1:4 (TReg: TEffector) with/without anti-CD3/CD28 beads (ThermoFisher) for 72 hrs in a 96-well plate. Cells were then stained, as described in the flow cytometry section, for CD3 clone: 17A2 (BioLegend) for 45 minutes, followed by staining with live/dead cell dye (ThermoFisher) for 30 minutes. After staining, cells were resuspended in PBS and data collected on a BD LSR II flow cytometer and analyzed using FlowJo. For analysis, samples were gated on CFSE negative cells to exclude TRegs, followed by live cell gating, then CD3+ cells and lastly proliferation dye 670 to examine percent proliferation of CD4+ T cells (Supplementary figure 1). Percentage proliferation was calculated using the formula: (100 × 1:1,1:2, or 1:4, samples) /0:1 sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Isolation and Characterization of Murine Hematopoietic Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BM was harvested from femurs, tibias, and ilia, and cells were enriched using anti-CD117 magnetic beads (Miltenyi). The c-kit+ fraction was stained with antibodies against CD117 (c-kit APC, clone 2B8, Biolegend, dilution 1/100), Sca-1 (APC-Cy7, clone D7, Biolegend, 1/100), CD135 (Flt3 PE-Cy5, clone A2F10, Life technologies, 1/50), CD150 (Slam Pecy7, clone TC15-12F12.2, Biolegend, 1/100), CD48 (Pacific Blue, HM48-1, Biolegend, 1/100), CD16/32 (PercPCy5.5, clone M1/702.4G2, eBioscienceBD Bioscience, 1/100), CD34 (Alexa 700, 1/100), and a lineage cocktail (PE, CD3ε clone 145-2C11; Ly-6G/Ly-6C clone RB6-8C5; CD11b clone M1/70; CD45R/B220 clone RA3-6B2; TER-119, Biolegend, 1/200). The c-kit fraction was stained with antibodies against CD11b (PercPCy5.5, clone M1/70, eBioscience, 1/100), Ly6C (APC, HK1.4, Thermofisher, 1/200), Ly6G (BV510, RUO, Biolegend, 1/100), Siglec F (PE CF594, RUO, BD 1/100), F4/80 (alexa 700, clone BM8, Ozyme, 1/100), in addition to a lineage cocktail in PeCy7 (B220 clone RA3-6B2 Biolegend, CD3, clone 17A2 Biolegend, CD11c clone N418, eBioscience, NK1.1 clone PK136 Biolegend, Ter119 clone TER-119 BD Biosciences) and DAPI (1/1000) as live/dead marker. All cells were analyzed on a Ze5 (Bio-Rad) plate-reader cytometers. Data analysis was performed using FlowJo v10.2 software (TreeStar) and Prism v9.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Immune Cell Phenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies were used for staining sections for imaging or isolated cells for flow cytometry: collagen-IV (rabbit polyclonal; Abcam), gp38 (clone 8.1.1; eBioscience), PNAd (clone Meca-79; BD Biosciences), ER-TR7 (clone sc-73355; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), CD11c (clone N418 or HL3; BioLegend), Lyve1 (clone Aly7; eBioscience), SIRPa (clone P84; BD Biosciences), CD11b (clone 5C6; AbD Serotec; clone M1/70; BioLegend), Y-Ae (clone eBioY-Ae; eBioscience), CD45.2 (clone 104; BioLegend), MHC II (clone M5/114.15.2; BioLegend), CD205 (clone NLDC-145; BioLegend), CD207 (clone 929F3.01; Dendritics), CD3 (clone 17A2; BioLegend), CD69 (clone H1.2F3; BioLegend), CD62L (clone Mel-14; BD Biosciences), CD8 (clone 53-6.7; BioLegend), IFNγ (clone XMG1.2; eBiosciences), CD127 (clone A7R34; BioLegend), and KLRG1 (clone 2F1; eBiosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Analysis of CD3+ and F4/80+ Cells in Brain Cryosections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissues were obtained from some of the animals previously used for intravital microscopy. Cryosections of 5 μm of the brain encephalic region were obtained and fixed with ice-cold acetone (Merck, Rahway, NJ, USA) for 10 min. The blockage of non-specific binding was made using a goat serum (Vector Laboratories, Newark, NJ, USA) for 20 min. F4/80 clone BM8 and CD3 clone 17A2 (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) were used in the analysis and were incubated overnight after dilution on PBST. The ImmPRESS® HRP Goat Anti-Rat IgG Polymer Detection Kit with DAB (Dako, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used to detect the antibodies. The counterstain used was Harris’s Hematoxylin Solution (EasyPath-São Paulo, Brazil) for 1 min. The slides were rinsed with tap water and then dehydrated chemically and mounted with Erv-mount mounting media (EasyPath). The counting of CD3+ and F4/80+ cells was performed manually. Representative images were acquired in Motic Panthera L Microscope Built-in Smart CAM & ImagingOnDevice System (Motic-Xiamen, Xiamen, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Analyzing Germinal Center Responses to Adjuvanted Vaccines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were s.c. immunized with alum-adsorbed NP–OVA (50 µg) and TLR7–alum or TLR7-NP (equivalent gardiquimod dose, 20 µg) in 100 µl PBS at tail base. Inguinal dLNs were excised at day 4, day 7, day 14 and day 22 to prepare single-cell suspensions. For flow cytometry analysis of GC B cells, follicular T cells (TFH) and plasmablasts, cells from the dLNs were stained with Ghost Dye Violet 510 (Tonbo Biosciences). Cells were then washed and blocked with Fc-blocker (clone 2.4G2, BD Bioscience) prior to staining with markers, including CD19 (clone 1D3/CD19, Biolegend), CD38 (clone 90, BD Biosciences), CD95 (clone Jo2, BD Biosciences), CD138 (clone 281-2, BD Biosciences), CD44 (clone IM7, BioLegend), CD3 (clone 17A2, BioLegend), CD4 (clone GK1.5, BioLegend), CXCR5 (clone L138D7, BioLegend) and PD1 (clone 29F.1A12, BioLegend). After staining, cells were washed and fixed with 1.5% PFA. Stained cells were collected using BD FACS Diva v8.01 software associated with a BD LSRII flow cytometer. Data were analysed with FlowJo 10 software. The gating strategy consisted of gating GCBC on live single CD3CD19+CD95+CD38 cells, TFH on live single CD19CD3+CD4+CXCR5+PD1hi, and plasmablasts on live single CD138+CD44+ cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Isolation of Brain Mononuclear Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were perfused intracardially with PBS before the brain dissection and homogenization. Brain mononuclear cells (BMCs) were isolated using 37–70% (v/v) Percoll gradients. Three weeks after the peak of the disease, EAE BMCs were separated by magnetic microbeads in a two-step procedure: positive selection of memory CD19+ cells (mCD19+) (Memory B Cell Isolation Kit, Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) followed by negative selection of CD3+ cells from the remaining unlabeled cells (Pan T cell isolation kit II, Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). Four brain tissues were pooled for each experiment. BMC purity and phenotype were analyzed by LSRII flow cytometry (BD) using conjugated anti-B220 (clone RA3-6B2, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), TCR-β (clone H57-597, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), CD3 (clone 17A2, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), CD19 (clone 1D3, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), and appropriate isotype control monoclonal antibodies (mAbs).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Splenic T Cell Activation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Splenic CD4+ or CD8+ T cells were isolated from 8-week-old B6 mice or PD-1 KO mice. Tissue was harvested, mechanically disrupted and filtered through a 70uM cell strainer. Red blood cells were lysed using Red Blood Cell lysis buffer (Sigma). Cells were stained with surface markers for CD3 (clone 17A2, BioLegend), CD4 (clone GK1.5, BioLegend) and CD8a (clone 53-6.7, BioLegend) for sorting using a BD FACSAria III (BDBiosciences). 100,000 cells were seeded in 96 round u-wells and treated with CD3/28 Dynabeads Mouse T-activator (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in the presence or absence of WT NETs or PD-L1 KO NETs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!