The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Methanol solvent a

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

Methanol (solvent A) is a clear, volatile, and flammable liquid commonly used as a solvent in various laboratory applications. It has a low boiling point and a high solvency power, making it useful for dissolving a wide range of organic compounds. Methanol is a versatile solvent that can be used for tasks such as extraction, cleaning, and sample preparation in analytical chemistry and related fields.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using methanol solvent a

1

Phenolic Profiling of OA Extract

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phenolic profiles of OA extract consisting of cyanidin-3-glucoside (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), gallic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), and quercetin-3-O-rutinoside (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Chromatography was performed by using a Waters® system equipped with a Waters® 2998 photodiode array detector. Chromatographic separation was performed using Purospher® STAR, C-18 encapped (5 μm), LiChroCART® 250-4.6, and HPLC-Cartridge, Sorbet Lot no. HX255346 (Merck, Germany). The mobile phase (HPLC grade) consisted of 100% methanol (solvent A) (Fisher Scientific, USA) and 2.5% acetic acid (solvent B) (Fisher Scientific, USA) in deionized (DI) water was used to induce gradient elution. The gradient elution was carried out at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min with the following gradient: 0-17 min, 70% A; 18-20 min, 100% A; and 20.5-25 min, 10% A. The sample was filtered (0.45 μm, Millipore), and a direct injection of the tested sample at the volume of 20 μl on the column was performed. The chromatograms were recorded at 280 nm using the UV detector, and data analysis was performed using Empower™ 3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

HPLC Analysis of Phytochemical Fingerprint

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis was used to determine the fingerprint chromatogram. Chromatography was performed by using a Waters® system equipped with a Waters® 2998 photodiode array detector. Chromatographic separation was performed using a Purospher® STAR, C-18 encapped column (5 μm) and LiChroCART® 250-4.6 HPLC cartridge, Sorbet Lot No. HX255346 (Merck, Germany). The mobile phase (HPLC-grade) consisted of 100% methanol (solvent A) (Fisher Scientific, USA), and 2.5% acetic acid (solvent B) (Fisher Scientific, USA) in deionized (DI) water was used to induce gradient elution. The gradient elution was carried out at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min with the following gradient: 0-17 min, 70% A, 18-20 min, 100% A; 20.5-25 min, 10% A. The sample was filtered (0.45 μm, Millipore), and a direct injection of the tested sample at the volume of 20 μl on the column was performed. Chromatogram detection was performed at 280 nm using a UV detector, and data analysis was performed using EmpowerTM3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Phenolic Profile Analysis of Mulberry Extract

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phenolic profiles of mulberry extract and encapsulated mulberry extract consisting of cyanidin-3-glucoside (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), gallic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), and quercetin-3-O-rutinoside (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Chromatography was performed by using a Waters® system equipped with a Waters 2998 photodiode array detector. Chromatographic separation was performed using Purospher® STAR, C-18 encapped (5 μm), LiChroCART® 250-4.6, and HPLC-Cartridge, Sorbet Lot number HX255346 (Merk, Germany). The mobile phase (HPLC grade) consisted of 100% methanol (solvent A) (Fisher Scientific, USA) and 2.5% acetic acid (solvent B) (Fisher Scientific, USA) in deionized (DI) water was used to induce gradient elution. The gradient elution was carried out at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min with the following gradient: 0–17 min, 70% A; 18–20 min, 100% A; and 20.5–25 min, 10% A. The sample was filtered (0.45 μm, Millipore), and a direct injection of tested sample at the volume of 20 μl on the column was performed. The chromatograms were recorded at 280 nm using UV detector, and data analysis was performed using EmpowerTM3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HPLC Fingerprint Analysis of AZC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fingerprint chromatogram of AZC was established through high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) employing a Waters® system equipped with a Waters® 2998 photodiode array detector. Separation was achieved using Purospher® STAR, C-18 encapped (5µM), LiChro-CART® 250 − 4.6, and HPLC-Cartridge, Sorbet Lot No. HX255346 (Merck, Germany).
In this study, the mobile phase gradient comprised 100% methanol (solvent A) (Fisher Scientific, USA) and 2.5% acetic acid (solvent B) (Fisher Scientific, USA) in deionized (DI) water. The gradient elution was conducted at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min, with the following gradient profile: 0–17 min, 70% A; 18–20 min, 100% A; 20.5–25 min, 10% A. Before administration, the sample underwent filtration (0.45 μm, Millipore), and a 20 µL aliquot of the sample was directly utilized. The chromatogram was assessed at 280 nm using a UV detector, and data analysis was carried out employing EmpowerTM3 [22 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fingerprint Analysis of PMG using HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fingerprint chromatogram of PMG was determined by using the high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. Chromatography was performed by using a Waters® system equipped with a Waters® 2998 photodiode array detector. The separation of chromatogram was performed using Purospher® STAR, C-18 encapped (5 μm), LiChroCART® 250-4.6, and HPLC-Cartridge, Sorbet Lot No. HX255346 (Merck, Germany). According to this study, 100% methanol (solvent A) (Fisher Scientific, USA) and 2.5% acetic acid (solvent B) (Fisher Scientific, USA) in deionized (DI) water were used to produce the gradient of mobile phase. The gradient elution of mobile phase was carried out at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min with the following gradient: 0-17 min, 70% A, 18-20 min, 100% A; 20.5-25 min, 10% A. The sample was filtered (0.45 μm, Millipore) and an aliquot of sample at the volume of 20 μl was directly administered. The chromatogram assessment was performed at 280 nm using a UV detector, and data analysis was performed using EmpowerTM3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!