The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

18 protocols using cd105 fitc

1

Characterization of RCC Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CD105-FITC (BioLegend, California, USA) and CD133-APC (Miltenyi Biotec GmbH, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) antibodies were used for all flow cytometry experiments. RCC cell lines were cultured as previously mentioned and washed with PBS prior to harvesting. RCC cells were harvested using Accutase cell detachment solution. FACSCalibur (BD biosciences, California, USA) was used for simple cell acquisition and analyzing samples to establish target protein markers in RCC cell lines. FACSAriaII (BD biosciences, California, USA) was used for cell sorting. Ten thousand cells were acquired for flow cytometry (FACSCalibur) before analysis. Flow cytometry data analysis, dot plots, and histograms were prepared using FCS Express 5.1 (DeNovo software, California, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Stem Cell Immunophenotyping by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 3rd generation of stem cells was harvested, and washed once with phosphate-buffered saline(PBS). Cells (1 × 105 per sample) were stained with the following mouse anti-human monoclonal antibody at room temperature for 30 min: anti-CD44-FITC, -CD105-FITC, -CD29-PE, -CD34-PE (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA), isotype-identical antibody (Biolegend) served as controls. The cells were washed with PBS two times, and then resuspended in PBS. Fluorescent labeling was analyzed by flow cytometric analysis and CellQuest Pro software (BD Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

ECFC and MSC Immunophenotyping Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ECFC single-cell suspension was generated by detaching cells with TrypLE™ Express Enzyme (Gibco, USA) and resuspended to a concentration of 1 × 107 cells/ml. Samples were incubated, respectively, with anti-human CD31-FITC (eBioscience, USA), VEGFR2/KDR-PE (R&D, USA), CD144-FITC (Abcam, UK), CD34-PE (Biolegend, USA), CD45-FITC (Biolegend, USA), and CD14-FITC (eBioscience, USA). MSCs were resuspended to a concentration of 1 × 106 cells/ml and incubated, respectively, with anti-human CD29-PE (Biolegend, USA), CD90-PE (Biolegend, USA), CD14-FITC (Biolegend, USA), CD19-PE (Biolegend, USA), CD73-FITC (Biolegend, USA), CD105-FITC (Biolegend, USA), HLA-DR-PE (Biolegend, USA), CD34-PE (Biolegend, USA), CD45-FITC (Biolegend, USA), and CD31-FITC (eBiosciences, USA). 5 μl antibody solution was added into 100 μl cell suspension and incubated for 30 minutes at 4°C in the dark; 400 μl of PBS was added and cells were analyzed with FACSAria I (Becton Dickinson, USA) or Accuri C6 (Becton Dickinson, USA) and Becton Dickinson CELLQuest software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantification of Stem Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were cultured in 6-well plates as described above. After 72 h culture, cells with approximately 80% confluence were collected with Accutase (BDSciences, San Diego, CA, USA) and analyzed for CD105 and CD133 marker expressions. Cells were stained with (i) CD105-PE (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA, clone 266) plus CD133/1-APC (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany, clone AC133); or (ii) CD105-FITC (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA, clone 43A3) plus CD133/2-APC (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany, clone 293C3) according to the manufacturers’ protocols with the appropriate isotype controls. Subsequently, the samples were acquired in a FACSCalibur system. For each measurement, at least 10,000 cells were acquired. Data were analyzed by Flowing Software (Turku Centre for Biotechnology, Turku, Finland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Cell Surface Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were detached with Accutase (Sigma-Aldrich; 5 min at 37 °C) and then incubated with the following mouse anti-human mAbs for 30 min on ice: CD73-Pacific Blue™, CD90-FITC, CD105-FITC, CD166-PE, CD34-APC, CD45-PerCP, CD117-PE (all from BioLegend) and CD133-APC (Miltenyi Biotec). After two washing steps (PBS with 2 % FBS), the sample tubes were acquired on a BD FACSAria III (BD Biosciences) and at least 10.000 events were recorded. Data were analyzed with BD FACSDiva and FlowJo V10 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multimarker Characterization of Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were labeled for 40 minutes at 4°C with the following antibodies: CD146-APC (1 : 100, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA); NG2-PE (1 : 100, R&D Systems); PDGFRβ-PE (1 : 100, R&D Systems); CD31-FITC (1 : 100, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA); CD45-APC (1 : 100, BioLegend); CD105-FITC (1 : 100, BioLegend); CD90-PE (1 : 100, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA); and CD73-PE (1 : 100, BioLegend). Analyses were performed using Guava EasyCyte 5HT™ Flow Cytometer and GuavaSoft 2.1 software (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Phenotypic Characterization of MSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Approximately 105 MSCs were incubated with 10 μl monoclonal antibody conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) or phycoerythrin (PE): CD105-FITC (Biolegend, ImTec, Antwerpen, Belgium), CD90-PE (Biolegend), CD73-PE (Biolegend) and CD166-PE (Biolegend). Unbound antibody was washed after 15 min with 3 ml PBS (Gibco). The cell pellet was resuspended in 0.5 ml PBS (Gibco). Samples were analyzed with the flow cytometer Macs Quant (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) with 10,000 events recorded for each condition. The morphology of cultured cells was evaluated using light microscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Analysis of Cell Phenotypes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell surface antigens on cells were evaluated with FACS. The cells were dissociated with 0.05% trypsin/EDTA (Highclone), washed with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with Triton X‐100, and blocked with a BSA mixture. The samples were then stained with antibodies against human octamer‐binding transcription factor 4 (OCT4; R&D systems, 1:200), stage specific embryonic antigen 1 (SSEA1; R&D systems, 1:200), cluster of differentiation 31 (CD31‐FITC; Miltenyi Biotec, 1:100), CD34 (CD34‐PerCP, BioLegend, 1:100), human leukocyte antigen ‐ DR isotype (HLA‐DR, HLA‐DR‐APC, BioLegend, 1:100), CD73 (CD73‐PE, BioLegend, 1:100), CD90 (CD90‐APC, BioLegend, 1:200), CD105 (CD105‐FITC, BioLegend, 1:150), integrin α5 (Santa Cruz, 1:200), integrin α11 (Abcam, 1:200), integrin β1(Abcam, 1:200), and integrin β5 (BioLegend, 1:200) for 30 min or 1 h at 4 °C. Samples were subsequently stained with fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor‐488 or 594 conjugated goat antirabbit (Abcam, 1:400), Alexa Fluor‐488 or 594 conjugated goat antimouse (Abcam, 1:400)) for 30 min at 4 °C. The corresponding mouse/rabbit isotype antibodies (Abcam, 1:200) were used as controls. Cell immunotypes were determined with the Accuri C6 flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and the percentage of expressed cell surface antigens was calculated for 10 000 gated‐cell events.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of Ex Vivo Expanded BM-MSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ex vivo expanded BM-MSCs were characterized for expressing MSC official markers by flow cytometry and their ability to differentiate into mesodermal cell types, as indicated by the International Society for Cellular Therapy. In detail, BM-MSCs were trypsinized, washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) + 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS), and stained with the following antibodies for 15 min at room temperature: CD105 FITC, CD73 PE, CD90 PE, CD146 PB, CD45 FITC, CD31 FITC (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). After washing twice in PBS + 2% FBS, cells were analyzed using the BD FACSCantoTM (BD Life Sciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Data were analyzed using FlowJo™ v10.8 Software (BD Life Sciences, Ashland, OR, USA) and represented as a percentage of positive cells on total cells.
BM-MSCs were induced to differentiate into osteoblasts and adipocytes using the proper differentiation medium for human cells (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch-Gladbach, Germany). After 14 days, adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation was evaluated by Oil Red O (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and Alizarin Red staining (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples from four women were used in this step. The cells were evaluated according to the criteria for characterization of MSCs33 (link). Regarding adhesion to polystyrene and formation of fibroblast-like forming colonies, immunophenotypic15 characterization was done by flow cytometry by labeling the cells with the following antibodies: CD73-PECy7, CD90-FITC, CD105- FITC, CD19-PE Cy7, CD34-APC Cy7, CD45-APC, HLA-DR-PERCP Cy5.5, CD44-PERCP Cy5.5, CD49c-PE, CD151-APC, CD166-PE, CD117–APC, SSEA4-FITC, Oct4-PE (Biolegend, San Diego, CA), and NANOG-PERCP Cy5.5 (BD Pharmingen). The analysis was done in BD FACSCanto or BD FACSVerse and the results were analyzed using BD FACSDiva.
Analysis of differentiation into the three main mesenchymal lines was performed using adipogenesis, chondrogenesis, and osteogenesis StemPro differentiation kits (Gibco), according to the manufacturer's protocol. 0.5% oil Red O (Sigma-Aldrich), Alcian blue (Sigma-Aldrich), and Alizarin red (Sigma-Aldrich) were used respectively to observe adipogenesis, chondrogenesis, and osteogenesis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!