The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Microscan walkaway 96 plus system

Manufactured by Siemens
Sourced in Germany, United States

The MicroScan WalkAway 96 plus system is an automated microbiology instrument used for the identification and susceptibility testing of bacterial isolates. It is designed to automate various processes, including inoculation, incubation, and measurement, to streamline laboratory workflows.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

18 protocols using microscan walkaway 96 plus system

1

Screening for Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the time of admission, we cultured three series of samples for active surveillance. They included two rectal swabs for determining the colonization of VRE and CRE and a nasal swab to screen the colonization of MRSA. For VRE screening, rectal swabs were inoculated in EnterococcoselTM enrichment broth (Becton Dickinson, Oxford, UK) and plated onto a ChromIDTM VRE (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) agar plate. All morphologically distinct colonies were identified, and their antimicrobial susceptibility was tested by MicroScan WalkAway 96 plus system (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc, West Sacramento, CA, USA) following the manufacturer's recommendations. For screening CRE and MRSA, a ChomIDTM Carba (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) agar plate and a ChromIDTM MRSA (bioMérieux) agar plate were used, respectively. Colonies were tested in an automated system (MicroScan WalkAway 96 plus system, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc, West Sacramento, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Profiling Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MRAB 0227) strain was obtained from The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, and identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the multidrug-resistant bacteria was performed by an automated MicroScan® WalkAway 96 Plus system (Siemens Ltd., Germany). Standard strain A. baumannii CICC 22933 (AB 22933) was acquired from the China Centre for Industrial Culture Collection. Bacteria were grown in Luria Bertani (LB) medium at 37°C overnight.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Rapid Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood samples were cultured in BacT/Alert bottles (Sysmex bioMérieux, Kobe, Japan). Positive samples were rapidly identified, and antimicrobial susceptibility was tested using the MicroScan WalkAway 96 plus system (Siemens, Munich, Germany).9 (link),10 (link) All bacterial isolates were identified by analyzing colony morphology and Gram staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Identification of Clinical Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood cultures were incubated on the BacT/Alert system (bio Mérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) for five days. When growth was detected, the sample was subcultured, and an isolated colony was used in the subsequent processes. Identification of clinical isolates was performed as follows: from January 2005 to March 2010, manual techniques; a test for clumping factor (PS LATEX kit, Eiken, Tokyo, Japan) and biochemical properties (ID test SP-18, Nissui Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Japan); from March 2010 to December 2016, pos combo 3.1 J panels in the automated MicroScan WalkAway 96 plus system (Siemens, Berlin, Germany); and from January 2017, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Antibiotic susceptibilities were determined using the MicroScan WalkAway 96 plus system. Susceptibility of isolates was interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M100-S31 [17 ]. Oxacillin or cefoxitin susceptibilities were used to detect methicillin resistance according to the CLSI documents. Identification of S. lugdunensis isolates prior to January 2017 was reconfirmed by MALDI-TOF MS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Burn Patients' Bacterial Infection Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples from burn patients with bacterial infections were cultured in the standard media. Then, clinical isolates were identified using a MicroScan WalkAway 96 Plus System (Siemens, Germany) and a Microflex LT (Bruker Diagnostics Inc., USA) matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) system. All the eligible clinical data of burn patients were collected from medical records, including basic demographics (age, gender, length of hospitalization stay, etc.), burn characteristics (cause of burn, burn depth, TBSA, inhalation injury, etc.), underlying diseases (diabetes, hypertension, abnormal liver function, hypoproteinemia, etc.), clinical treatments (surgeries, blood transfusion, parenteral nutrition, antimicrobial treatment, urethral catheterization, deep artery puncture, duration of antimicrobial application, etc.), and laboratory records (white blood cell count [WBC], percentage of neutrophils [NEU%], hemoglobin [Hb], platelets [PLT], albumin-globulin ratio [A/G ratio]).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of CREC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing on CREC isolates was performed using the MicroScan WalkAway 96 Plus system (Siemens, Germany) and the microbroth dilution method, including Amikacin, Imipenem, Meropenem, Cefazolin, Cefuroxime, Ceftriaxone, Cefotaxime, Ceftazidime, Cefepime, Sulperazon, Ciprofloxacin, Levofloxacin, Tobramycin, Aztreonam, Ampicillin/sulbactam, Piperacillin/tazobactam, Cefoxitin, Tigecycline and Polymyxin B. The interpretation of the results followed the guidelines provided by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). For the interpretation of tigecycline susceptibility results, the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines were employed. Escherichia coli ATCC25922 was used as the control strain, obtained from the China National Health Inspection Center.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antimicrobial Resistance in P. aeruginosa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peptides were purchased from GL Biochemistry Inc. (Shanghai, China). The purity of peptides was ≥5%. Amino acid sequences and physical characteristics for peptides are shown in Supplementary Table S1. TRIzol reagent and Super ScriptTM III kits were purchased from TaKaRa Inc. (Dalian, China). Ceftazidime, piperacillin and levofloxacin were purchased from Solarbio Inc. (Beijing, China). C4-HSL standards is purchased from Sigma (Sigma, China). All other reagents were of analytical grade. The MDR P. aeruginosa (MRPA) strain 0108 (MRPA0108) was obtained from the Clinical Laboratory Department, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University. MRPA0108 exhibits resistance to gentamicin, kanamycin, ampicillin, cefepime, streptomycin, tetracycline, amoxicillin, and ciprofloxacin. Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of MRPA0108 were performed by an automated MicroScan WalkAway 96 Plus system (Siemens Ltd., Germany) at the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolation and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patient bloodstream samples at three time points (Table 1) were collected and cultured in the Emory Healthcare microbiology laboratory (under Institutional Review Board approval 50685). For clinical care of the patient, the S. aureus isolates were subjected to automated susceptibility testing using the MicroScan WalkAway 96 Plus system (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc., Tarrytown, NY), and vancomycin susceptibility was confirmed by Etest (bioMérieux, Inc., Durham, NC). The initial subculture plate was entirely swept using a plastic loop (after at least 48 h of incubation) and frozen at −80°C for DNA isolation in order to ensure the representation of isolate subpopulations for subsequent deep sequencing and analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Bacterial Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) and a MicroScan WalkAway 96 plus System (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Berkeley, CA, USA), respectively. The susceptibility results were interpreted based on the standard criteria defined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [32 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Identification and Characterization of ESBL-Producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This study was carried out at King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The study included 77 non-duplicate, consecutive, phenotypically confirmed E coli and K pneumoniae ESBL-producing isolates identified between January to June 2013. These isolates were from various specimen types including, blood, wound swabs, endotracheal secretions, sputum, body fluids, and urine, which were routinely cultured in the bacteriology laboratory. Identification of the organisms and susceptibility testing were carried out according to our laboratory policy by Vitek 2 (Biomerieux, Marcy l’Etoile) for blood and sterile body fluids samples and by MicroScan Walkaway 96 plus System (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostic Inc.) for other samples. We used MicroScan as a backup automated identification system in case the isolate was not identified or results were equivocal by Vitek 2. The isolates flagged as ESBL by Microscan or Vitek-2 were confirmed using the E-test method as recommended by CLSI. Only the first representative isolate per patient was included and all other repeat isolates were excluded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!