The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using gr 1 clone rb6 8c5

1

Isolation and Characterization of Microglia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were deeply anesthetized with a lethal dose of choral hydrate and transcardially perfused with 0.1 M PBS. Brain was removed and one forebrain hemisphere (without olfactory bulb) was minced, incubated in phenol-red free DMEM supplemented with 2% heat inactivated FBS, 10mM HEPES and Collagenase type IV (0.4 mg/mL) for 15 min and then passed through a 19G blunt syringe to obtain a homogeneous cell suspension. Mononuclear cells were separated with a 40% Percoll gradient. Isolated cells were surface stained in FACS buffer for 20–30 min on ice with the following antibodies: CD11b (clone M1/70, eBioscience), F4/80 (clone CI: A3-1, BioRad), CD45 (clone 30F11, eBioscience), MHC II (clone M5/114.15.2, eBioscience), CD3e (clone 145-2C11, Biolegend), Gr-1 (clone RB6–8C5, Biolegend), CD115 (clone AFS98, eBioscience). Multiparameter analysis was performed on a LSR II Fortessa (BD) and analyzed with FlowJo software (Tree Star) (Details are included in the Flow Cytometry Reporting Summary). Dead cells and doublets were excluded from all analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multicolor Flow Cytometry of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LL2 and MC38 cells were purchased from ATCC (Rockville, MD). Cells were cultured in vitro in RPMI-1640 media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 50 units/mL of penicillin/streptomycin, 2 mM of L-glutamine, 1 mM of sodium pyruvate, and 2 nM of non-essential amino acids, and grown at 37°C. For flow cytometric analyses, antibodies including CD11b (clone M1/70, Biolegend), Gr-1 (Clone RB6–8C5, Biolegend), Ly6C (clone HK1.4, Biolegend), Ly6G (Clone 1A8, Biolegend), RAE-1γ (clone CX1, Biolegend), CD4 (clone GK1.5), CD3ε (clone 145–2C11, BD Bioscience), NK1.1 (clone PK136, Biolegend), Foxp3 (clone PCH101, eBioscience), CD8 (53–6.7, Biolegend), IFNg (XMG1.2, Biolegend) and CD45 (30-F11, Biolegend) were used. Live cell gating was performed using Zombie Aqua Fixable Viability Kit (Biolegend). To detect NKG2D-Fc, we used the PE goat anti-mouse antibodies (Multiple Adsorption, BD Bioscience Cat No: 550589).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Tumor-Infiltrating Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single-cell suspensions of transplanted tumors were obtained by digestion with 1 mg/ml Collagenase I (Sigma) and 1 mg/ml Dispase II (Roche) in RPMI containing 5 % FBS for 45 min at 37°C under shaking condition. The cell suspension was passed through a 70 μm nylon mesh and centrifuged. After red blood cell lysis, Fc receptors were blocked with anti-mouse FcR antibody (clone 93, Biolegend) for 15 min at a 1:100 dilution on ice. Then, cells were stained with anti-CD45 (clone 30-F11, Biolegend), CD11b (clone M1/70, Biolegend), Gr-1 (clone RB6-8C5, Biolegend), F4/80 (clone BM8, Biolegend), PDGFRα (clone APA5; Biolegend), CD206 (clone C068C2, Biolegend), CD11c (clone N418, Biolegend) and MHC II (I-A/I-E, clone M5/114.15.2, Biolegend) antibodies for 30 min at a 1:100 dilution on ice. For analysis of Treg cells in the tumor, cells were stained with anti-CD4 (clone GK1.5, Biolegend, 1:100), Foxp3 (clone FJK-16s, eBioscience, 1:50) antibodies using a Foxp3 staining buffer kit following the instructions (eBioscience). Samples were acquired on a Canto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and the data were analyzed with FlowJo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Tumor Immune Infiltrates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Subcutaneous tumors were fixed with Z-fix (Fisher Scientific) and frozen in OCT (Fisher Scientific). Samples were cut into 8 µm sections using a cryostat (Leica) and analyzed by immunofluorescence using antibodies against Arginase 1 (Life Technologies) and Gr-1 (clone RB6-8C5, BioLegend). Sections were imaged using Leica Thunder Imager Live cell and 3D Assay microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Sorting and Sequencing Microglia from Embryonic Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following single-cell suspension preparation, cells were pelleted and subsequently stained with fluorophore-conjugated antibodies against CD11b (clone M1/70), CD45 (clone 30-F11), CD45.1 (clone A20), CD45.2 (clone 104), CX3CR1 (clone SA011F11; BioLegend), F4/80 (clone BM8; BioLegend), Ly6C (clone HK1.4), Ly6G (clone 1A8; BioLegend), Gr-1 (clone RB6-8C5), CD115 (clone AFS98), MHC II (clone M5/114.15.2), CD11c (clone N418), CD64 (clone X54-5/7.1; BioLegend), CD86 (clone GL1; BioLegend), Tmem119 (clone 106–6; Abcam), and either DAPI or propium iodide viability dyes (all from eBioscience if not indicated otherwise). Flow cytometry was performed using a Fortessa analyzer (BD Biosciences), and FACS was performed using a FACS Aria II (BD Biosciences) or LSRII (BD Biosciences). The gating strategies used for flow cytometry analysis of embryonic tissues are adapted from Hoeffel et al. (2015) (link) and shown in Fig. S5. Resident microglia were sorted as doubletDAPICD11b+CD45int (Fig. S2 B). Flow cytometry data analysis was performed using FlowJo (TreeStar) software. For ULI RNA-seq, microglia were double-sorted to reach a purity of >98%, and 1,000 cells were sequenced.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Isolation and Characterization of Microglia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were deeply anesthetized with a lethal dose of choral hydrate and transcardially perfused with 0.1 M PBS. Brain was removed and one forebrain hemisphere (without olfactory bulb) was minced, incubated in phenol-red free DMEM supplemented with 2% heat inactivated FBS, 10mM HEPES and Collagenase type IV (0.4 mg/mL) for 15 min and then passed through a 19G blunt syringe to obtain a homogeneous cell suspension. Mononuclear cells were separated with a 40% Percoll gradient. Isolated cells were surface stained in FACS buffer for 20–30 min on ice with the following antibodies: CD11b (clone M1/70, eBioscience), F4/80 (clone CI: A3-1, BioRad), CD45 (clone 30F11, eBioscience), MHC II (clone M5/114.15.2, eBioscience), CD3e (clone 145-2C11, Biolegend), Gr-1 (clone RB6–8C5, Biolegend), CD115 (clone AFS98, eBioscience). Multiparameter analysis was performed on a LSR II Fortessa (BD) and analyzed with FlowJo software (Tree Star) (Details are included in the Flow Cytometry Reporting Summary). Dead cells and doublets were excluded from all analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Nanoparticle Tracking in Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For these experiments, nanoparticles (CyAL5.5-FH, 10 mg/kg) were injected into the tail vein and mice were sacrificed after a 3-hour incubation. Single-cell suspensions were generated from harvested esophagi following dissociation via rat tail collagenase and trypsin/ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid (EDTA) digestion. Similarly, spleens were mechanically dissociated and red blood cells were lysed to generate single-cell suspensions of leukocyte populations.2 (link) Staining of cells was performed in PBS + 2% fetal bovine serum. The following antibodies were used for immunophenotyping: CD45 (clone 30-F11), CD19 (clone 6D5), CD3E (clone 145-2C11), CD49b (clone DX5), CD11c (clone N418), F4/80 (clone CI:A3-1), Gr-1 (clone RB6-8C5), and CD11b (clone M1/70), all from BioLegend (San Diego, CA). Nanoparticles were detected via the conjugated CyAL5.5 fluorochrome. Flow cytometry was performed on a BD LSR II instrument (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Data were analyzed using FlowJo version 9.4 software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR). For simulating the modulation of immune cells in response to treatment, 9-month-old L2-Cre;p120flox/flox mice were treated with dexamethasone (10 mg/kg/day) or PBS (control) once a day for 7 days. Twenty-four hours following treatment, all mice received nanoparticle injection followed by immunophenotyping of CyAL5.5-positive cells as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Neutrophil Depletion in Mouse Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
C57BL/6J and hck−/−fgr−/− mice were depleted using an anti-Ly6G mAb (Bio-X-Cell, West Lebanon, NH), as described in ref. 28 (link). Briefly, anti-Ly6G mAb was diluted into sterile endotoxin-free 0.9% NaCl saline solution at a concentration of 1mg/ml. The antibody was injected i.p. at a dose of 0.5 mg per mouse, 17 hours prior to intranasal instillation of LPS (5 µg) or PBS. Control mice were injected i.p. with saline. 2 h after intranasal treatments of depleted and control mice, peripheral blood was collected from all experimental animals to confirm neutrophil depletion by cytofluorimetric analysis. This was performed using a panel of five fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies to CD11b, GR-1 (clone RB6-8C5, Biolegend), CD11c, Ly6C and Ly6G.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell surface staining was performed using fluorophore conjugated anti-mouse CD4 clone GK1.5, CD8 clone 53-6.7, Gr1 clone RB6-8c5, and CD11b clone M1/70 antibodies from Biolegend. Dead cells were excluded via 7AAD negativity. Data was acquired on a FACSCanto using FACSDiva software (BD Biosciences) and analyzed on FlowJo software vX10.07r2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Tumor Dissociation and Immune Cell Sorting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumors were harvested on day 5 and homogenized in RPMI using a gentleMACS Octo Dissociator (Miltenyi Biotec) on m_lung_01_01 and m_lung_02_01settings. Cells were separated with Lymphoprep (Stem Cell Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and stained for sorting with Zombie UV Fixable Viability Dye (BioLegend) as well as antibodies specific for CD45.2 (clone 104; Biolegend), CD11b (clone M1/70; Biolegend), and Gr-1 (clone RB6-8C5; Biolegend), CD4 (clone RM4-5; Biolegend), CD19 (clone 1D3; eBiosciences), and NK1.1 (clone PK136; Biolegend). Representative FACS plots from sorting are shown in Supplemental Figure 4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!