The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

14 protocols using alliance e2695 hplc

1

Phytochemical Analysis of Botanical Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The dried extracts were dissolved in 2 mL of DMSO, filtrated through, and analyzed with high-performance liquid chromatography (Alliance HPLC e2695, PDA 2998, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ACQUITY QDa Mass Detector, Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The chromatographic separation was achieved with a column (Symmetry C18, 150 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) at a flow of 0.8 mL/min with a linear gradient system for 30 min (A: 0.1% formic acid in Water, B: methanol). The column temperature was adjusted to 40 °C, and the injection volume was 5 μL. The exact analytical conditions are described in Supplementary Figures S3–S6. For mass detection, the positive-ion ESI mode was used. The rest of the capillary voltage settings were: Pos: 0.8 kV, gain: 1, and probe: 600 °C, while the cone voltage was set to 15 V.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of TP-Loaded Liposomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dynamic light scattering with a Zetasizer Nano ZS90 (Malvern, UK) was used to determine the particle size, polydispersity index, and zeta potential for all liposomes, while transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to observe their morphologies (HT7800, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Furthermore, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used for measuring the TP content (Alliance HPLC E2695, Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). The unencapsulated drug was separated from the liposome solution by centrifugal ultrafiltration (4500 rpm, 5 min) (TG16-WS, Changsha, China), and the encapsulation rate was determined by HPLC. Specifically, the method involved the addition of 20 volumes of methanol to the liposome solution, followed by demulsification using ultrasound for 20 min and measurement of the total TP amount (Wtotal). In addition, 0.2 mL liposome solution was measured precisely into an ultrafiltration centrifuge tube (MWCO 30,000 Da), diluted to 1 mL with PBS, and centrifuged (4500 rpm, 5 min) to obtain the unwrapped TP. The unwrapped drug content (WUnwrapped drug) was determined, and the encapsulation efficiency (EE) was calculated as:
where WUnwrapped and Wtotal represent the unencapsulated amount and the total amount of the drug, respectively. The drug loading (DL%) for TP-loaded liposomes was then calculated using the following equation:
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Lf-GL Conjugate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy measurements (FT-IR, NICOLET IS50, Thermo Fisher Scientific) were conducted to identify the functional group of Lf-GL. The molecular weight of Lf-GL was determined by SDS-PAGE (12%-gel) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI TOF). MALDI-TOF was conducted at Seoul National University (Korea) using a MALDI-TOF Voyager DE-STR (Applied Biosystems, MA, USA). A sinapinic acid (Sigma-Aldrich) aqueous solution containing about 30% acetonitrile in 0.15% trifluoroacetic acid (Millipore) was used as a matrix. High performance liquid chromatography (Alliance HPLC e2695, Waters, MA, UK) using a gel permeation chromatography (GPC) column was performed to verify GL content in the Lf-GL conjugate. The mobile phase was composed of methanol, acetonitrile, water, and acetic acid in a ratio of 55:23.69:19.63:0.68. GL was dissolved in the mobile phase in different concentrations (2.5 to 200 × 10–6 M), and Lf-GL (25 × 10–6 M) was also dissolved in the mobile phase. Ultrahydrogel 120 Column (Waters) was used as a column, and the flow rate was 1 mL min−1. Then, absorbance was measured at 254 nm, and the results were calibrated with Empower software (Waters).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Gliotoxin in Culture Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC Alliance e2695, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) was used for the quantification of GT in culture extracts as described before [50 (link),67 (link),68 (link),69 (link)]. A C-18 column (XBridge® C18 3.5 µm 4.6 × 100 mm Column, Waters) was used for setting the temperature at 30 °C. HPLC analysis of samples was performed as gradient elution using water and methanol: 0–10 min: 55% water; 10–11 min: 40% water; 11–20 min: 40% water; 20–22 min: 55% water. The flow rate was set to 0.8 mL/min and the injection volume was 10 µL. An ultraviolet signal detector (2489 UV/Vis Detector, Waters) was used, monitoring the absorbance at 273 nm. A standard curve was obtained with a GT standard ranging from 0.1 to 35 µg/mL (Figure S1). As a positive control, a GT and bmGT standard extracted from RPMI or Czapek-Dox medium was used. The overall recovery was dependent on the starting concentration, reaching up to 72% and 91% recovery of GT and bmGT, respectively. The detection limit of the HPLC was 16.7 ng/mL for both GT and bmGT.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

HPLC Analysis of Psoralen and 5-MOP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The qualitative and quantitative of the psoralen and 5-MOP analyses were performed in a HPLC Alliance e2695 (Waters®, USA) with a photodiode array (PDA) detector model 2998. Empower 2.0 chromatography data software was employed for the control of equipment and for the treatment of the data. The separation was carried out with a chromatography column zorbax Eclipse XBD-C8 (4.6 × 250 mm × 5μm) (Agilent®, USA).
The mobile phase was composed of acetonitrile and ultrapure water (45:55 v/v) at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min. The injection volume was set to 20 μL. The detection wavelength was set at 244 nm for psoralen and 220 nm for 5-MOP. The chromatography column was maintained at 30°C, and the run time at 30 min.[8 ] This chromatographic method was revalidated and system suitability parameters were checked according to the international parameters.[13 ]
The chromatographic analysis of the extract of B. gaudichaudii and pellets was conducted under the same conditions used with the standard, respecting the linear dynamic range.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

HPLC Analysis of Encapsulated AD 198

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Encapsulated AD 198 content in the liposomes was calculated using a Waters Alliance e2695 HPLC coupled to a Waters 2998 UV Photodiode Array Detector. Samples were prepared at a dilution factor of 20. Briefly, 50 µL of the purified liposomes were dissolved in 950 µL of 1:1 methanol:ethanol. Samples were briefly vortexed to give a clear solution and 300 µL transferred to Waters total recovery HPLC vials. These vials were loaded into the autosampler of the HPLC separations module. Conditions for HPLC analysis were adapted from previously optimized methods [51 (link)]. The column used for separation was Waters Nova-Pak® C18 4 µm, 3.9 × 150 mm and was maintained at 30 °C throughout the separation process. The mobile phase was a 70:30 acetonitrile:pH 4.0 ammonium formate buffer. The ammonium formate buffer was prepared by adding 3.85 mL of ammonium hydroxide to 950 mL of HPLC grade water. The pH was adjusted to 4.0 using 80% formic acid and the volume was made up to 1 L. The flow rate for the mobile phase was maintained at 1.2 mL/ min, the injection volume was 20 µL and the run time for each injection was 7 min. AD 198 eluted between 3 and 4 min and was detected at a wavelength (λ) of 254 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

HPLC Analysis of MDA Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MDA levels were determined as resultant of oxidative stress occurrence, which causes lipid peroxidation and the production of this metabolite. Accordingly, we used HPLC as previously described by Victorino et al. [30 (link)], with slight modifications. The analyses were conducted with an Alliance e2695 HPLC (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) equipped with a SecurityGuard ODS-C18 (4 × 3.0 mm, Phenomenex), C18 reverse phase column (Eclipse XDB-C18; 4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm, Agilent), and a photodiode array detector (Photodiode Array Detector (PDA), 2998). Analyses were conducted using Empower 2 software (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). MDA standards were prepared using 1,1,3,3-tetraethoxypropane (TEP). Aliquots containing 250 μL of cells + supernatants were deproteinized by adding 20% trichloroacetic acid and reacted with 1 mL of thiobarbituric acid. The mobile phase was 70% 10 mM KH2PO4 buffer, pH 7.0, and 40% HPLC-grade methanol. Readings were obtained at 532 nm, following an 8 min isocratic flow at the rate of 1 mL/min. The results were expressed in nM MDA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Tobramycin Content Uniformity Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tobramycin content uniformity in the eight formulations was evaluated using a validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) method. 10 mg of TOBI-EEG formulation was dissolved in 100 mL water, and tobramycin was quantitatively analyzed using an LC-MS method. Analysis was performed using Alliance e2695 HPLC (Waters, Milford, MA) coupled with ACQUITY QDA Mass Detector (Waters, Milford, MA). Chromatographic separation was performed using Obelisc R HPLC column (2.1×150mm, 5μm, 100 Å; SIELC Technologies, Inc., Wheeling, IL) and mobile phase consisting 10% acetonitrile and 90% water containing 0.3% v/v formic acid and 0.01% w/v ammonium formate. Isocratic elution was used at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min and sample injection volume was set at 10 μL. QDa parameters were as follows: capillary voltage, 0.8 kV; cone voltage, 20 V; source temperature, 600 °C. SIR mode was selected to acquire data. Electrospray ionization was used with a positive mode. For tobramycin quantification, single ion monitoring at 468.5 m/z was employed. Empower 4 (Waters, Milford, MA) was used to control LC-QDa system and analyze data obtained. Three replicates were performed to obtain the mean (SD) mass of tobramycin in each mg of TOBI-EEG formulation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

GTPase Activity Kinetics Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GTP hydrolysis rates were calculated under single-turnover conditions. 5 μM of CtRoco-L487A was incubated with 5 μM of GTP in the presence of 100 μM of the Nb of interest at 25°C. Samples were taken at different time points ranging from 0 to 180 min and the reaction was stopped by incubation at 95°C for 3 min. Samples were mixed with the same volume of HPLC buffer and 50 µl was injected on a reversed-phase C18 column (Phenomenex, Jupiter 5 mm) attached to an Alliance e2695 HPLC (Waters) using 100 mM KH2PO4 pH 6.4, 10 mM tetrabutylammonium bromide, 7.5% acetonitrile as the mobile phase. The 254 nm absorption peaks of GDP were converted to concentrations by using a standard curve, and GDP concentrations were plotted in function of time. All experiments were performed in triplicate and data were fitted on single-exponential equation using GraphPad Prism 7.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Ibuprofen Quantification by HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The amount of ibuprofen in the samples was quantified using Waters Alliance e2695 HPLC equipped with 2998 photodiode array detector and Empower 3.0 software. The analysis was carried out on a reverse phase Phenomenex® C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm; 5 µm particle size) at 25 °C. The mobile phase was a mixture (60:40) of acetonitrile and water (adjusted to pH 3.8 with acetic acid) at a constant flow rate of 1.5 mL/min. Samples (60 µL) were injected into the column using autosampler and monitored at 220 nm. Retention time of ibuprofen was 6.5 min. All the samples injected were filtered through 0.45 µm membrane filter.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!