The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using x pert pro mrd x ray diffractometer

1

Characterization of Adsorbent Material

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following instrumental studies were performed in order to characterize the prepared adsorbent: SEM, EDX, XRD, FTIR and BET. The SEM and EDAX analyses were determined with a Quanta 3D instrument AL99/D8229 (FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA). X–ray powder diffraction was conducted using an X’Pert PRO MRD X–ray diffractometer (PANalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands). The experiment was recorded by monitoring the diffraction pattern appearing in the 2θ range from 10° to 90°. Infrared absorption spectra (400–4000 cm−1) were analyzed with a Thermo Scientific Nicolet 6700 FT-IR spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). BET surface area analysis was performed via Quantachrome instruments (Boynton Beach, FL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multimodal Material Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy images were taken with a Carl Zeiss Supra 40 field emission scanning electron microscope at an acceleration of 5 kV. Transmission electron microscopy images were acquired using a Hitachi HT7700 transmission electron microscope. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) spectra were acquired by a Bruker Vector-22 FT-IR spectrometer at room temperature. X-ray diffraction of patterns were carried out on a PANalytical X’pert PRO MRD X-ray diffractometer equipped with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54056 Å). The X-ray microtomography was conducted on Zeiss Xradia 520 for the 3D microstructural information. The raw data were reconstructed using the software Dragonfly by assembling the static images in sequence. Atomic force microscope images were taken with a Bruker Dimension FastScan.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Nanocomposite Aerogels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM images were taken with a Carl Zeiss Supra 40 field emission scanning electron microscope (2–5 kV, depending on the sample state). All samples were measured in the form of aerogels that were prepared by freeze-drying of the purified wet nanocomposite pellicles. All aerogel samples were sputtered with gold for 30 s at a constant current of 30 mA before observation. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were acquired using a JEOL JEM-ARM200F transmission electron microscope (200 kV). XRD data were measured by a PANalytical X'pert PRO MRD X-ray diffractometer equipped with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54056 Å). The samples were tested in the form of films prepared by hot-pressing of the purified wet nanocomposite pellicles. UV–vis spectra were recorded on UV-2501PC/2550 at room temperature (Shimadzu Corporation, Japan). TGA data were measured in a nitrogen atmosphere with a TA Instruments SDT Q600 thermogravimetric analyzer. All the samples were tested in the form of films.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Material Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM analysis was conducted using a Carl Zeiss Supra 40 field emission scanning electron microscope (2–5 kV, depending on the sample state). The SEM samples were coated with Au film for 30 s at a constant current of 30 mA before observation.
EDS data were acquired by EDS (Hitachi S4800, Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; FEI, Sirion 200, Philips, Hillsboro, OR, USA).
Infrared spectra of the samples were acquired by a Thermo Scientific Nicolet 8700 FT-IR (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Madison, WI, USA) spectrometer in the attenuated total reflectance (ATR) mode.
XRD data were measured by a PANalytical X’pert PRO MRD X-ray diffractometer equipped with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54056 Å).
Samples were characterized using a UV−Vis−NIR spectrophotometer (Lambda 750, PerKinElmer Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Variable Temperature PXRD of 1a

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Variable temperature PXRD patterns were measured on a PanAlytical X’pert PRO MRD x-ray diffractometer with Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 0.1543 nm) at 40 kV from 4° to 60°. PXRD patterns were recorded on pelletized (10 mm by 10 mm) as-made 1a at various temperatures between 25° and 400°C with a heating rate of 5°C/min and a step of 0.02°.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Variable Temperature PXRD of Al(HCOO)3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Variable temperature powder x-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns were measured on a PanAlytical X’pert PRO MRD x-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å, 30 kV, and 40 mA). PXRD patterns were recorded on pelletized (10 mm by 10 mm) as-made Al(HCOO)3 at various temperatures between 25° and 280°C (298 to 553 K) with a heating rate of 5°/min, a step of 0.025°, and a scan speed of 1 s per step.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Carbon Nanofiber Polymers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM images were taken with a Carl Zeiss Supra 40 field emission scanning electron microscope (5 kV), and all samples were gold-sputtered for 30 s at a constant current of 30 mA before observation. XRD data were measured by a PANalytical X’pert PRO MRD X-ray diffractometer equipped with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54056 Å), and the samples were prepared by cutting down a ~0.5-mm layer of CNFPs. Thermogravimetric analysis data were measured in air atmosphere with a TA Instruments SDT Q600 thermogravimetric analyzer, and the samples were prepared by grinding CNFPs into powders. FTIR spectra were acquired by a Bruker Vector-22 FTIR spectrometer in attenuated total reflectance mode, and the samples were prepared by cutting down a ~0.5-mm layer of CNFPs. 13C-NMR cross-polarization magic angle spinning spectra were recorded at 100.62 MHz on a Bruker Avance III 400 WB spectrometer using a 90° pulse of 4 μs, an acquisition time of 33.9 ms, a contact time of 3 ms, a recycle delay of 5 s, and a spin rate of 14 kHz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!