The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

14 protocols using un scan it gel version 6

1

RNA Extraction and PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted as described previously [26 (link)]. The cDNA obtained from 0.5 μg total RNA was used as a template for PCR amplification. Oligonucleotide primers were designed on the basis of GenBank entries for mouse MMP-9 and β-actin. The primers were MMP-9: 5′- GCTGACTACGATAAGGACGGCA-3′ (sense) and 5′-TAGTGGTGCAGGCAGAGTAGGA-3′ (antisense); β-actin: 5′-AGAGGGAAATCGTGCGTGAC-3′ (sense) and 5′-CAATAGTGATGACCTGGCGT-3′ (anti-sense). The amplification was performed in 30 cycles (at 55 °C, 30 s; 72 °C, 1 min; and 94 °C, 30 s). PCR fragments were determined on 2% agarose 1X TAE gel containing ethidium bromide by the molecular weight markers. The β-actin, an internal reference RNA, was amplified in parallel, and cDNA amounts were standardized to equivalent β-actin mRNA levels. The images were quantified and analyzed by an UN-SCAN-IT gel version 6.1 software (Silk Scientific, Inc., Orem, UT, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of mRNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each experiment was repeated two or more times. Bands from RT-PCR were quantified with UN-SCAN-IT gel version 6.1 software (Silk Scientific Inc., Orem, UT, USA). mRNA levels were calculated using β-actin levels as the reference. Statistical comparisons between different treatments were analyzed by Mann-Whitney test and analysis of variance. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS ver. 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance was considered when P-values were less than 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative PCR Analysis of MMP-9

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted as described previously [45 (link)]. The cDNA obtained from 0.5 μg total RNA was used as a template for PCR amplification. Oligonucleotide primers were designed on the basis of Genbank entries for mouse MMP-9 and β-actin. The primers were as follows: MMP-9: 5′-GCTGACTACGATAAGGACGGCA-3′ (sense), 5′-TAGTGGTGCAGGCAGAGTAGGA-3′ (antisense); β-actin: 5′-AGAGGGAAATCGTGCGTGAC-3′ (sense), 5′-CAATAGTGATGACCTGGCGT-3′ (anti-sense). The amplification was performed in 30 cycles at 55 °C, 30 s; 72 °C, 1 min; 94 °C, 30 s. PCR fragments were analyzed on 2% agarose 1 × TAE gel containing ethidium bromide, and their size was compared with the molecular weight markers. Amplification of β-actin, a relatively invariant internal reference RNA, was performed in parallel, and cDNA amounts were standardized to equivalent β-actin mRNA levels. The images were quantified and analyzed by UN-SCAN-IT gel version 6.1 software (Silk Scientific, Inc., Orem, UT, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Protein Immunoblotting Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein immunoblotting was performed from whole‐cell lysates from the outer renal cortex by sodium dodecyl sulfate‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and electrophoretic transfer onto nitrocellulose membrane, as described previously.8 Staining was done with Ponceau S verified uniformity of protein loading and transfer.
Incubation with primary antibodies was performed overnight at 4°C (rabbit anti‐phospho extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK, Thermo Fisher, #MA5‐15174—1:500) or anti HSP 72 (StressMarq Bioscience, #SCM‐100—1:300). After incubation with horseradish peroxidase‐coupled secondary antibody (1:1,000) for 1 hour at room temperature, protein was detected by enhanced chemiluminescence using a C‐Digit Blot Scanner (Li‐COR).
Quantification of protein content was performed densitometrically with UN‐SCAN‐IT gel version 6.1 (Silk Scientific, Orem UT) as normalized against the expression of total ERK (Thermo Fisher, #MA5‐15174) or ß‐actin (Thermo Fisher, #PA1‐46296).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunoblot Protein Level Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Semi-quantitative evaluation of protein levels detected by immunoblotting was implemented with computer-assisted densitometry (UN-SCAN-IT gel version 6.1; Silk Scientific, Inc., Orem, UT, USA). Data were then acquired and integrated density values expressed as a percentage of densitometric levels using arbitrary densitometric units.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Muscle Fiber Type Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protein concentration of each TA muscle was optimized so that 0.4 μg of protein was added to each gel channel in duplicate. SDS-PAGE was performed on each concentrate with a 0.75 mm thick 6% acrylamide/30% glycerol separating gel (18 × 16 cm) and a 4% acrylamide/30% glycerol stacking gel. A silver staining kit (SilverQuest Silver Staining Kit, Life Technologies, New York, USA) was used to stain the gel for visualization of protein bands. Each silver-stained gel was imaged digitally. An investigator masked to rat age and treatment determined the optical density of each band using computer-assisted image analysis and densiometry (UN-Scan-IT gel Version 6.1, Silk Scientific, Inc, Utah, USA). The ratio of the density of an individual MHC isoform band to the total density within a column was used to determine the percentage of each MHC isoform per lane 19 ,44 (link),46 (link)-51 (link). Good to excellent reliability using these procedures has been demonstrated in previous studies 50 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data columns are shown as mean ± S.E.M. In Western blots, n is presented as the number of separate experiments (minimum of 3). Western blots were quantified using Un-Scan-It gel version 6.1 (Silk Scientific Inc., Orem, UT). Statistical differences between control and experimental conditions were determined by using Mann Whitney non-parametric test followed by Dunnet’s post hoc test or a Mann & Whitney non-parametric test when comparing only two conditions within R Software (R-project). P values < 0.05 were judged to be statistically significant. Graphs were generated using Graphpad Prism 7 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Hippocampal Protein Extraction and Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total proteins extraction from hippocampal tissues sections was performed using RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime; P0013B), and then separated with SDS-PAGE gel and transferred onto the PVDF membrane. The membrane was blocked in 5% (0.75 g milk powder + 15 mL PBS) milk for 1–2 h and then incubated with primary antibodies as follows: phosphorylated tau (p-tau; 46 kDa; 1:500; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA); total tat (t-tau; 79 kDa; 1:200; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA); Aβ1–42 (40 kDa; 1:500; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA); ADAM10 (84 kDa; 1:1000; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA); and GAPDH (36 Da; 1:20000; Proteintech: 10494–1-AP) at 4 °C overnight. After washing in TBST for 3 times, the corresponding secondary antibodies (goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L); 1:1000; Jackson; 715–035-151) was applied to the membrane for 2 h at 37 °C. The band was visualized by the ECL (Share-Bio; SB-WB012). Western blots were quantified using Un-Scan-It gel version 6.1 (Silk Scientific Inc., Orem, UT).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Hepatic Protein Immunoblot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hepatic cell lysates (40 μg proteins) were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and subjected to immunoblot analyses, as previously described [31 (link)]. Specific antibodies to CYP2E1, iNOS, 3-NT and β-actin, as a loading control, were then incubated overnight at 4°C. After removal of the primary antibodies and followed by three separate steps of washing, the nitrocellulose membranes were incubated with the appropriate secondary antibodies conjugated with horseradish peroxidase. Protein bands were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence and their densities quantified using UN-SCAN-IT gel version 6.1 from Silk Scientific (Orem, Utah 84059 USA). For the immunoprecipitation experiment, 400 μg of hepatic cell lysates from each mouse was used to prepare a total of 2 mg proteins/sample (pooled from 5 mice/sample out of 10 mice/strain to prepare 2 samples/strain) and the specific antibody (5 μg) to collagen 1A1 or HSP90 was used with Pierce protein A/G magnetic beads from Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The immunoprecipitated proteins were subsequently analyzed by immunoblot analysis using the specific antibody against collagen 1A1, HSP90, or 3-NT (Table 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Hesperidin Modulates Astrocyte TGF-β1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Secondary astrocytes were grown in 96 wells-plate for 2 days in DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% FBS. After reaching confluence, astrocytes were washed and maintained in serum-free medium for 24 h and, then, treated with 10 μM hesperidin or DMSO 0.1% for 2 h. After that, cells were fixed with 4% PFA for 20 min, washed three times with PBS-containing 0.1% triton X-100 and incubated with the Odyssey blocking buffer (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA) for 1.5 h at room temperature. Primary antibodies were: anti-mouse TGF-β1 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA; 1:100) and anti-rabbit cyclophilin B (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA; 1:1000) overnight at 4°C. Plates were washed with PBS containing 0.1% tween-20 for three times, followed by incubation with IRDye 680CW goat anti-rabbit and IRDye 800CW goat anti-mouse antibodies (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA; 1:800) for 1 h at room temperature. Plates were scanned with the Odyssey Infrared Imaging System and analyzed using the program Un-Scan-It gel version 6.1 (Silk Scientific, Inc., Orem, UT, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!