The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Whatman cellulose filter paper

Manufactured by Cytiva

Whatman cellulose filter paper is a laboratory filter paper made from high-quality cellulose. It is designed for general filtration applications in research and analytical laboratories.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

6 protocols using whatman cellulose filter paper

1

Measurement of Larval Body Parts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We measured M and HPC of D. gaucha larva [12 , 35 ]. We measured length and width of M in micrometers (μm). Only the length (μm) of HPC was measured. HPC width changes notably at the two ends (Fig 4). This Fig 4 agrees almost exactly with Fig 1 published by Alvarez et al. [22 ]. However, Fig 1 in Alvarez et al. [22 ] contains some inaccuracies mainly in the names; these were corrected as shown in Fig 4 of the present manuscript. Table 3 describes the measurements performed on 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168 and 192-hour-old larvae, covering the entirely larval period (N = 50 larvae per age and genotypic group). The goal was evaluate the effect of hybridization between the BA and CJ parental strains on the growth of those body parts.
The larvae were randomly collected and sacrificed by placing in phosphate-buffered saline PBS 0.1 M-1. Once dead, the larvae remained completely extended. The larvae were individually collected from the buffer and dried by depositing them on Whatman cellulose filter paper. Then, M and HPC were dissected and mounted as described by Frías et al. [35 ]. For this task we used a stereomicroscope Leica MZ6 at 20 x magnification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Heavy Metal Contamination in Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plant samples were collected with appropriate permissions and that all plant experiments were conducted in accordance to relevant regulations and guidelines. Washing with distilled water was used to clean plants from soil particles [23 ]. The plant samples were dried at 60 °C for 48 h before grinding [23 ]. 2 g of the samples were placed in a 50 mL porcelain dish. Then, 10 mL HNO3 (68% w/w) was poured into the dish and heated for oxidation on a hot plate for 30–45 min. 2 mL HClO3 (37% w/w) was added to the sample after cooling and reheating to obtain a clear, semi-dry solution. The sample was then cooled and passed through grade 42 Whatman® cellulose filter paper. Then, it was transferred to a 50-mL volume balloon to reach the desired volume, and distilled water was added [24 ,25 ]. Analysis of heavy metal concentrations in the plant was performed from three parts: root, stem, and leaf. Cd, Pb, Ni, Fe, Zn, and Cu were selected to assay the contamination. Heavy metal concentration measured by Atomic Absorption Spectrometer (Perkin-Elmer® AAnalyst 200). The concentrations of the measured metals were compared with the permissible limits of valid international standards. Then the severity of pollution due to the presence of leachate on the surrounding environment is measured by BF, PI, and Nemerow Pollution Index (NPI) [26 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation of Pine Bark Proanthocyanidins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
P. eldarica proanthocyanidins was obtained according to the method used by Iravani (15 ). Briefly, 100 g of pine bark powder extracted with 600 ml of boiling water, and then cooled down to 20°C. After filtration, 250 ml of liquid was collected; certain amount of sodium chloride was added up to saturation, and the precipitate formed was removed by filtration on Whatman® cellulose filter paper. Subsequently, the filtrate was extracted three times with ethyl acetate. The ethyl acetate phase was collected and dried using anhydrous sodium sulfate and reduced to 1/5 of its original volume using a rotary evaporator. The extract was then poured into three volumes of chloroform, while stirring mechanically. The proanthocyanidins were precipitated as a light beige color powder, collected by filtration and stored at −20°C. All chemicals used were of analytical grade purity (Merck, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Extraction of Plant Phytochemicals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The leaves of the plants were cleaned and air-dried to a constant weight and the dried samples were pulverised using an electronic blender, grounded, and weighed. The powdered plant materials in conical flasks were soaked and subjected to intermittent stirring in 90% aqueous acetone and warmed in the water bath at 60 °C for 2 h with slight modification [22 (link)]. The mixture was filtered with Whatman cellulose filter paper under pressure using a pump and the plant material was subjected to a second extraction after soaking overnight and the filtrate pooled before rotary evaporation. The final residue or extract obtained was allowed to dry in the fume cupboard and stored at −20 °C until required for use. (1 mg extract dissolved in 1 ml acetone is used in subsequent analysis).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Histone H3.3 Methylation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chaetocin was tested in 10-dose IC50 mode with 3-fold serial dilution starting at 10 μM at Reaction Biology (Malvern, PA). Reactions were carried out with recombinant histone H3.3 (5 μM), recombinant SETD1B protein (5 μM), and [3H]S-adenosyl-L-methionine (1 μM) in reaction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCI, pH 8.5, 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCI2, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF, and 1% DMSO). Reaction mixtures were incubated for 60 min at 30°C and then spotted onto a Whatman cellulose filter paper and counted in a scintillation counter.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Acetone Extraction of Plant Bioactives

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As previously reported by Nas et al. (2019), the leaves of the plants were cleaned and air-dried to a constant weight. The dried plant sample was pulverized using an electronic blender, and the ground plant was weighed. The powdered plant materials were soaked in 90% aqueous acetone in conical flasks, subjected to intermittent stirring, and warmed in the water bath at 60 °C for 2 h [27 (link)]. The mixture was filtered through Whatman cellulose filter paper under pressure using a pump. The plant material was subjected to a second extraction by soaking overnight, and the filtrates were pooled together before being subjected to a rotary evaporator. The residue or extract obtained was allowed to dry in the fume cupboard. The residual extracts were stored at −20 °C until required for use. A percentage yield of 6.3% was obtained after 97.6 g of plant material underwent the extraction process to give 6.155 g of the extract.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!