The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using anti hla dr apc cy7

1

Isolation and Purification of Regulatory T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from healthy donors (Hoxworth blood center, Cincinnati, OH) were separated by centrifugation through Ficoll-Hypaque (GE, Fairfield, CT). CD4+ T cells were purified by negative selection using the Miltenyi CD4 negative separation kit (Auburn, CA), per the manufacturer’s instructions. Aliquots of purified CD4+ T cells were frozen in FBS + 10% DMSO and stored in liquid nitrogen. The viability of thawed cryopreserved cells was >90%. To isolate bulk Treg, cryopreserved CD4+ T cells were stained with live dead aqua (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA), anti-CD8-FITC, anti-CD25-APC (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA), anti-CD127-PE (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA), and sorted using a FACS Aria (BD) (supplemental Fig. S1A). Purity of the sorted Treg was >90%, as determined by postsorting analysis of FOXP3 expression (supplemental Fig. S1B). FOXP3 expression was also significantly higher in Treg compared with conventional CD4+T cells (non-Treg) after sorting (supplemental Fig. S1C). In some experiments, Treg subsets (nTreg, mTreg, and emTreg) were isolated, briefly cryopreserved CD4+ T cells were stained with anti-CD8-FITC, anti-CD25-APC, anti-HLA-DR-APC-Cy7 (BD), anti-CD127-PE (Beckman Coulter), anti-CD45RA-PB, anti-CD95-BV510 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA), and sorted using an FACS Aria (supplemental Fig. S1A).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Monocyte Subset Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Monocytes subsets were identified by size, granularity, and by expression levels of CD14 and CD16. Fluorescence minus 1 and isotype gating strategies were used to identify expression of surface markers as previously reported17 .
Cell surface molecule expression was monitored using the following fluorochrome-labeled antibodies: anti-Tissue Factor fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (American Diagnostica, Stamford, CT), anti-CD14 Pacific Blue, anti-CD16 phycoerythrin (PE), anti-CD36 allophycocyanin (APC), (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA), and anti-HLA-DR APC-cy7 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), anti-Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2 APC, anti-TLR4 PEcy7, and anti-TLR-6 biotin (eBioscience, San Diego, CA), streptavidin APC-cy7 (BD Bioscience).
Whole blood samples were incubated for 15 minutes on ice with FACS Lyse buffer (BD Biosciences) and then washed in buffer (phosphate buffered saline with 1% bovine serum albumin and 0.1% sodium azide). Cells were then stained for 30 minutes in the dark on ice and then washed in buffer, fixed in 1% formaldehyde, and analyzed using a Miltenyi MACS Quant flow cytometer (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). MACS Quant software (version 2.21031.1, Miltenyi Biotec), and Prism 5.0 Graphpad software (La Jolla, CA) were used to organize and analyze the data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PBMCs were stained with the following list of fluorescently labeled antibodies against cell surface markers subsequently detected by flow cytometry: anti-CD14 BV605 (clone: M5E2), anti-CD16 PE-Cy7/BV711 (clone: 3G8), and anti-CD3 PE (clone: HIT3a) from BioLegend; anti-CD20 e450 (clone: 2H7), anti-CD19 e450 (clone: SJ25C1), anti-CD2 e450 (clone: RPA-2.10), and anti-IL-1β (clone: CRM56) from eBioscience; anti-CD56 e450 [clone: B159 (RUO)], anti-HLA-DR APC-Cy7 [clone: G46-6 (RUO)], and anti-CD66b e450 (clone: G10F5) and CCR2 PerCP Cy5.5 from BD Biosciences. Staining protocol proceeded as described above for imaging flow cytometry analysis. Surface Glut-1 receptor expression was detected by binding to the Glut-1 ligand fused to enhanced green fluorescent protein (GFP) (Metafora Biosystems, Evry, France), as previously described (53 (link)). In brief, 106 cells were incubated for 20 min with 10 µl of Glut-1–GFP solution prior to Live/Dead staining using LIVE/DEAD Cell Viability Assay (Life Technologies, CA, USA). GFP fluorescence was detected by staining cells with Alexa Fluor 647 anti-GFP antibody at 1:200 (Biolegend). Data were acquired on a BD Fortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). All compensation and gating analyses were performed using FlowJo 10.5.3 (TreeStar, Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Monoclonal Antibody Characterization Panel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were used: anti-CD83 labeled with APC, anti-CD80-FITC, anti-CD40-PE, anti-CD86 coupled to PERCP-Cy5, anti-Lin-FITC, anti-HLA-DR-APC-Cy7, anti-CD11c-PerCP-Cy5.5 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), anti-BDCA1 and anti-BDCA4 (Miltenyi Biotech) tagged with APC, and anti-ILT4 labeled with PE (BioLegend, San Diego, CA). For functional studies, purified anti-human ILT4 and purified anti-human ILT2 mAbs were employed (BioLegend, San Diego, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Flow Cytometry Analysis of Immune Cell Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cryopreserved whole blood was thawed at room temperature, washed with RPMI 1640 plus 5mm EDTA (Life Technologies, Inc.), and diluted in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS. Viability was determined using CD45 FITC (BD Biosciences Becton Dickinson). Cell pellets (100μl) were incubated with different panels of antibodies including anti-CD3-Alexa Fluor700, anti-CD4-APC, anti-CD127-PE-Cy5 (Bio Legend), anti-CD25-APC-Cy7, anti-CD14-APC-Cy7, anti-CD15-PE-Cy5, anti-CD19-PE-Cy7, anti-CD11c PE-Cy5, anti-HLA-DR-APC-Cy7, anti-CD123-PE-Cy7 (BD Biosciences) and anti-CD16-Pacific Orange (Invitrogen). In those panels to determine the production of chemokines, we also include anti-CCL22-PE and anti-IL-10- Pacific Blue (BD Biosciences). After 20 minutes of staining, cells were fixed using a BD FACS lysing solution (BD Biosciences). Cells were analyzed on a Fortessa flow cytometer.
Tregs were analyzed gating on CD3+ CD4+ CD25+ CD127low and mDCs were analyzed gating on Lineage (CD3, CD14, CD20 FITC) negative HLA-DR+CD11c+CD123+
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!