The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using sorvall legend rt

1

Fungal and Bacterial Supernatant Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fungal culture supernatants were prepared in flasks inoculated with 1 x 106 A. fumigatus conidia/mL in 100 mL LB and incubated at 37 °C [23 (link)]. After 26 h, culture supernatants were filtered through either a 0.22 μm nylon membrane (SteritopTM, Waltham, MA, USA) or Miracloth (Millipore Sigma, Burlington, ON, Canada). Culture supernatants were either lyophilized (Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA) or stored at −20 °C.
Bacterial culture supernatants were prepared in flat-bottom, non-tissue, culture-treated, 24-well plates (Falcon, Burlington, VT, USA) inoculated with 2 mL of 9.0 × 107 P. aeruginosa CFU/mL in LB per well with or without 0.5% L-arabinose (BioShop, Burlington, ON, Canada) and statically incubated at 37 °C. 48 h old culture supernatants were aspirated, separated from bacteria by centrifugation (Sorvall Legend RT+, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 2643× g for 30 min, and residual planktonic bacteria were heat-killed for 1 h at 60 °C [6 (link)]. Culture supernatants were dialyzed through 3.5 kDa molecular weight cut-off cellulose membrane (Fisherbrand, Pittsburgh, PA, USA or Spectrum Labs, Waltham, MA, USA) in 2 passes of deionized water, 1 pass of deionized water with 0.2% sodium azide (BioShop, Burlington, ON, Canada), 3 additional passes of deionized water, and 3 passes of 0.1% PBS. Culture supernatants were then either lyophilized or stored at 4 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Bacterial Culture Preparation for Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fifteen bacterial cultures were used in this study; five Listeria monocytogenes, five Escherichia coli O157:H7, and five Salmonella enterica isolates. Details of each strain used can be found in Table 1. Bacterial cultures were preserved in Tryptic Soy broth (TSB, Bacto, Difco, Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD) containing 30% glycerol and stored at −80°C until use. Cells were activated by three successive 24 hr transfers into TSB and incubated at 37°C. Activated cells were centrifuged (Sorvall Legend RT+, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) at 2000g for 10 min at 22°C, the pellet resuspended in 0.1% buffered peptone water, and washed twice more to yield a bacterial cocktail of approximately 8.0 log CFU/ml. Cultures were diluted 10‐fold into sterile peptone water to yield a concentration of approximately 7.0 log CFU/ml. This dilution was used in the disk diffusion assays.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

3D Printed Microfluidic Device for Cell Culture

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Corning Costar 7007 ultra-low attachment round bottom 96-well plates and phosphate buffered saline (PBS) were obtained from Corning (Corning, NY). Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), penicillin-streptomycin, and HCS CellMask Deep Red stain were acquired from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA). Laminin-I was purchased from Trevigen (Gaithersburg, MD). For fixation, 8% paraformaldehyde (PFA) solution was obtained from Electron Microscopy Sciences (Hatfield, PA). Parafilm “M” was obtained from Bemis (Oshkosh, WI). Fetal bovine serum (FBS), Agar powder, and Triton X-100 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). The High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) inserts were acquired from Hero Glue (Las Vegas, NV). The neoprene gasket, absorbent mat, and nylon mesh for the containment base were obtained from McMaster-Carr (Elmhurst, IL). All other device components were fabricated with a Stratasys (Rehovot, Israel) Objet 30 Polyjet 3D printer using VeroWhitePlus acrylic photopolymer and support material. Centrifugation was conducted using a Sorvall Legend RT obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA). For confocal microscopy, a Zeiss (Oberkochen, Germany) LSM 880 was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Reducing Power Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reducing power was measured as described by prior literature29 (link). To 2.5 mL of sample solution, 2.5 mL of 1% potassium ferricyanide and 2.5 mL of 0.2 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.6) were added, and the mixture was allowed to react in a water bath at 50 °C for 20 min. To the resulting solution, 2.5 mL of 10% trichloroacetic acid was added, and the mixture was centrifuged at 1935 × g after 10 min (Sorvall legend RT, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Thereafter, 2.5 mL of the supernatant was mixed with 2.5 mL of distilled water. The resulting solution was mixed with 1 mL of 0.1% ferric chloride, and the absorbance was measured at 700 nm using the spectrophotometer to express the reducing power.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Corynebacterium glutamicum Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The WT strain of Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC13869 was used for all the experiments. The ΔMscCG strain of Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC13869 generated for a different study19 (link) was used in our study. Vegetable peptone (Oxoid, VEGETABLE PEPTONE No 1, Code: VG0100) was used for CM2B-V, PYG-V, and GP-V medium. After autoclaving, precipitation of the Vegetable peptone was observed, and all media were resuspended by shaking gently before the use. Cells were incubated at 31.5 °C, 135 rpm for aerobic culture with the incubator INNOVA 44 (Eppendorf, Germany) and collected with the centrifuge Sorvall Legend RT (Thermo scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Extraction and Reconstitution of CRM-FDMT1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extracts of CRM-FDMT1, CRM-AZA-Mus, and RM-AZA-Mus were prepared as described previously [13 (link)]. CRM-FDMT1 (0.35 g) was reconstituted with water (1.65 mL), vortex-mixed (30 s), and sonicated (60 s) to produce 2 g of wet-tissue-equivalent. Extractions were performed by adding MeOH (5.5 mL) to 2 g of wet tissue (or equivalent), vortex-mixed (2500 rpm, 3 min; model DVX-500, VWR Int., Radnor, PA, USA), and centrifuged (3950 g, 10 min; Sorvall Legend RT + , Thermo Scientific, Osterode, Germany). The supernatants were transferred to 25 mL volumetric flasks and the pellets subjected to three further identical extractions, with the combined supernatants made to volume in the flask.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluating RBC Lysis by Polyplexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RBC lysis in the presence of polyplexes was evaluated to determine their hemocompatibility. Blood was collected from healthy human volunteers in tubes containing potassium EDTA (Sigma-Aldrich). Collected whole blood was centrifuged at 1,500 × g for 10 min at RT (Sorvall Legend RT; Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA), and RBCs were washed three times with PBS. To determine hemolysis, RBCs were diluted six times with PBS and incubated at RT with polyplexes (polymer:pDNA ratio 2:1 w/w) for 3 hr. The RBC-polyplex mixture was centrifuged for 10 min, and the supernatant (50 μL) was dissolved in 150 μL of 40:1 (v/v) ethanol: HCl mixture in a Nunc 96-well polypropylene MicroWell plate (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). The absorbance was measured at 399 nm. RBCs incubated with deionized water were used as the positive control for complete lysis, and RBCs incubated with PBS served as no lysis control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Extraction and Recovery of Lipophilic and Domoic Toxins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The appropriate extraction solvent (Table 2) was added to reconstituted CRM-FDMT1 in 50 mL centrifuge tubes (2 g for lipophilic toxins, 4 g for DA), vortexed at 2500 rpm for 3 min (model DVX-2500; VWR Int., Radnor, PA, USA), then centrifuged at 3950 × g for 10 min (Sorvall Legend RT+; Thermo Scientific, Osterode, Germany). The supernatant was transferred to a volumetric flask (25 mL for lipophilic toxins, 50 mL for DA) and the remaining CRM-FDMT1 pellet subjected to three further extractions steps. Supernatants were combined and made to volume in the volumetric flask. Toxin recovery was assessed by extracting the remaining pellet with a final 4.5 mL of solvent, making to 5 mL volume in a separate volumetric flask and measuring for the presence of residual analyte.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!