The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Prism 9.0.1 for macos

Manufactured by GraphPad
Sourced in United States

GraphPad Prism 9.0.1 for macOS is a scientific data analysis and graphing software. It provides tools for data analysis, curve fitting, and graph creation. The software is designed for use on macOS operating systems.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using prism 9.0.1 for macos

1

Opioid Dose Equivalence Calculation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive statistics were used with continuous variables reported as medians, interquartile ranges (IQRs) and ranges. To compare the doses ingested for differing opioids, an oral morphine equivalent dose (OME) was calculated using the table synthesised by Nielsen et al.
9 (link) with multiplication factors of the following: parenteral buprenorphine × 75, sublingual buprenorphine × 38.8, codeine × 0.1, oral dextropropoxyphene × 0.1, parenteral fentanyl × 0.2, transdermal fentanyl × 2.7, oral hydromorphone × 5, parenteral morphine × 3, oral oxycodone × 1.5, parenteral pethidine × 0.4, oral tapentadol × 0.4 and oral tramadol × 0.4. Dose equivalents for heroin and methadone were not performed. All analyses were performed in GraphPad Prism 9.0.1 for Mac OS (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Particle Size Analysis of Biomolecules

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All sizing and polydispersity measurements were carried out on an Uncle by Unchained Labs (USA) at 25°C in triplicate. Samples were adjusted to the indicated concentrations in 150 mM KCl and 20 mM of the following buffers based on pH: HEPES, pH 7.2; Tris–HCl, pH 8.2; CAPS, pH 10.2. Samples were analyzed both before and after a centrifugation step at 20,000 rcf for 10 min as indicated. Data were exported, further tabulated, graphed, and analyzed using GraphPad Prism 9.0.1 for macOS (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, https://www.graphpad.com).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Centrifugation-Based Quantification of McdB Condensation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Centrifugation was used to quantify the degree to which McdB and its variants condensed under certain conditions, as previously described (Alberti et al., 2019 (link)). Briefly, 100 µl of sample was incubated at the conditions specified for 30 min, and then centrifuged at 16,000 rcf for 2 min. The supernatant was removed and the pellet resuspended in an equal volume of McdB solubilization buffer [300 mM KCl, 20 mM CAPS, pH 10.2]; McdB does not condense at pH 10.2. Samples were then diluted into 4× Laemmli SDS–PAGE sample buffer. Pellet and supernatant fractions were visualized on a 4–12% Bis-Tris NuPAGE gel (Invitrogen) by staining with InstantBlue Coomassie Stain (Abcam) for 1 hr and then destaining in water for 14–16 hr. The intensities of the bands were quantified using Fiji v 1.0 and resultant data graphed using GraphPad Prism 9.0.1 for macOS (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, https://www.graphpad.com).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All FRAP measurements were performed using the indicated protein concentration with the addition of 1:1000 mNG-McdB based on molarity. All fluorescence imaging was performed using a Nikon Ti2-E motorized inverted microscope controlled by NIS Elements software with a SOLA 365 LED light source, a ×100 objective lens (Oil CFI60 Plan Apochromat Lambda Series for DIC), and a Photometrics Prime 95B Back-illuminated sCMOS camera. mNG signal was acquired using a ‘GFP’ filter set [excitation, 470/40 nm (450–490 nm); emission, 525/50 nm (500–550 nm); dichroic mirror, 495 nm]. Bleaching was conducted with a 405-nm laser at 40% power (20 mW) with a 200-μs dwell time. Recovery was monitored with a time-lapse video with 5-s intervals for 20 min. Image analysis was done in Fiji v 1.0. Intensities from bleached regions of interest were background subtracted and normalized using an unbleached condensate to account for any full field of view photobleaching. The values for each condensate were then normalized such that a value of 1 was set to the pre-bleach intensity and a value of 0 was set to the intensity immediately post-bleaching. Data were exported, further tabulated, graphed, and analyzed using GraphPad Prism 9.0.1 for macOS (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, https://www.graphpad.com).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Analysis of Carboxysome Localization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Image analysis including cell segmentation, quantification of cell length, foci number, intensity and spacing were performed using Fiji plugin MicrobeJ 5.13I (Ducret et al., 2016) . Cell perimeter detection and segmentation were done using the rod-shaped descriptor with default threshold settings. Carboxysome detection was performed using the smoothed foci function with tolerance of 50 and Z-score of 30. Data were exported, further tabulated, graphed and analyzed using GraphPad Prism 9.0.1 for macOS, GraphPad Software, San Diego, California USA, www.graphpad.com. Bacterial Two-Hybrid N -terminal T18 and T25 fusions of McdA, all McdA mutant variants, and McdB were constructed using the plasmids pKT25 and pUT18C. Plasmids were sequence-verified and co-transformed into E. coli BTH101 in both pairwise combinations (Karimova et al., 1998) . Several colonies of T18/T25 cotransformants were cultured in LB medium with 100 mg/ml ampicillin, 50 mg/ml kanamycin and 0.5 mM IPTG overnight at 30 C with 225 rpm shaking. Overnight cultures were spotted on indicator LB Xgal plates supplemented with 100 mg/ml ampicillin, 50 mg/ml kanamycin and 0.5 mM IPTG. Plates were incubated in the dark at 30˚C up to 48 hours before imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Cell Viability Assay with PrestoBlue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEp-2 or primary HAE cells were seeded at 50% confluence in 96-well plates and incubated with threefold serial dilution of compound with positive and negative controls as described above. After 48-hour incubation at 37°C, cells were incubated with PrestoBlue (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog no. A-13262) for 1 hour at 37°C and fluorescence was measured with an H1 synergy plate reader (BioTek). CC50 and 95% CIs after normalized nonlinear regression and variable slope were determined using Prism 9.0.1 for MacOS (GraphPad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Luciferase-based Dose-Response Assay for RSV

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Compound stocks were prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and, upon dilution in cell culture medium, reached in all wells a final DMSO concentration of 0.1%. For luciferase-based dose-response assays, HEp-2 or primary HAE cells were seeded a day before to reach 50% confluence in 96-well white plates. Threefold serial dilutions of compounds were prepared in triplicate using an automated Nimbus liquid handler (Hamilton) and transferred to the cells. Immediately after addition of compound, cells were infected with recRSV-fireSMASh. Each plate contained four wells each of positive and negative control (medium containing 100 μM cycloheximide or vehicle, respectively). Luciferase activities were determined at 48 hours after transfection using One-GLO buffer (Promega, catalog no. E6130) and a Synergy H1 (BioTek) plate reader. Normalized luciferase activities were analyzed with the following formula: % inhibition = (Signalsample – Signalmin)/(Signalmax – Signalmin) × 100, and dose-response curves were further analyzed by normalized nonlinear regression with variable slope to determine EC50 and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with Prism 9.0.1 for MacOS (GraphPad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!