The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using mouse anti fas2

1

Immunolabeling and Imaging of Drosophila Brains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Adult flies were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS/0.15% Triton X-100 for 2.5 h and brains were afterwards dissected. Larval brains were dissected first and then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 30 min. Brains were washed twice with PBT (0.3% Triton in PBS) before blocking in 5% normal goat serum (NGS) (5% NGS in PBT) at room temperature for 1 h, followed by incubation with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight. Primary antibodies were diluted in 5% NGS: mouse anti-TH clone LNC1 (1:200, Merck, MAB318), guinea pig anti-Lamin-DmO (1:300, kind gift from Georg Krohne, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany), mouse anti-Fas2 (1:10, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) or rabbit anti-GFP (1:1000, MoBiTec, A6455). Following three washing steps in PBT, brains were incubated for 4 h at room temperature with secondary antibodies: donkey anti-guinea-pig-DL650 (1:100, Thermo Fisher Scientific, SA5-10097) or donkey anti-guinea-pig-Cy3 (1:100, Dianova, 706-166-148); goat anti-rabbit-Alexa488 (1:100, Molecular Probes, A-11034); goat anti-mouse-Alexa488 (1:150, Dianova, 115-545-166), donkey anti-mouse-Cy3 (1:100, Dianova, 715-165-151) or donkey anti-mouse-Cy5 (1:100, Dianova, 715-175-151). After washing in PBT, brains were embedded in VectaShield (Vector Laboratories) and confocal images were recorded with a Leica TCS SPE microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunolabeling of Late Embryos

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies were used for immunolabelling of late stage embryos and chromosomal preparations: mouse anti-Fas2 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, DSHB), rabbit anti-HRP (Jackson Immunoresearch), mouse anti-Connectin (DSHB), rabbit anti-dsRED (Invitrogen), rabbit and mouse anti-GFP (Invitrogen), mouse anti-H3K4me3 (Invitrogen). Secondary antibodies were purchased from Invitrogen. DNA was labeled with DAPI (Invitrogen). Embryos were collected and fixed via a formaldehyde/MeOH method10 (link). Polytene chromosome preparations and staining were performed as in Karachentsev et al.27 (link). Images of the ventral nerve cord were obtained using a Leica SP8 using a 40x Objective. Fas2 and HRP labeled embryos were imaged and typically contained 8–10 hemisegments. Hemisegments were examined for midline crossing and in some instances the presence or integrity of the most lateral Fas2+ longitudinal track. Similar imaging and analysis were performed on Connectin/HRP labeled embryos.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Drosophila Embryo Antibody Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Embryo fixation and antibody staining were performed using standard methods. The following antibodies were used: rat anti-Pumilio (1:200, provided by Robin Wharton), mouse anti-Fas2 (1:100, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), mouse anti-prospero (1:20, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), rabbit anti-β-gal (1:1000, Abcam). RNA probes were made using cDNA clones obtained from the Drosophila Genome Resource Center, Indiana University, USA. Digested plasmids were used as template for in vitro transcription of DIG-labeled RNA probes (Roche Applied Science). In situ hybridization was performed using standard methods.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Embryo Collection and Immunohistochemistry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Embryo collection and fixation were performed as described (Langeland, 1999 ) with staging of embryos according to Campos-Ortega and Hartenstein (Campos-Ortega and Hartenstein, 1985 ). The following primary antibodies and dilutions were used: rabbit anti-Dll, 1:100 (Panganiban et al., 1994 (link)); 1:200 mouse 22C10, 1:10 (Fujita et al., 1982 (link); Zipursky et al., 1984 (link)); rat anti-Elav, 1:10 (O’Neill et al., 1994 (link)); mouse anti-Fas2, 1:10 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) (Hummel et al., 2000 (link)); mouse anti-Repo (Alfonso and Jones, 2002 (link)); mouse anti-Pros, 1:100 (Campbell et al., 1994 (link)); Cy5 anti-HRP, 1:100 (Jackson Immunochem) and guinea pig anti-Sens, 1:5,000 (Nolo et al., 2000 (link)). Alexa secondary antibodies (Life Technologies) were used at 1:100. Secondary antibodies used were Alexa Fluor 488 anti-mouse; Alexa Fluor 488 anti-rabbit; Alexa Fluor 488 anti-guinea pig; Alexa Fluor 568 anti-rabbit; Alexa Fluor 633 anti-mouse; Alexa Fluor 633 anti-rabbit; Alexa Fluor 633 streptavidin. Embryos were mounted in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunolabeling and Imaging of Drosophila Embryos

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies were used for immunolabelling of late stage embryos and chromosomal preparations: mouse anti-Fas2 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, DSHB), rabbit anti-HRP (Jackson Immunoresearch), mouse anti-Connectin (DSHB), rabbit anti-dsRED (Invitrogen), rabbit and mouse anti-GFP (Invitrogen), mouse anti-H3K4me3 (Invitrogen). Secondary antibodies were purchased from Invitrogen. DNA was labeled with DAPI (Invitrogen). Embryos were collected and fixed via a formaldehyde/MeOH method [13 (link)]. Polytene chromosome preparations and staining were performed as in Karachentsev et al. [21 (link)]. Images of the ventral nerve cord were obtained using a Leica SP8 using a 40x Objective. Fas2 and HRP labeled embryos were imaged and typically contained 8–10 hemisegments. Hemisegments were examined for midline crossing and in some instances the presence or integrity of the most lateral Fas2+ longitudinal track. Similar imaging and analysis were performed on Connectin/HRP labeled embryos.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!