The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using cd4 pe

1

Characterization of PBMCs and PDCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ex vivo PBMCs were immediately thawed, washed in cold wash buffer (phosphate-buffered saline, 2% fetal bovine serum, and 1 mM ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid). Cells were blocked with wash buffer containing 5% of heat-inactivated human plasma, followed by staining with CD16-FITC (SouthernBiotech), TRAIL-PE or isotype-matched antibody (BD Biosciences), CD3− Pacific Blue (BioLegend), CD107a-eFluor660 or isotype-matched antibody, and CD56-PE.Cy5.5 (eBioscience), and fixed with 2%paraformaldehyde prior to analysis. Cell cultures were stained with the same antibodies as patients' sample but CD56-PerCP.Cy5.5 (BioLegend) was used instead. For TLR3 detection, cells were further permeabilized with BD®Perm reagent and stained with TLR3-PE (BD Pharmingen). PDCs were assessed with the following antibody cocktail: CD4-PE (SouthernBiotech), CD11c-PE.Cy7 (BD Pharmingen), and BDCA4-APC (Miltenyi). About 1 × 105 events in the lymphocyte gate were acquired when analyzing patients' samples in FACS Aria IIu. For in vitro samples, 5 × 105 events were acquired in the same gate using BD Accuri C6 or FACS AriaIIu. All samples were analyzed in up to 18 hours after fixation. IL12 (R&D Systems) and IFNα (PBL Interferon Source) were detected in cell culture supernatant or plasma samples by ELISA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Bursal T-cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lymphocytes were isolated from bursal samples and were used to study T-cell infiltration by flow cytometry as previously described (Carballeda et al., 2011 (link)). Briefly, bursas were mechanically disrupted in RPMI 1640 and cellular suspensions were passed through a 40 μm mesh (Cell Strainer, BD). Mononuclear cells were isolated by centrifugation over a Histopaque density gradient. About 1 × 106 cells per well were seeded on a 96-well plate and stained with different combinations of antibodies. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (CD3-SPRD, CD4-PE, CD8α-FITC, Bu-PE) were purchased from SouthernBiotech (Birmingham, AL, United States). Cell suspensions were analyzed with a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, United States) and CellQuest software. The lymphocyte gate was defined by the forward/side scatter characteristics of the cells and 50,000 events were analyzed for each sample. Individual values of all experimental groups were normalized to the mean values of unchallenged healthy group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Lymphocyte Analysis of Chicken Immunogenicity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lymphocytes were isolated from the BF as previously described [19] (link). Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (CD3-SPRD, CD4-PE, CD8a-FITC) from Southern Biotech (Birmingham, USA) were employed. Cell suspensions were analyzed with a BD FACSCalibur Flow Cytometer (BD Biosciences, USA) and CellQuest software. The lymphocyte gate was defined by the forward/side scatter characteristics of the cells and 30,000 events were analyzed. Six specific pathogen free chickens were used in each group. Inoculations were performed at 14 days post hatch (1st) and 28 days post hatch (2nd). Animals were challenged three weeks after the 2nd inoculation and euthanized 5 days post challenge.
The mean values of the bursae from three PBS-inoculated unchallenged SPF chickens were used for normalization of the values of all experimental groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!