The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

135 protocols using evo 40

1

Characterization of Pine Needle Biochar

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface
area analysis of pine needle litter biochar prepared
at 550 °C (PNBC550) was measured from its N2 isotherm
using a gas sorption analyzer (Monosorb rapid BET surface analyzer).
The morphology of the unloaded PNBC550 and lead-loaded PNBC550 was
examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (model EVO 40, Zeiss)
at different magnifications ranging from 200× to 10,000×.
SEM/EDX analysis was carried out on biochar loaded onto carbon tape
on stainless steel stubs using a Zeiss EVO 40 SEM employing a BRUKER
EDX system to study the surface elemental composition. Transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) analysis was carried out using a transmission
electron microscope (model JEOL 2100F) at magnifications up to 100,000×
for both loaded and unloaded biochars.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

SEM and EDX Analysis of Plant Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The method of Zaid and Mohammad (2018) (link) was used for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray analyzer (EDX) analysis. Fresh leaves from axillary positions were collected and fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde plus 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) for 4 h. This was followed by a second fixing with 1% osmium tetroxide in P buffer (pH 7.0) for 1 hand washing with P buffer for 20 min. Fixation was followed by alcohol dehydration in a graded series of ethanol (50, 70, 80, 90, 95, and 100%). Fixed and dehydrated leaves were dehydrated in a Carl Zeiss EVO 40 (Germany) scanning electron microscope critical point dryer with liquid CO2. The leaf samples were coated with gold–palladium and observed under a Carl Zeiss EVO 40 (Germany) scanning electron microscope at high voltage (15 kV) and magnifications of 4,000 × for stomata and 100 × for peltate glandular trichomes (PGT).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

SEM Visualization of Biofilm Structure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM (Zeiss EVO40, Germany, USA) was used to visualize the surface structure of the biofilm samples at an accelerated voltage of 10 kV. Briefly, the dried samples were placed onto a metallic stub and subjected to gold palladium sputtering (EM ACE200, Leica) for 45 s. The prepared samples were then examined under SEM (Zeiss EVO40). The experiments were repeated with three independent studies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Elemental Analysis of Dried Bacteria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacterial specimens were dried at 45 °C and placed on an aluminum sample holder; the elemental composition was analyzed using an X-Max Silicon Drift Detector (Oxford Instruments, GB) mounted on an EVO40 scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Mesophotic Octocoral Collection and Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The specimens were collected by bottom trawling from unexplored habitats down to 70 m deep in the middle mesophotic zone (from 40 to 150 m), on board of the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute R/V Urracá along the north and central Pacific coast, from Santa Elena Bay to the Nicoya Gulf.
The specimens were fixed in 70% ethanol or air-dried. For microscopic study, they were prepared according to the protocol described by Breedy and Guzman (2002) , and observed using optic microscopy, Olympus LX 51 inverted microscope, and scanning electron microscopy, with a Hitachi 3700 at the

Research Center of Microscopic Structures

(CIEMIC)
of the

University of Costa Rica

(UCR)
and a Zeiss EVO 40 at the Electron Microscopy Laboratory (Tupper Research and Conference Center). The holotype and paratypes are deposited in the

Museo de Zoología, Universidad de Costa Rica

(MZUCR)
.
The taxonomic approach was by the evaluation of characters following Breedy and Guzman (2015 , 2016 ). Morphological characters of colonies and sclerites are presented PageBreakin Tables 12 and comparison with the type material of the related taxa in the genus. Measurements of branches are given taking in account the length of the calyces whether preserved in ethanol or dry. Terminology used in descriptions mostly follows Bayer et al. (1983) and Breedy and Guzman (2015 , 2016 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Plant Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The powder (untreated) and the marc of the plant samples following the different extraction processes were prepared for scanning electron microscopy. For this, the herb powder was dried for at least two hours under vacuum between 40°-50 °C. The samples were sputtered, coated with gold and scanned at higher vacuum mode for any structural changes under an electron microscope (Zeiss EVO40) [24] , [25] (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterizing Nanoparticle Morphology via Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surface morphology of the NPs was studied using scanning electron microscopy (EVO40; Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). For imaging, lyophilized samples were spread on a carbon tape of an aluminum stub and gold coating applied with sputter coating (Polaron SC7640) at 2 kV for 200 seconds under inert argon, in order to make them conductive. Gold-coated samples were vacuum-dried and then examined at electron high-tension voltage of 20 kV and 50,000× magnification. For transmission electron–microscopy studies, lyophilized NPs were suspended in sterile deionized water and coated on carbon film with 200-mesh copper grids. Imaging was done with electron microscopy (JEM 2100F; Jeol, Tokyo, Japan) under high vacuum and 200 kV voltage.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of Synthesized DSE-AgNPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphological features of synthesized DSE-AgNPs were characterized by SEM (Carl Zeiss EVO 40, Germany) with accelerating voltage of 20 kV. AgNPs were sonicated for 10 min before being used. The shape and size of AgNPs were characterized by higher resolution transmission electron microscope (HR-TEM). For HR-TEM, a drop of dispersed solution was placed on a copper grid at room temperature. The HR-TEM images were obtained using a Tecnai G2 (FEI, Electron Optics, USA) transmission electron microscopy with an accelerated voltage of 200 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of samples was observed using a scanning electron microscopy (EVO40, Zeiss, Jena, Germany), at acceleration voltage of 18 kV. Before testing, all the specimens were sputter-coated with gold for 5 s using a Balzers coater (PV205P, Oerlikon Balzers Coating SA, Brügg, Switzerland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Evaluating Antibacterial Morphological Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface morphology of S. aureus treated with wild-type cryptdin-2 and its PEGylated variant was studied by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) analysis39 (link). Briefly, S. aureus cells were grown to mid-logarithmic phase, washed and resuspended in PBS. The recombinant peptide variants (2 × MIC) were added separately to the tubes containing 108 cells/mL and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. Post treatment, cells were washed with PBS and fixed with Karnowsky´s fixative. Subsequently, the samples were dehydrated using ethanol and were imaged by Scanning Electron Microscope (Zeiss EVO40).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!