The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

24 protocols using anti ha y 11

1

In silico prediction and in vitro validation of p73 binding site in AMOT gene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In silico prediction of the p73 responding element (RE) within the human AMOT gene (ENSG00000126016-; Transcript ID ENST 00000371959.7) was performed using the open access database for eukaryotic transcription factor binding profiles JASPAR [39 (link)]. Matrix models MA0861.1 and MA0525.1 were applied, and a site with a score of 13.3 was selected for further in vitro analysis. The following primers encompassing the p73RE in human AMOT gene were used: F→5′-TGTCCCCTTTTCTGCAGAGC-3′ and R→5′-GCTCCCCACTGACACGTTAA-3′.
ChIP analysis was carried out in HA-TAp73β-Saos2-Tet-On cells as described [25 (link)], using the following antibodies: anti-HA (Y-11) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, #sc805), anti-p73 (EP436Y) (Abcam, # ab40658) and anti-p53 (C-19) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, #sc1311).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

TCA-based Bim1-HA protein extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TCA-precipitated protein extracts were used to analyze Bim1-HA expression in wild type Bim1-HA or Bim1-HA mutants. For all figures, except Supplementary Figure 4c, overnight cultures of C. neoformans cells were diluted to an OD600 of 0.3 in 5 ml of fresh SC medium, left untreated or treated with the indicated concentration of BCS for the indicated times. For the data in Supplementary Figure 4c, overnight cultures of C. neoformans cells were diluted to an OD600 of 0.3 and grown to an OD600 of 3. After each time point TCA was added to a final concentration of 10%, cells pelleted, collected with 20% TCA and further processed as described. Supernatants from experiment in Supplementary Figure 4c were directly treated with loading buffer before SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting analysis. TCA protein extracts and supernatants were analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-HA (Y-11, polyclonal, Santa Cruz or SG-77, polyclonal, Invitrogen) and anti-H3 (D1H2, polyclonal, Cell Signaling) antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Antibody Validation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A GFP primary antibody (JL-8, Clontech) and an anti-HA (Y-11, Santa Cruz) were diluted to a 1∶10,000 to detect overexpressed protein samples. An anti-DDK (Origene) was used at a 1∶4,000 dilution to detect overexpressed hTTP-Flag and hZfp36l1-Flag. The membranes were incubated with a secondary antibody, goat anti-mouse IgG (Santa Cruz) or goat anti-rabbit (Bio-Rad), at a 1∶10,000 dilution, both antibodies were HRP-conjugated. To detect the endogenous ZFP36L2 protein, the anti-ZFP36L2 polyclonal antibody (C2-ZFP36L2-AS, described in [5] (link)) was used at a 1∶10,000 dilution followed by a secondary goat anti-rabbit at a 1∶10,000 dilution. As a loading control, a β-actin rabbit polyclonal antibody (N-21, Santa Cruz) was used at a 1∶5,000 dilution, followed by a secondary goat anti-rabbit at a 1∶10,000 dilution. The LHR antibody was used at a 1∶2,000 dilution (ProteinTech), followed by a secondary goat anti-rabbit at a 1∶10,000 dilution. All antibody signals were developed using a SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Pierce) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunofluorescence Staining of Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells grown on 13 mm coverslips were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (w/v) in PBS for 15 min, prior to permeabilisation in 0.5% Triton X-100 (v/v) in PBS for 15 min. Cells were then blocked in blocking buffer for 1 h, prior to 1 h labelling with primary antibody at 1 : 500 dilution (anti-HA (Y-11) (Santa Cruz) or anti-Flag antibody). Cells were washed three times before being stained with secondary antibody for 1 h (anti-mouse and anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 and 594 antibodies (Thermo Fisher)). Cells were washed three more times and then mounted on glass slides using Vectorshield mounting media containing DAPI (Vectorlabs; Peterborough, UK). Images were collected using Openlab5 software (Improvision; Coventry, UK) and an Olympus BX60 fluorescent microscope fitted with a Hamamatsu C4742-95 camera.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification and Immunoblotting Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein lysate was quantified using a standard Bradford assay and 10 μg of lysate was used for immunoblotting experiments. For Blue Native PAGE, cells were lysed in 1x Sample Preparation buffer (ThermoFisher) containing 1% digitonin. 1% SDS was supplemented for SDS-PAGE. All proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes using TurboBlot (Bio-rad) at 2.5 mA for seven mins. The primary antibodies used were anti-FLAG (M2, Sigma-Aldrich Cat# F3165, RRID:AB_259529), anti-GAPDH (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Cat# sc-47724, RRID:AB_627678) and anti-HA (Y-11, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Cat# sc-805, RRID:AB_631618). The secondary antibodies were anti-rabbit IgG-HRP (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs Cat# 111-035-003, RRID:AB_2313567), anti-mouse IgG-HRP (light chain specific) (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs Cat# 205-032-176, RRID:AB_2339056) and anti-mouse IgG-HRP (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs Cat# 115-035-003, RRID:AB_10015289).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Tyrosine Phosphorylation Mapping of EphB4

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
COS cells were transfected with 1 μg of pShuttle-IRES-hrGFP-2 expressing either empty vector, WT-EphB4-HA, or mutant-EphB4-HA. The mutant-EphB4-HA plasmids consisted of: Y574F-, Y581F-, Y590F-, Y596F-, Y614F-, Y653F-, Y730F-, Y736F-, Y774F-, Y806F-, Y821F-, Y837F-, Y906F-, or Y924F-substitution. After 24 hr starvation, the transfected Cos-7 cells were treated with Ephrin-B2/Fc (2 μg/ml) for 1 min. Cell lysates were then harvested and prepared. Whole cell lysates were then immunoprecipitated for the HA-tag. The IP sample underwent immunoblotting for both HA (Eph-B4) and pTyr using the primary antibodies anti-HA [Y-11] (Santa Cruz, #sc-805) and anti-pTyr [4G10] (Millipore, #05-321), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

TCA-based Bim1-HA protein extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TCA-precipitated protein extracts were used to analyze Bim1-HA expression in wild type Bim1-HA or Bim1-HA mutants. For all figures, except Supplementary Figure 4c, overnight cultures of C. neoformans cells were diluted to an OD600 of 0.3 in 5 ml of fresh SC medium, left untreated or treated with the indicated concentration of BCS for the indicated times. For the data in Supplementary Figure 4c, overnight cultures of C. neoformans cells were diluted to an OD600 of 0.3 and grown to an OD600 of 3. After each time point TCA was added to a final concentration of 10%, cells pelleted, collected with 20% TCA and further processed as described. Supernatants from experiment in Supplementary Figure 4c were directly treated with loading buffer before SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting analysis. TCA protein extracts and supernatants were analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-HA (Y-11, polyclonal, Santa Cruz or SG-77, polyclonal, Invitrogen) and anti-H3 (D1H2, polyclonal, Cell Signaling) antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Co-immunoprecipitation of Protein Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293 cells were transfected by lipofectamine (Invitrogen) and then lysed in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA [pH 8.0], 0.5% sodium deoxylcholate, 10 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1M dithiothreitol) with 1% NP-40. For co-immunoprecipitation, cell lysates were immunoprecipitated by anti-HA (Invitrogen) or anti-FLAG (Sigma) beads. Immuno-complexes or samples for western blot analysis were electrophoresed in a SDS-polyacryalamide gel, transferred onto PVDF membrane and probed with anti-HA Y-11(1:4000, Santa Cruz) or anti-FLAG (1:5000, Sigma) antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

SDS-PAGE and Immunoblotting of Protein Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting were performed with standard protocols described previously using 5 to 10% acrylamide gels [57 (link)]. SDS-PAGE gels were stained with CBB (Coomassie brilliant blue) or silver. For immunoblotting, samples separated by SDS-PAGE were transferred to a nitrocellulose or PVDF membrane, stained with CBB or Ponceau S if necessary, incubated with specific primary antibodies and subsequently HRP (horseradish peroxidase)-conjugated secondary antibodies. Immuno-reaction was detected using a TMB (3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine peroxidase) substrate kit (Vector Laboratories), Pierce ECL immnoblotting substrate (Thermo Scientific) or ECL prime immunoblotting detection reagent (GE Healthcare). Primary antibodies used were as follows: anti-DYX1C1 CT299 (Rabbit: this study), anti-PF13/KTU (Rabbit: [17 (link)]), anti-IDA10/MOT48 (Rabbit: this study), anti-IC138 (Rabbit: [62 (link)]), anti-IC2 (Mouse: [63 (link)]), anti-Actin (Rabbit: [64 (link)]), anti-p28 (Rabbit: [59 (link)]), and anti-HA 3F10 (Rat: Roche Applied Science) or anti-HA Y11 (Rabbit: Santa Cruz). HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse secondary antibodies were commercially purchased from Invitrogen. Anti-PF13/KTU antibody was a generous gift from Dr. David R. Mitchell (SUNY Upstate Medical University).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Cell Adhesion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
104 cells were seeded onto an 8-well Lab-TekII chamber slide, fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde solution (Sigma), and permeabilized in 0.1% Triton 100X (Sigma), PBS buffer at room temperature for 10 min. The cells were then washed 3 times with PBS and incubated for 1 h with 10% horse serum in PBS blocking solution. The cells were incubated overnight at 4°C with murine monoclonal anti-E-cadherin clone 36, (Becton Dickinson), anti-β-catenin clone 14 (Becton Dickinson), anti-fibronectin clone 10 (Becton Dickinson), anti-vimentin clone V9 (Dako), or with a polyclonal rabbit anti-HA Y11 (Santa-Cruz) primary antibody, washed in PBS, and then incubated for 1 h at room temperature with a goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 533 secondary antibody (A21422, Invitrogen) or with a mouse anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 555 secondary antidody (A21428, Invitrogen). After extensive washes in PBS, the nuclei were stained with 5 mg/ml Hoechst for 10 min and mounted with Fluoromount-G (SouthernBiotech). All matched samples were photographed with an immunofluorescence microscope (Leica) and identical exposure times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!