The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

33 protocols using rm2000

1

Characterization of Laser-Induced Graphene Sensors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface morphology of the samples was characterized by a scanning electron microscope (SEM, SHIMADZU SSX-550, Kagoshima, Japan). The Raman scattering spectra were then characterized by a Raman spectrometer (RENISHAW RM2000, London, UK). The resistivity of LIG samples generated at different laser powers was tested on a four-probe measurement system (RTS-9, PROBES TECH, Beijing, China), while the resistance of LIG samples with different line widths was tested using a multimeter (PROSKIT MT-1280, China). The responses of LIG strain sensors and LIG pressure sensors were tested with a DM3058 digital multimeter (Rigol Technologies). A repeatability test of the sensors was performed by an electric stretching machine (LONG XIANG XWFTL, Beijing, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Laser-Induced Graphene Sensors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface morphology of the samples was characterized by a scanning electron microscope (SEM, SHIMADZU SSX-550, Kagoshima, Japan). The Raman scattering spectra were then characterized by a Raman spectrometer (RENISHAW RM2000, London, UK). The resistivity of LIG samples generated at different laser powers was tested on a four-probe measurement system (RTS-9, PROBES TECH, Beijing, China), while the resistance of LIG samples with different line widths was tested using a multimeter (PROSKIT MT-1280, China). The responses of LIG strain sensors and LIG pressure sensors were tested with a DM3058 digital multimeter (Rigol Technologies). A repeatability test of the sensors was performed by an electric stretching machine (LONG XIANG XWFTL, Beijing, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Characterization of Porous Catalysts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Micromeritics ASAP 2010 instrument (Tristar II 3020, Norcross, GA) was used to test BET surface areas of the as-prepared porous catalysts by nitrogen physisorption measurements at 77 K. An aberration-corrected FEI Tecnai G2 F20 S-TWIN (S) TEM (Hillsboro, OR) operating at 300 kV with the energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectra were used to get STEM-HAADF imaging. The Physical Electronics Quantum 2000 Scanning ESCA Microprobe (Physical Electronics Inc., PHI, MN) equipped with a monochromatic Al Kα anode was used to measure the XPS (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) of the as-prepared catalysts. D/max-TTR III X-ray powder diffractometer (Rigaku International Corp., Tokyo) using Cu Kα radiation source was utilized to test the XRD (X-ray diffraction) patterns of different catalysts. The Renishaw RM2000 was employed to collect Raman spectra at room temperature from 100 to 3,000 cm−1 with 532 nm argon ion laser. Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) analysis was conducted using a PerkinElmer Optima 8000 instrument. The thermal gravimetric (TG) measurements were conducted by Shimadzu DTG-60AH differential thermal analyzer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Mineralogical Analysis of NWA 8003

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Characterization of the crystal structures of minerals in NWA 8003 was performed by obtaining their Raman spectra and Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD) patterns, and comparing these with the spectra and patterns in datasets. Raman spectra were measured with the laser micro-Raman spectrometer Renishaw RM2000 at Nanjing University. A microscope was used to focus the excitation laser beam of 514 nm (Ar+ laser) on the target phases. The sample was excited by a laser power of ~5 mW, using a spot size of ~2–3 μm. The Raman spectra baselines were reduced by using the OPUS software (version 3.1). The minerals’ EBSD patterns were obtained using an Oxford EBSD detector attached to a JEOL 7000F FEG-SEM at Hokkaido University, at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV and an incident beam current of 4 nA. Before analysis, the sample was vibro-polished and carbon-coated. The experimental EBSD patterns were indexed using the Aztec software with structures from both the HKL dataset and a dataset from the Mineralogical Society of America. The Aztec software automatically suggests indexing solutions ranked by the lowest ‘mean angular deviation’ (MAD) as a ‘goodness of fit’. MAD values of <1 are considered desirable for accurate solutions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

SERS Characterization of Rhodamine B

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RhB with analytically purity purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd was used as the probe molecule to study the SERS activities of the NWs. Before the SERS measurement, a 2 μL droplet of the RhB aqueous solution was dropped on each of the MGNWAs substrates which were subsequently dried at 323 K for 30 min. The solution diffused on the surface to be a spot with 0.4 cm in diameter. The SERS measurements were carried out in the center of the droplet at room temperature by a microscopic confocal Raman spectrometer (RM2000, Renishaw PLC, England) using a charge-coupled device (CCD) detector with a resolution of 1 cm−1. The laser beam power was 4.7 mW and the laser beam diameter was 5 μm. Excitation wavelength of 514 nm (according to the previous literature21 ), scan time of 30 s, field lens of 20 times and accumulation of 4 times were applied. The SERS mapping measurements were carried out in the center of the droplet by a microscopic confocal Raman spectrometer (LabRAM HR Evolution, HORIBA Jobin Yvon, France) using a charge-coupled device (CCD) detector with a resolution of 0.65 cm−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Raman Spectroscopy of Bimetallic Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raman spectra of the bimetallic nanoparticles deposited on aluminum plate were measured at different points of the dried sample by using a Renishaw RM2000 micro-Raman instrument equipped with a diode laser emitting at 785 nm. Sample irradiation was accomplished by using the 50× microscope objective of a Leica Microscope DMLM. The backscattered Raman signal was fed into the monochromator through 40 μm slits and detected by an air-cooled CCD (2.5 cm−1 per pixel) filtered by a double holographic Notch filters system. Spectra were calibrated with respect to a silicon wafer at 520 cm−1.
SERS spectra of 10−4 M 2,2′-bipyridine (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri (USA), 99% purity) in bimetallic colloid were obtained after addition of 10−2 M NaCl (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri (USA), 99.999% purity) in order to increase the SERS enhancement without compromising the colloidal stability. The 647.1 nm line of a Kripton ion laser and a Jobin-Yvon HG2S monochromator equipped with a cooled RCA-C31034A photomultiplier were used. A defocused laser beam with 100 mW power was employed for impairing thermal effects. Power density measurements were made using a power meter instrument (model 362; Scientech, Boulder, CO, USA) giving ∼5% accuracy in the 300–1000 nm spectral range.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Characterization of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were characterised via scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Quanta FEG 250), transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Tecnai G2 F20), diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFT, Spectrum 100 FT-IR), and Raman spectroscopy (Renishaw RM2000). The crystallinity of the sample was investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD, BRUKER D8 ADVANCE), whereas the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area (Micromeritics ASAP2020), pore volume, and pore size were characterised using nitrogen adsorption at liquid nitrogen temperatures, and via X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo SCIENTIFIC ESCALAB 250Xi).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Characterization of Microscopic Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An ultra-micro balance (Mettler Toledo) with an accuracy of 10 μg was used to weigh the samples and chemicals. The microscopic architecture and chemical structure of samples were characterized by SEM (FE-SEM, Supra55, Carl Zeiss) with energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy, a high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HR-TEM, JEM-3010, JEOL), UV-visible spectrophotometer (UV-2700, Shimadzu), Raman spectroscopy (Ar laser, wavelength: 532 nm, RM2000, Renishaw), XPS (ThermoFisher scientific), and a D8 Advance Diffractometer (Bruker) with a Cu Kα source. Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms were collected at 77 K on a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 instrument. The specific surface area was obtained by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method. The pore size distribution was obtained from the density functional theory (DFT) method. The wetting behaviors were characterized by a contact angle analyzer (SL-200KB, KINO). The tap densities of the powders were measured as follows. A certain quantity of powders was added to a dry quartz tube and was then vacuumed until the volume of the powders did not change to measure the volume of the tapped powders. Then the mass and the measured volume of the tapped powders were used to calculate the tap density.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Raman and SERS Characterization of Lysozyme

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raman measurements were performed at room temperature on RENISHAW RM2000 micro-Raman apparatus (Pianezza, Italy) with a 785 nm laser as excitation source unless otherwise stated in the text. The relatively lower photon energy of the 785 nm laser was chosen to avoid thermal degradation of the protein. We used a 50× objective with accumulation times of 30 s per spectrum and a 70 µW power on the sample. The accumulation times and the laser power were the same for all Raman measurements.
SERS measurements were performed directly on AgNC/NS and GO-AgNC/NS coated QMC sensors after monitoring the adsorption of native Hen egg-white lysozyme (HWL-N) or fibrillar Hen egg-white lysozyme (HWL-F).
In the case of SERS measurements on glass substrates coated with GO-AgNC/NS layers, the coated slides were immersed in HWL-N or HWL-F solution for two hours to ensure that adsorption equilibrium was reached, then repeatedly rinsed with buffer and dried under nitrogen flux before each SERS measurement.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

SERS Activity of Mullite Nanowhisker Array

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RhB with analytically purity was used as the probe molecule to study the SERS activities of the mullite nanowhisker array. Before the SERS measurement, a 2 mL droplet of the RhB aqueous solution was dropped on each of the mullite nanowhisker array substrates which were subsequently dried at 50°C for 30 min. The solution diffused on the surface to be a spot with 0.4 cm in diameter. The SERS measurements were carried out in the center of the droplet at room temperature by a microscopic confocal Raman spectrometer(RM2000, Renishaw PLC, England) using a charge-coupled device (CCD) detector with a resolution of 1 cm−1. The laser beam power was 4.7 mW and the laser beam diameter was 5 mm. Excitation wavelength of 632.8 nm (according to the previous literature11 (link)), scan time of 30 s, field lens of 20 times and accumulation of 4 times were applied. The SERS mapping measurements were carried out in the center of the droplet by a microscopic confocal Raman spectrometer (LabRAM HR Evolution, HORIBA Jobin Yvon, France) using a charge-coupled device (CCD) detector with a resolution of 0.65 cm−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!