The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Anti ki67

Manufactured by Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Italy, Denmark

Anti-Ki67 is a laboratory reagent used to detect the Ki67 protein, a well-established marker of cell proliferation. It can be used in various immunohistochemical and flow cytometry applications to identify and quantify dividing cells.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

124 protocols using anti ki67

1

Immunofluorescence Staining for Ki-67 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunofluorescence staining was carried out using the method described in several previous studies [19 (link)–21 (link)]. 72 h post transfection, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) for 10 min and permeabilized by 0.2% Triton X-100 for 5 min at room temperature. Fixed cells were washed three times in PBS and blocked for 30 min with 3% BSA in PBS and then incubated with an anti-Ki-67 (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TE, USA) antibody for 2 h at RT, washed three times in PBS and incubated with goat anti-mouse Alexa-fluor 594 secondary antibody (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. Finally, cells were incubated with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for 5 min at room temperature. Images were captured using Nikon Eclipse.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Xenograft Tumor Tissue Immunohistochemistry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Xenograft tumor tissue samples were immunostained for p27 and Ki67. Anti-Ki67 was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Analysis of HOXA5 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The technical process of immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed as previously described7 (link). The HOXA5 staining strength was categorized into different groups depending on the positive cell percentage and positive cell staining density. The positive cell percentage was categorized into five grades: 0–3% (0), 3–25% (1), 26–50% (2), 51–75% (3), and 76–100% (4). The positive cell staining density was also categorized into four grades: negative (0), weak brown (1), moderate brown (2), and strong brown (3). The final immunohistochemical score was calculated as follows: immunoreactivity score (IRS) = intensity score × positive score. The final IRS were categorized into three groups: negative (≤3), weak positive (>3 but ≤6), and strong positive (>6). The antibodies used were as follows: anti-HOXA5 (1:100, sc-365784, Santa Cruz); anti-Ki67 (1:100, sc-23900, Santa Cruz); anti-cyclinD1 (1:100, sc-8396, Santa Cruz); anti-p21 (1:50, sc-817, Santa Cruz); anti-β-catenin (1:50, sc-7963, Santa Cruz); anti- p53 (1:50, sc-7963, Santa Cruz). The technical process of immunocytochemistry was performed as previously described22 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Mouse Tumor

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tumor formed in the mouse model was used for the IHC staining study. The staining assay was performed according to the standard protocol on five-micrometer formalin-fixed paraffin sections. After staining, a pathologist and an investigator blind to the study design scored the staining intensities according to an immunoreactive score (IRS) system [14 (link)]. The primary antibodies for IHC are anti-Nrf2 (ABclonal, 1 : 200), anti-Ki-67 (Santa Cruz, 1 : 200), anti-Notch1 (Cell Signaling, 1 : 100), anti-c-Myc (Santa Cruz, 1: 100), and anti-Slug (Santa Cruz, 1 : 100).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Analysis of Cellular Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were washed and then lysed in ice with Complete Tablet buffer (Roche) supplemented with 2 mmol/L sodium orthovanadate, and 1:1000 phenylmethanesulfonylfluoride (PMSF; Sigma‐Aldrich). A quantity of 35 μg of protein from each lysate was loaded on 15 or 5% SDS‐PAGE gels and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (PVDF, GE Healthcare Europe GmbH, Milan, Italy). They were incubated overnight at 4°C with specific primary antibody: anti‐ferritin (1:250, Santa‐Cruz), anti‐VDR (D‐6) (1:200, Santa‐Cruz), anti‐p53 (1:500, Santa‐Cruz), anti‐cMyc (1:200, Millipore S.p.A., Milan, Italy), anti‐Ki67 (1:500, Santa‐Cruz), anti‐Phospho‐p44/42 MAPK (Thr202/Tyr204, 1:1000 Cell‐Signaling). Protein expression was normalized and verified through ß‐actin detection (1:5000; Sigma, Milan, Italy).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunofluorescence Assay for Osteosarcoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunofluorescence was performed as described in a previous study [67 (link)]. Osteosarcoma cells were seeded at an initial confluence of 30% and were treated with the NR modulators at 10 μM for 2 days. The expression of the proliferation marker KI-67 in the osteosarcoma cells was measured by immunofluorescence staining. The area of positive fluorescence in 5 randomly selected fields in each group was calculated by using ImageJ 1.51j8 (NIH, USA). The relative KI-67-positive area was normalized to the costained DAPI-positive area. Osteosarcoma cells were seeded at an initial confluence of 15% and were treated with the NR modulators at 10 μM for 5 days. The expression of the apoptotic marker Cleaved-Caspase 3 in the osteosarcoma cells was measured by immunofluorescence staining. The antibodies that were used were anti-KI-67 (1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, #sc-23900, USA) and anti-Cleaved-Caspase 3 (1:500, Cell Signaling Technology, #9661, USA) antibodies.
Osteosarcoma cells were treated with the NR modulators for 2 days and harvested for cell cycle analysis. In brief, the cells were fixed in precooled 70% ethanol for 30 min at 4 °C and stained in the dark for 30 min with a solution containing 50 μg/ml propidium iodide (PI). Cells in the different phases of the cell cycle were then identified by using a FACScan flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Staining Procedure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The immunohistochemical staining procedure was performed as previously described [12 (link)]. The antibodies used were as follows: anti-PRDM4 (1:200 dilution, #ab126939, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), anti-Ki67 (1:400 dilution, #sc-23900, Santa Cruz, Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, California, USA), anti-E-cadherin (1:150 dilution, #sc-8426, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), anti-vimentin (1:200 dilution, #sc-6260, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), and anti-β-catenin (1:150 dilution, # sc-7963, Santa Cruz, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antibody Panel for Cell Signaling Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies used in this study: anti‐ASH2L (A300‐107A; Bethyl Laboratories), anti‐ASH2L (12331‐1‐AP; Proteintech Group), anti‐FLAG (4110‐FG; GNI), anti‐ERα (D8H8) (#8664; Cell Signaling Technology), anti‐ERα (F10) (sc‐8002; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti‐MLL1 (A300‐37A; Bethyl Laboratories), anti‐WDR5 (A302‐429A; Bethyl Laboratories), anti‐PAX2 (TA327502S; OriGene Technologies), anti‐Cyclin D1 (60186‐1‐lg; Proteintech Group), anti‐GAPDH (AC033; ABclonal Technology), anti‐Ki67 (sc‐15402; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti‐trimethyl H3‐K27 (07‐449; Millipore), anti‐trimethyl H3‐K4 (05‐745R; Millipore).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lung tissue sections were stained using anti-FOXM-1, anti-Ki-67, anti-PH3 (Santa Cruz) and anti-Cleaved Caspase-3 (Abcam) antibodies, as described previously (33 (link)). Tumor cells growing on coverslips were treated with 20 μM of RCM-1 for 24 h, fixed and stained with antibodies against FOXM1, FOXA1, β-catenin, Ki-67 and α-tubulin (Santa Cruz) as previously described (32 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total cell lysates were collected with RIPA buffer (Beyotime, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China) and quantified using the Bradford method. Proteins were separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and subsequently transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). The membranes were blocked with 5% milk in Tris-buffered saline containing Tween 20 and probed with the following primary antibodies: anti-Ki-67, anti-Bcl-2, anti-matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2), and anti-β-actin (all from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA). After incubation with corresponding horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies, protein bands were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The relative protein intensities were quantified using Gel-pro Analyzer® software (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!