The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Minispin plus

Manufactured by Eppendorf
Sourced in Germany, United States

The MiniSpin Plus is a compact, high-performance centrifuge designed for quick spin-downs of samples in microtubes. It features a maximum speed of 14,100 rpm and a maximum relative centrifugal force of 12,100 x g, enabling efficient sedimentation of even the smallest samples. The MiniSpin Plus is a reliable and versatile lab equipment solution for a variety of applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

87 protocols using minispin plus

1

Radiolabeled PSMA Binding and Internalization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Binding to and internalization of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 into LNCaP cells were assessed in vitro as previously described [40 (link)]. Briefly, an aliquot containing 2 × 106 LNCaP cells in RPMI-1640 medium (450 µL) was added to a vial and incubated with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (50 µL/~1 MBq) at 37 °C and under slight agitation for 30 and 60 min (n = 5 for each time interval). Then, the vials were centrifuged (825 g, 5 min) with Minispin® plus (EppendorfAG—Hamburg, Germany). The cell pellets and supernatants were separated, and their radioactivities were measured in a Wizard2™ 3” 2480 automatic gamma counter (PerkinElmer—Norwalk, CT, USA). Binding to LNCaP cells was calculated as follows (Equation (4)): Binding=cpm (pellet)cpm (pellet+supernatant)×100%
After that, pellets were resuspended in 0.5 mL of acid wash buffer (0.2 M acetic acid in 0.5 M NaCl solution, pH 2.8) and kept at room temperature for 5 min to remove cell-surface-bound [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. Then, the vials were centrifuged (825 g, 5 min) with Minispin® plus (EppendorfAG—Hamburg, Germany). The cell pellets and supernatants were separated and their radioactivities were measured in a Wizard2™ 3” 2480 automatic gamma counter (PerkinElmer—Norwalk, CT, USA). Internalization into LNCaP cells was calculated as follows (Equation (5)): Internalization=cpm (pellet)cpm (pellet+supernatant)×100%
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Exosome Isolation by PEG Precipitation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Commercial reagents for sEV isolation by PEG precipitation—ExoQuick (System Biosciences, CA) were used according to the manufacturer guidelines. Briefly, 200 µL of MCF7 or MDB-231 sEVs-containing media was combined with 1 mL ExoQuick-TC Solution in sterile Eppendorf tubes, mixed by inverting the tube several times, and incubated at 4 °C for 18 h. The solution was centrifuged at 1,500×g for 30 min in an Eppendorf MiniSpin Plus (Eppendorf, Germany). The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was suspended in 1 mL PBS and stored at 4 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Solvothermal Synthesis of Citric Acid CDs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CDs were synthesized from citric acid using a solvothermal method. In total, 4.3 g of citric acid (Chip and Dip, Moscow, Russia) and 8.6 g of urea (Vostokreaktiv, Khabarovsk, Russia) were dissolved in 65 mL of formamide (Reakhim, Moscow, Russia) using ultrasonic disperser Elmasonic S40H Elma (Elma Schmidbauer GmbH, Singen, Germany). The clear solution was then transferred to a 90 mL stainless steel polytetrafluoroethylene autoclave (TOPTION Laboratory Store, Xi’an, China) and heated for 12 h at 180 °C. Upon completion of the synthesis, the autoclave was cooled overnight to room temperature. The solution was transferred to a dialysis bag with pores (MWCO) of 12–14 kDa (Spectrum Labs, Moscow, Russia) and placed in a beaker containing deionized water and a magnetic stirrer HS Pro-DT (Stegler, Moscow, Russia) for 24 h. The solution was then filtered using a track membrane with a pore size of 100 nm (JINR, Dubna, Russia). The resulting product was centrifuged using an Eppendorf MiniSpin plus (Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany) at 14,500 rpm for 5 min and decanted over the sediment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multimodal Instrumental Analysis of Analytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analytes were extracted and analyzed from the matrix samples using the following equipment: ultrasonic unit Elmasonic S30 (Elma-Hans Schmidbauer GmbH, Germany), rotatory shaker Heidolph (Heidolph instruments GmbH, Germany), laboratory centrifuge Eppendorf miniSpin plus (Eppendorf, Germany), chromatography columns Agilent Zorbax SB-C8 150 mm × 4.6 mm × 1.8 μm, Zorbax SB-C18 150 mm × 4.6 mm × 1, 8 μm, and Zorbax SB-C18 250 mm × 4.6 mm × 1.8 μm. Extracts’ concentration was performed using an FMS Super Vap 24 sample preparation system (FMS Inc., USA). The analysis of the sample extracts was conducted with Dionex UltiMate 3000 (Thermo Scientific) with Q Exactive detector (Thermo Scientific) with electrospray ionization (ESI) and liquid chromatograph, LC-20, equipped with an autosampler and mass-selective detector LCMS-8050 with electrospray ionization at atmospheric pressure, (Shimadzu, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Azithromycin Dissolution Profiling Across Ages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dissolution studies were performed in the inForm platform (Pion Ò Inc., UK) using a two-stage approach. The azithromycin oral suspension was prepared as indicated in the previous subsection (USP 4 Apparatus Dissolution Studies). The clinical dose (i.e. infants 130 mg, children 300 mg and adults 500 mg) was down-scaled according to age-appropriate volumes (i.e. infants 150 mL, children 200 mL and adults 500 mL) (Table 1) according to a final dissolution volume of 80 mL. A two-stage approach was followed: fasted gastric conditions were simulated for 30 min (40 mL), followed by intestinal simulated conditions (40 mL of two-fold concentrated FaSSIF-V2 was added leading to a final volume of 80 mL). Sample collection (0.5 mL) took place at 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 120, 180 and 240 min. After collection, samples were filtered through an ultrafree filtering unit 0.45 mm PTFE and centrifuged (Eppendorf mini spin plus, Germany) at 8000 rpm for 2 min at room temperature. The filtrate was diluted with methanol and injected into the HPLC. Experiments were performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Lipid Hydroperoxides in Nanoemulsions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lipid hydroperoxide formation during storage was measured using an adaptation of the methodology proposed by [29 (link)]. Lipid extraction from the samples was carried out by adding 0.3 mL of each nanoemulsion to 1.5 mL of a mixture of isooctane:isopropanol (3:1% v/v), followed by vortexing at 24,000 rpm for 10 s (3 times) and centrifugation (MiniSpin Plus, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) at 3000 rpm for 2 min. Then, 0.1 mL supernatant was mixed with 2.8 mL methanol: butanol (2:1% v/v), 15 μL 3.94 M ammonium thiocyanate, and 15 μL ferrous iron solution, which was prepared by mixing equal amounts of 0.13 M barium chloride and 0.14 M iron sulfate. The absorbance at 510 nm was measured in a spectrophotometer (UV Mini 1240, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) after 20 min of storage in the dark at room temperature. Hydroperoxide concentrations were determined using a cumene hydroperoxide standard curve at concentrations from 0 to 5.5 mM. All nanoemulsions were measured in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Encapsulation of Multi-Drug Loaded Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five  mL solution of five drugs (Quercetin, naringin, ceftriaxone, ampicillin and amphotericin B) was prepared in methanol having concentration 1 mg/mL.5 mg ZnO-BCD NPs were added in each five-drug solutions separately upon continuous stirring at 600 rpm. After 24 h, the suspension was centrifuged (Minispin Plus, Eppendorf®) at 8000×g for 15 min to obtain drug (Quercetin, naringin, ceftriaxone, ampicillin and amphotericin B) loaded beta-cyclodextrin capped ZnO nanoparticles. Drug loaded nanoparticles were dried at room temperature and suspended in deionized water for further characterization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Synthesis of Beta-Cyclodextrin Capped ZnO Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the preparation of BCD-ZnO NPs complex, 30 mg of ZnO nanoparticles were dispersed in 10 mL of deionized water and sonicated for 15 min. Next, 30 mg beta-cyclodextrin was dissolved in 10 mL of deionized water and stirred at 600 rpm for 10 min to obtain a transparent solution. Both solutions were mixed under continuous stirring at 600 rpm. After six hours, beta-cyclodextrin capped ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO-BCD NPs) were separated by centrifugation (Minispin Plus, Eppendorf®) for 15 min at 8000×g and washed three times with deionized water. The supernatant was freeze-dried, and the residue weighed, which indicated that beta-cyclodextrin capped ZnO nanoparticles contained about 30.5% by weight of beta-cyclodextrin. Beta-cyclodextrin capped ZnO nanoparticles (BCD-ZnO NPs) were dried in oven below 80 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Synthesis of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Zinc oxide nanoparticles were synthesized by utilizing zinc acetate dihydrate and NaOH as precursors using direct precipitation method as previously described (Raoufi 2013 (link); Ghorbani et al. 2015 (link)). Aqueous solutions of zinc acetate dehydrate (0.1 M), and sodium hydroxide (0.2 M) were prepared. Both solutions were added drop wise into a beaker at room temperature with continuous stirring at 600 rpm for 2 h. The resulting white precipitation was separated by centrifugation (Minispin Plus, Eppendorf®) for 15 min at 10,000×g and subsequently washed three times with deionized water followed by acetone washing. The precipitates were dried in oven at 120 °C for 6 h and then calcinated at 300 °C in air atmosphere to obtain stable ZnO-NPs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

SMRTbell Library Preparation for Long-Read Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples (20 μg) of DNA (OD260/OD280 ≈ 1.8) were sheared using a Covaris® g-TUBE® device (Covaris, USA), diluted to 200–300 ng/μL in elution buffer, and centrifuged at 5,500 rpm (2029 g) for 2 min on a MiniSpin Plus (Eppendorf). We constructed SMRTbell libraries according to the Procedure & Checklist-20 kb Template Preparation using the BluePippin™ Size Selection protocol (http://files.pacb.com/Training/IntroductiontoSMRTbellTemplatePreparation/story_content/external_files/Introduction%20to%20SMRTbell%E2%84%A2%20Template%20Preparation.pdf). Briefly, the library was run on a BluePippin system (Sage Science, MA, USA) to select SMRTbell templates > 10 kb. Sequencing primers were annealed to the hairpins of the templates and bound with P5 sequencing polymerase and MagBeads (Pacific Biosciences, CA, USA). The libraries were sequenced on a PacBio RS II platform at Shanghai Personal Biotechnology Cp. Ltd.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!